In this article we will talk about a pulse generator for a Mayer cell.
Studying the element base of the electronic boards on which all the devices included in the complex installation used by Mayer in the hydrogen generator installed on his car were assembled, I assembled the “main part” of the device - a pulse generator.
All electronic boards perform certain tasks in the Cell.
The electronic part of the Mayer hydrogen generator mobile installation consists of two full-fledged devices, designed as two independent blocks. This is a control and monitoring unit for the cell that produces the oxygen-hydrogen mixture and a control and monitoring unit for the supply of this mixture to the cylinders of the internal combustion engine. A photo of the first one is shown below.
The control and monitoring unit for the operation of the cell consists of a secondary power supply device that supplies all module boards with energy and eleven modules - boards consisting of pulse generators, monitoring and control circuits. In the same block, behind the pulse generator boards, there are pulse transformers. One of eleven sets: the pulse generator and pulse transformer board is used specifically for only one pair of Cell tubes. And since there are eleven pairs of tubes, there are also eleven generators.
.
Judging by the photographs, the pulse generator is assembled on the simplest element base of digital logic elements. The schematic diagrams published on various sites dedicated to the Mayer Cell are not so far from the original in terms of their operating principle, with the exception of one thing - they are simplified and work uncontrolled. In other words, pulses are applied to the electrode tubes until a “pause” occurs, which is quickly set by the circuit designer at his discretion using adjustments. For Mayer, a “pause” is formed only when the Cell itself, consisting of two tubes, reports that it is time to take this pause. There is an adjustment for the sensitivity of the control circuit, the level of which is set quickly using adjustment. In addition, there is an operational adjustment of the duration of the “pause” - the time during which no pulses are received on the cell. The Mayer generator circuit provides automatic adjustment of the “pause” depending on the need for the amount of gas produced. This adjustment is carried out according to a signal received from the control unit for monitoring the supply of the fuel mixture to the internal combustion engine cylinders. The faster the internal combustion engine rotates, the greater the consumption of the oxygen-hydrogen mixture and the shorter the “pause” for all eleven generators.
The front panel of the Mayer generator contains slots for trimming resistors that adjust the pulse frequency, the duration of the pause between bursts of pulses and manually set the sensitivity level of the control circuit.
To replicate an experienced pulse generator, there is no need for automatic control of gas demand and automatic “pause” regulation. This simplifies the electronic circuit of the pulse generator. In addition, modern electronics are more advanced than they were 30 years ago, so with more modern chips available, it makes no sense to use the simple logic elements that Mayer previously used.
This article publishes a diagram of a pulse generator assembled by me, recreating the principle of operation of the Mayer cell generator. This is not my first design of a pulse generator; before it there were two more complex circuits capable of generating pulses of various shapes, with amplitude, frequency and time modulation, circuits for controlling the load current in the circuits of the transformer and the Cell itself, circuits for stabilizing the pulse amplitudes and the shape of the output voltage on the Cell. As a result of eliminating, in my opinion, “unnecessary” functions, the simplest circuit was obtained, very similar to the circuits published on various sites, but differing from them in the presence of a Cell current control circuit.
As in other published circuits, there are two oscillators in the cell. The first is a generator - a modulator that forms bursts of pulses, and the second is a pulse generator. A special feature of the circuit is that the first oscillator - modulator does not operate in the self-oscillator mode, like other developers of Meyer Cell circuits, but in the standby oscillator mode. The modulator operates on the following principle: At the initial stage, it allows the operation of the generator, and when a certain current amplitude is reached directly on the plates of the Cell, generation is prohibited.
In Mayer's mobile installation, a thin core is used as a pulse transformer, and the number of turns of all windings is huge. Not a single patent specifies the dimensions of the core or the number of turns. In a stationary installation, Mayer has a closed toroid with known dimensions and number of turns. This is what it was decided to use. But since wasting energy on magnetization in a single-cycle generator circuit is wasteful, it was decided to use a transformer with a gap, taking as a basis the ferrite core from the TVS-90 line transformer used in transistor black-and-white TVs. It most closely matches the parameters specified in Mayer's patents for permanent installation.
The electrical circuit diagram of the Mayer Cell in my design is shown in the figure.
.
There is no complexity in the design of the pulse generator. It is assembled on banal microcircuits - LM555 timers. Due to the fact that the generator is experimental and it is unknown what load currents we can expect, for reliability, IRF is used as the output transistor VT3.
When the Cell current reaches a certain threshold at which water molecules break, it is necessary to pause the supply of pulses to the Cell. For this purpose, a silicon transistor VT1 - KT315B is used, which prohibits the operation of the generator. Resistor R13 “Generation interruption current” is intended to set the sensitivity of the control circuit.
Switch S1 “Coarse duration” and resistor R2 “Exact duration” are operational adjustments to the duration of the pause between bursts of pulses.
In accordance with Mayer's patents, the transformer has two windings: the primary contains 100 turns (for 13 volt power supply) of PEV-2 wire with a diameter of 0.51 mm, the secondary contains 600 turns of PEV-2 wire with a diameter of 0.18 mm.
With the specified transformer parameters, the optimal pulse repetition frequency is 10 kHz. Inductor L1 is wound on a cardboard mandrel with a diameter of 25 mm, and contains 100 turns of PEV-2 wire with a diameter of 0.51 mm.
Now that you have “swallowed” all this, let’s debrief this scheme. With this scheme, I did not use additional schemes that increase gas output, because they are not observed in the Mayer mobile Cell, of course, not counting laser stimulation. Either I forgot to go with my Cell to the “whispering grandmother” so that she could whisper the high performance of the Cell, or I didn’t choose the right transformer, but the efficiency of the installation turned out to be very low, and the transformer itself got very hot. Considering that the water resistance is low, the Cell itself is not capable of acting as a storage capacitor. The cell simply did not work according to the “scenario” that Mayer described. Therefore, I added an additional capacitor C11 to the circuit. Only in this case, a signal shape with a pronounced accumulation process appeared on the output voltage oscillogram. Why did I put it not parallel to the Cell, but through the throttle? The cell current control circuit must detect a sharp increase in this current, and the capacitor will prevent this with its charge. The coil reduces the influence of C11 on the control circuit.
I used plain tap water, and I also used fresh distilled water. No matter how I distorted it, the energy consumption at a fixed performance was three to four times higher than directly from the battery through a limiting resistor. The resistance of the water in the cell is so low that an increase in the pulse voltage by the transformer was easily extinguished at low resistance, causing the magnetic circuit of the transformer to become very hot. It is possible to assume that the whole reason is that I used a ferrite transformer, and in the mobile version of the Mayer Cell there are transformers that have almost no core. It serves more as a frame function. It is not difficult to understand that Mayer compensated for the small thickness of the core with a large number of turns, thereby increasing the inductance of the windings. But this will not increase the resistance of the water, and therefore the voltage that Mayer writes about will not rise to the value described in the patents.
In order to increase efficiency, I decided to “throw out” the transformer from the circuit, where energy loss occurs. The schematic electrical diagram of the Mayer Cell without a transformer is shown in the figure.
.
Since the inductance of coil L1 is very small, I also excluded it from the circuit. And “lo and behold,” the installation began to produce a relatively high efficiency. I conducted experiments and came to the conclusion that for a given volume of gas, the installation spends the same energy as with direct current electrolysis, plus or minus the measurement error. That is, I have finally assembled an installation in which there is no loss of energy. But why is it needed if the energy consumption directly from the battery is exactly the same?
Completion
Let's finish the topic of very low water resistance. The Cell itself is not capable of working as a storage capacitor because water, which acts as a dielectric of a capacitor, cannot be one - it conducts current. In order for the process of electrolysis - decomposition into oxygen and hydrogen - to take place over it, it must be conductive. This results in an insoluble contradiction that can only be resolved in one way: Abandon the “Cell-capacitor” version. Accumulation in a Cell like a capacitor cannot occur, this is a Myth! If we take into account the area of the capacitor plates formed by the surfaces of the tubes, then even with an air dielectric the capacitance is negligible, but here water with its low active resistance acts as a dielectric. Don't believe me? Take a physics textbook and calculate the capacity.
It can be assumed that the accumulation occurs on the L1 coil, but this also cannot be due to the fact that its inductance is also very small for a frequency of the order of 10 kHz. The inductance of the transformer is several orders of magnitude higher. You might even think about why it was even “stuck” into the circuit with its low inductance.
Afterword
Someone will say that the miracle is in bifilar winding. In the form in which it is presented in Mayer’s patents, it will be of no use. Bifilar winding is used in protective power filters, not of the same conductor, but opposite in phase and is designed to suppress high frequencies. It is even available in all power supplies for computers and laptops without exception. And for the same conductor, bifilar winding is done in a wire-wound resistor to suppress the inductive properties of the resistor itself. Bifilar winding can be used as a filter that protects the output transistor, preventing powerful microwave pulses from entering the generator circuit, supplied from the source of these pulses directly to the Cell. By the way, coil L1 is an excellent filter for microwaves. The first pulse generator circuit, which uses a step-up transformer, is correct, only something is missing between the VT3 transistor and the Cell itself. This is what I will devote my next article to.
Mitchell Lee
LT Journal of Analog Innovation
Steep pulse sources that simulate a step function are often useful in some laboratory measurements. For example, if the slope of the fronts is on the order of 1...2 ns, you can estimate the rise time of the signal in the RG-58/U cable or any other, taking a segment only 3...6 m long. The workhorse of many laboratories - the ubiquitous HP8012B pulse generator - does not reach 5 ns, which is not fast enough to solve such a problem. Meanwhile, the rise and fall times of the gate driver outputs of some switching controllers can be less than 2 ns, making these devices potentially ideal pulse sources.
Figure 1 shows a simple implementation of this idea, based on the use of a flyback converter controller operating at a fixed switching frequency. The controller's own operating frequency is 200 kHz. Applying part of the output signal to the SENSE pin causes the device to operate at a minimum duty cycle, generating output pulses with a duration of 300 ns. Power decoupling is of no small importance for this circuit, since the output current supplied to a 50 Ohm load exceeds 180 mA. 10 µF and 200 ohm decoupling elements minimize peak distortion without sacrificing edge steepness.
The output of the circuit is connected directly to the 50 ohm terminated load, providing a signal swing of about 9 V across it. In cases where pulse quality is of paramount importance, it is recommended to suppress the triple pass signal by absorbing reflections from the cable and remote load using the series termination shown in the circuit. Series matching, that is, matching on the transmitting side, also turns out to be useful when the circuit operates on passive filters and other attenuators designed for a certain impedance of the signal source. The output impedance of the LTC3803 is approximately 1.5 ohms, which should be taken into account when choosing the value of the series terminating resistor. Series matching works well up to impedances of at least 2 kΩ, above which it becomes difficult to provide the necessary bandwidth at the resistor-to-circuit junction, resulting in degraded pulse quality.
In a series-matched system, the output signal has the following characteristics:
- pulse amplitude - 4.5 V;
- rise and fall times are the same and equal to 1.5 ns;
- pulse flat top distortion - less than 10%;
- the decline in the peak of the impulse is less than 5%.
When connecting a 50 ohm load directly, the rise and fall times are not affected. To get the best pulse shape, connect a 10uF capacitor as close as possible to the V CC and GND pins of the LTC3803, and connect the output directly to the terminating resistor using stripline technology. The characteristic impedance of approximately 50 ohms has a 2.5 mm wide printed conductor on a 1.6 mm thick double-sided printed circuit board.
Related materials
PMIC; DC/DC converter; Uin:5.7÷75V; Uout:5.7÷75V; TSOT23-6
Provider | Manufacturer | Name | Price |
---|---|---|---|
EIC | Linear Technology | LTC3803ES6-5#TRMPBF | 85 rub. |
Triema | Linear Technology | LTC3803ES6#PBF | 93 rub. |
LifeElectronics | LTC3803ES6-3 | on request | |
ElektroPlast-Ekaterinburg | Linear Technology | LTC3803HS6#PBF | on request |
- Linear Technology is generally a top company! It’s a very, very pity that they were gobbled up by consumer goods Analog Devices. Don't expect anything good from this. I previously came across an article by an English-speaking radio amateur. He assembled a generator of very short pulses with a width of a few nanoseconds and rise/fall times of picoseconds. On a very high-speed comparator. Sorry I didn't save the article. And now I can’t find it. It was called something like “...real ultrafast comparator...”, but somehow it’s not right, I can’t Google it. I forgot the name of the comparator, and I don’t remember its company. Then I found a comparator on ebay, it cost about 500 rubles, in principle, budgetary for a really worthy device. Linear Technology has very interesting microcircuits. For example LTC6957: rise/fall time 180/160 ps. Awesome! But I’m unlikely to be able to build a measuring device myself using such a device.
- Is this not the case on the LT1721? Tunable 0-10ns.