It would seem that these two cars are from different classes, so what could be the dilemma here? Duster is an SUV, and Rapid is a hatchback. But in terms of their cost and many other characteristics, not counting cross-country ability, the cars are close. Therefore, if you have the money, but are not sure whether to choose Renault Duster or Skoda Rapid, you should take a closer look at both models and understand what will be better in a particular case.
Design and dimensions
Both cars look aesthetically pleasing, but are not the epitome of polish in their respective categories. An experienced eye will immediately notice the modesty of the external decoration. But it cannot be said that this is some kind of drawback. Others fundamentally do not take models with a luxurious appearance for various reasons. Both models will appeal to people with such preferences, because neither Duster nor Rapid will stand out in the general flow of cars either in the city or on a country road.
Duster's shape is more strict, square. They emphasize the character of the car and its purpose. An SUV, according to many, should ideally look powerful, but at the same time, simple.
But the Rapid has smoother lines, typical of modern sedans and hatchbacks. But here we don’t see that pretentious smoothness that has become one of the modern trends.
In terms of weight, Duster is heavier than Rapid by about one and a half centners. The SUV weighs 1370 kilograms. Its height is also greater and reaches 1625 mm, which is approximately 150 mm higher than that of a car from Skoda. But the length of the hatchback is approximately the same as that of the Renault model, reaching 4483 mm.
The difference in wheelbase is less than 100 mm, in favor of Duster. It is not surprising that the ground clearance of the latter significantly exceeds that of the Rapid, reaching 210 mm versus 170 mm for the model from Skoda. But these indicators must be assessed, taking into account the class. Duster has good dimensions for an SUV, and Rapid has good dimensions for a hatchback. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Renault Duster is superior to its competitor, or that the Skoda Rapid looks like a better light.
Separately, it is worth mentioning about the trunk. This is really a parameter that can be compared without taking into account the specifics of the class. Both cars are intended, among other things, for travel, and therefore the trunk volume in both cases is extremely important.
If for Duster this is only 408 liters, then for Rapid it reaches all of 530 liters. This sets the hatchback apart, especially for those who prefer to travel exclusively on smooth country roads and never turn into difficult-to-pass places.
Salon of Skoda Rapid and Renault Duster
In terms of comfort, the Rapid's interior is somewhat superior to that of the Duster. At least this is what many people note. The Skoda model has virtually no disadvantages. You shouldn’t classify modest finishing as such, because for that kind of money you can’t expect anything else. But everything was done aesthetically.
Also, Rapid has a very convenient dashboard, comfortable seats and not bad review. In short, this hatchback is suitable for long journeys with family, which is difficult to say about the model from Renault. Rapid's design is both aesthetic and practical, which is clear to those who have already tried a lot different cars.
The same cannot be said about the Duster's interior. Where in it less comfort and aesthetics. In addition, there are more serious problems: The dashboard has a lot of glare when exposed to the sun. There is often little room for the driver's left leg. However, everything is not so bad if you consider the purpose of the machine.
Duster is the favorite car of those whose income is modest, but whose ambitions require dashing off-road driving. And many people are unlikely to consider any inconvenience in the interior of such a car as a disadvantage. Someone probably even thinks that this gives a certain “atmosphere” to the car, because overcoming difficulties is what Duster’s target audience often desires. And by the way, despite the fact that the instruments glare in the sun, the arrows are clearly visible.
But if you compare the interiors of the two cars, it becomes clear that the Skoda model in this regard is better than a regular Duster or even a Duster Privilege, because the Rapid provides a level of comfort that will be acceptable for all family members. But the model from Renault is not suitable for everyone.
Specifications
The filling, of course, varies. The difference in engine volume is significant: if the Rapid has only 1.4 liters, then the Duster has all 2 liters. So in this aspect, Renault has the advantage. The SUV is superior in power to the hatchback, producing a maximum of 143 hp. Skoda Rapid, on the other hand, demonstrates only 125 hp at the limit.
But Duster’s torque, on the contrary, is even slightly behind. If in a Renault car this figure reaches 195 N*m at 4000 rpm, then the Rapid demonstrates all 200 N*m at 4000 rpm. It's difficult to say which car has the better engine. Duster's power comes from its off-road nature. The hatchback can easily get by with the existing parameters. Volume fuel tank Rapid has a little more and is 55 liters versus 50 liters for Duster.
On the road, the model from Renault demonstrates less agility, because its acceleration time to 100 km/h is only 10.3 seconds. But the Skoda hatchback accelerates to the same speed in 9 seconds, which is a good indicator for a representative of this class.
The SUV's transmission includes six gears. The hatchback box offers seven gears. The car from Renault has all-wheel drive, while the brainchild of Skoda has front-wheel drive. Taking all this into account, it is not surprising that the SUV shows great agility off-road, but is not so nimble on the road.
Ultimately, every car deserves praise within its class. The characteristics of Renault Duster and Skoda Rapid are too different to not take into account the difference in classes. If the first car is perfect for singles who want a car for all occasions, then the second is an excellent choice for family people, especially taking into account the interior and trunk.
Price Skoda Rapid and Renault Duster
The cars are very close in price. Price for new Duster on average is 960,000 Russian rubles, and for Rapid - 1,000,000 rubles. This is reasonable money for acceptable quality. Duster – good car, as well as Rapid, it’s just important to understand what will fit better. And you shouldn’t look at the price in this matter.
Whatever the choice, be it the Skoda Rapid or the legendary Renault Duster, the main thing is that the car meets the owner’s goals.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is worth noting that it is impossible to say which car is better: Duster or Rapid. You just need to decide which car would be better suited in a specific case. Therefore, focusing on your goals, you can easily choose between these two similar, but still fundamentally different models.
Video
A wife is like this: if anything happens, you can get a divorce, but a car is for life. A similar saying was invented when cars were made well. And if by the word “quality factor” we mean the thickness of the metal, then the Czech Skoda Rapid liftback can be placed in first place. The VAZ Lada Vesta loses in this parameter, but in reality everything is not so simple... In addition, sales of the new generation Rapids will begin in June 2017, and the metal there may be thinner. And the Vesta sedan from the Skoda Rapid may differ in better side– the question is by what parameters to compare them.
Video with an attempt to compare prices: calling the dealer, etc.
Let us remember the words from the advertisement of the Vesta sedan: “a car for Russian roads" There is some truth in these words: it’s just that all competitors create cars for “greenhouse conditions.” The metal of the Skoda Rapid body is almost not deformed - it does not spring. On the one hand, we get a plus - an indestructible body, for which we have to pay with a high probability of chips.
But chips in the paint do not appear on their own. And if the car is operated carefully, everything should be in order.
Is Rapid an asphalt car?
The Rapid liftback should not go onto the dirt road. Causes:
- Paintwork is prone to chipping;
- The suspension is made for asphalt, it is rigid (the front is from a Fabia, the rear beam is from an Octavia sedan);
- The plastic in the cabin does not creak at all, but it is easily scratched (at VAZ it’s just the opposite).
Let's add to this that the 90-horsepower engine on the Rapid is much more responsive than the 106-horsepower engine on the Vesta. In general, Skoda produces good cars for the city.
Why is Skoda better?
The Lada Vesta sedan is still growing and growing before the Skoda Rapid... Many parameters of the Skoda will be better, even if you compare the basic versions.
It looks like gasoline will be suitable for the Skoda engine even with less octane number than for the VAZ-21127 engine... It is recommended, however, to pour only AI-95.
If 90 horsepower does not seem enough, you can buy a liftback with a 110-horsepower engine. True, for this you will have to pay 706 thousand, not 574.
AvtoVAZ still has two unconditional advantages: low price and affordable price maintenance. It needs to be carried out every 15 thousand km.
The external dimensions and interior volume of the two cars under consideration differ little. But the center of mass of the liftback is moved back. Bulk feed and reduced wheelbase- This is an argument in favor of poor cornering stability. That’s right: Vesta must be no worse in some ways!
The trunk volume of the Skoda Rapid is 530 liters. If folded rear seats, it will increase. Lada Vesta loses here - its value is 480 hp. But if the Rapid's trunk is properly loaded, the car goes into a skid when cornering.
Why are the disks different?
IN basic version Rapid liftbacks are being stamped 5J x 14 ET35. For Vesta there are 15-inch and 16-inch wheels. This all looks somehow uneconomical. Just for basic configuration buy tires in Belarus - the Belshina plant supplies tires with a diameter of 15 inches.
Belshina cast tires 15’’
Large-scale comparison review on one video
and pillows driver's seat compensates enough good profile backrest with massive side bolsters. Power window buttons are located on the driver's and passenger's front side doors. The finishing materials in the Renault Duster are not particularly high quality, which explains the relatively low cost of the SUV in the domestic market. automotive market. It is worth noting that the interior of the Duster is almost identical to the interior of the Renault Sandero. The front panel is almost entirely plastic, but it looks much more expensive. You need to pay attention to the huge number useful devices in a Czech car, such as cup holders in the doors and armrest. Passengers will be able to sit on the rear sofa, because there is plenty of room for both legs and heads. In a duel Skoda Yeti vs Renault Duster relatively interior design and comfort, we assign the victory to the Czech car.
Renault Duster and Skoda Karok are, at first glance, incomparable cars. The big difference in price and equipment offered makes the two crossovers completely different target audiences. But it’s still worth comparing them, because one thing can be said for sure - if both of these cars are sold (and assembled) in Russia, they will become bestsellers.
Design
Although Karok is considered the heir to the Yeti, it is difficult to find anything in common with " Bigfoot" He's much closer to big crossover Kodiak, a mini-version of which, in fact, is.
Renault Duster received a seriously redesigned exterior during the change of generations. It has become much more serious and solid than its predecessor due to a new radiator grille, optics and a modernized rear.
Size comparison between Skoda Karok and Renault Duster
The Karoq is larger than the Yeti in all dimensions, except for height. In terms of length (4382 mm), it also outstrips the Duster, which, when changing generation, remained virtually unchanged in terms of size. Its length is only 4315 mm, which is longer than that of the Yeti, but smaller than the Karok. As for the length of the wheelbase, for the Czech it is 2638 mm, and for Renault it is 2674 mm.
Trunk
Big luggage compartment- an advantage that for many buyers becomes the main one when choosing a new car. The Skoda Karok, like most of its “brothers” of the brand, is a record holder in this regard. The standard trunk size is 521 liters, and when folded rear seats, its volume increases to 1630 liters.
The performance of the 2nd generation Renault Duster looks very modest in comparison with these figures - standard size cargo compartment crossover is only 445 liters. And if you buy the all-wheel drive version of the model, then you will have 376 liters of luggage. It must be said that the Yeti Duster was inferior in terms of trunk volume. True, the difference there was not so significant - only 36 liters in favor of the Czech.
Video comparison Karoq vs Duster 2nd generation
Interior of Renault Duster and Skoda Karoq
With the change of generations of the Duster, Renault seriously worked on the decoration of its interior. But it still looks cheap.
As for the Karok, everything here is of German quality and accuracy, it’s not for nothing that Skoda has been among the VAG concern. In addition, on compact crossover For the first time, the brand introduced fans to a new “trick” that seriously increased the cost and modernized the interior - a virtual dashboard.
Comparison of Karok and new Duster interiors
Equipment of Karok and Duster
Renault Duster has always been inferior to most competitors in terms of available equipment. This is not surprising, because crossover manufacturers rely on low price, which is incompatible with rich in equipment. But the second generation should become a little more comfortable and safe.
It is not yet known what the equipment of the Russian Duster will be like after the change of generations, but in Europe they offer automatic air conditioning, a system remote lock doors, parking attendant, smart optics, multimedia system with a navigator and other previously unavailable options.
Skoda Karoq in any case, it outperforms its competitor in terms of equipment. He has not only standard ones for anyone modern car functions like three-zone climate control, but also more prestigious options, for example, fully LED optics and adaptive cruise control.
What's under the hood?
It’s difficult to say what engines and gearboxes the Renault Duster and Skoda Karoq will have in Russia. But you can compare European versions of crossovers. The Czech engine range includes 2 petrol and 2 diesel turbocharged units with a volume of 1-2 liters and a power of up to 150 hp. For the most powerful diesel(2.0 TDI 150 hp) provided all-wheel drive version. The crossover can be equipped with a manual transmission and a DSG robot.
U European Duster there are two atmospheric gasoline engines with a power of 115 and 125 hp. and diesel 1.5-liter turbo units with a capacity of 90 and 110 “horses”. The car is available in all-wheel drive and front-wheel drive versions.
Can the Duster and Karoq be driven off-road?
Of course, a definite answer to this question will only be given real tests. But you can try to predict the “off-road” behavior of crossovers by analyzing their ground clearance. For Duster it is 210 mm. The Karok is more focused on driving on asphalt - its ground clearance measured 183 mm. But we don’t recommend getting into real mud with either car.
Prospects and prices in Russia
Not yet updated Renault Duster, nor Skoda Karok Russian market not presented. However, the first one will definitely “reach” our country - approximately, it will be possible to buy it at the end of 2018 or at the beginning of 2019. European version will not only change the logo from Dacia to Renault, but also change the range of engines and gearboxes. With Karoq everything is more complicated. Skoda still hasn’t decided whether to offer this crossover to Russians. But in any case, you shouldn’t expect it in Russia before 2019.
As for prices, after the change of generations, Renault Duster, according to experts, will rise in price by about 50,000 rubles. Now it is sold at a price of 619,000 rubles. It’s difficult to guess how much the Skoda Karoq will cost if it is still sold in Russia, but it will definitely be much more than the Duster and will start in the range between 1,200,000 and 1,400,000 rubles.
Introductory - for 2 years 65 thousand. For every 100 km - 15% of the mileage on terrible dirt roads, shaking and off-road, on a good highway the speed is 130-150 mph, urban mode 30% of the mileage. Average consumption 9,8
Maximum has everything required options, the lowest price among competitors.
I am happy with the cruise control, anti-corrosion protection and the way the car “holds” the road (well, the tires are not the last place)
Passable, never got stuck yet. although there are places (forest, field 2 times per trip, snow and showers in the assortment). Yes, it’s not a Niva or a Sheviniva (I have experience mixing “shit”), so sometimes you need to look at the road and adequately assess the situation.
There were reviews about poor heating, the butt warms quickly and hot, the stove quickly brings heat into the cabin, and maintains the temperature at speed 1. I categorically don’t like the air conditioner, but if necessary it works fine, especially in the city when it’s hot.
The machine is utilitarian and fully fulfills the assigned tasks of a semi-rural resident. A sort of simple and understandable comfortable mini-truck.
To those who blaspheme Duster, I’ll say - buy yourself a Ferarri (though it’ll cost you 5 kopecks to find one), and drive along our roads with potholes and ruts. Or think before buying what you are taking and what you need it for.
I hardly use the function " free hands". I can hear perfectly, but I’m practically not there. Weak microphone.
- poor visibility in the rear view mirror. Especially if there is a passenger whose head almost completely blocks the right rear “window”. Although I have a “ski” and visibility from the left side post to the right. Make the situation easier side mirrors. They are good, there is no need to reconfigure when parking.
- maybe not "-" underestimated speed readings by 4 km/h
- on dashboard no engine temperature readings, sometimes annoying in winter
- drove into a puddle after heavy rain- the check light came on. I already gave up on fixing it.
- in winter you need to control the gas tank cap, do not open or close it after washing
- lack of rubber seals in the right places. All the dust is "in itself." Especially when opening rear doors, all the arches are dusty, you go around and wipe them with a cloth. I installed it for money sealing gum on the hood, engine and engine compartment became cleaner.
- about short passes- read the “textbook” (instructions). The first one is for off-road conditions and a loaded vehicle (+ trailer). I'm starting from the second one. The fifth and sixth ones have a large range, no unnecessary movements are necessary.
Almost every 15 thousand I change the front or rear stabilizer struts. Perhaps the off-road shaking is making itself felt.
- under warranty, replacement of the residual oxygen sensor (lambda probe) for 30 thousand
- under warranty, the body was repainted in fragments (cracks in the LPK gutters on both sides, chips from gravel on rear arches and wings) for 45 thousand. For money they glued armored film to the arches.
- I replaced burnt-out low beam lamps 4 times. It is especially hemorrhoidal to change the right one.
- changing oil and filters according to the maintenance schedule.
