When choosing a crossover, a lot of questions and doubts arise as to which brand and model is better to give preference to. The assortment is really huge, which makes life much more difficult for the buyer.

To dwell on one of the options, it would be logical to compare competing cars that potentially attract and satisfy the buyer according to the main criteria. By comparing the two cars, you can draw the appropriate conclusions and finally make a final decision.

It cannot be denied that there are SUVs available on the market that look equally attractive, have decent technical characteristics and rich equipment. It is difficult to determine a favorite between them, since each person pursues certain goals, has personal preferences and his own taste.

In this case, two Japanese crossovers will be considered,. This is the CX-5 from Mazda and the Qashqai from Nissan.

General information

The new generation Nissan Qashqai officially debuted in 2014. This is the second generation of the model, which is a bestseller in Europe and Russia. In March 2017, a re-styled version was introduced, within which the design was slightly changed, the interior was improved, the steering system was modernized and a number of other smaller adjustments were made.

Another update, but already technical, appeared in the fall of 2018. Alas, this did not affect Russian consumers in any way. Moreover, after restyling, a diesel engine is no longer offered in Russia. Only gasoline engines remained in the ICE line.

The basis for creating a new generation of Qashqai is the modular CMF platform. Moreover, Qashqai was the first model that was assembled on this cart.

The second generation Mazda CX-5 was presented in November 2016. Moreover, experts note that the change of generation is more like a deep restyling. Judge for yourself, because the new crossover is being built simply on a somewhat modernized platform. The car received more modern equipment, but there were no significant visual changes.

Mazda is based on the first generation platform, but with some modifications. The body is made on the basis of high-strength steel, which made it possible to increase the torsional rigidity.

Both crossovers are classified as compact SUVs. At the same time, the Mazda representative turned out to be somewhat larger than his opponent. This is confirmed by the corresponding dimensions.

The Nissan Qashqai has the following dimensions:

• length 4377 mm .;
• height 1590 mm .;
• width 1806 mm .;
• wheelbase 2646 mm.;
• ground clearance (clearance) 200 mm.

Mazda with its CX-5 crossover meets the following parameters:

• length 4555 mm .;
• width 1840 mm .;
• height 1670 mm .;
• wheelbase 2700 mm.;
• clearance (ground clearance) 215 mm.

If you are in doubt about which one is better to stop your choice, choosing between Mazda CX 5 or Nissan Qashqai, we recommend that you study the cars according to different parameters and draw appropriate conclusions.

Exterior

When comparing the new generation Nissan Qashqai after restyling with many competitors, the latter had no chance, since the Qashqai looks really cool, modern and European.

But it turned out to be much more difficult to compare such cars as Nissan Qashqai and Mazda СХ5. It is almost impossible to single out a clear favorite.

Mazda looks more brutal, has muscular forms. It's more of a mid-size SUV than a compact crossover. This is the impression that is created when looking at this car.

The new global design of KODO has made the new Mazda vehicles one of the most striking and recognizable on the international stage. It is difficult not to notice such a car in the stream. Although there are those who consider such an exterior design unfortunate and ugly.

It is extremely difficult and practically impossible to objectively judge the appearance. Qashqai meets Mazda with no less muscular forms, stylish solutions, neat lines, original front and rear optics. Really modern and youthful car.

Here, everyone must rely on their own taste and personal design preferences. But it cannot be denied that the design of the Qashqai and CX-5 are distinctive, beautiful and unlike many other competitors in their class. The designers did their best, and here we put a confident equal sign.

Interior and luggage compartment

Inside, Qashqai looks European. Restrained in places, solid and bright in places. The balance between the quality of the materials used and the ergonomics is at a high level. Due to the use of large elements in the interior, the car looks richer.

The owners are attracted by a comfortable multifunctional steering wheel, a well-thought-out center console, and a well-designed dashboard. Sometimes it seems that there are too many buttons and controls. Moreover, each of them takes its place, without interfering with the management of other nodes and systems.

The salon is five-seater, the back can accommodate three adults, although not with a huge margin of legroom. Much depends on the size of the passenger himself. The rear sofa has 3 headrests and 3 dedicated seats. Although the pillows themselves are flat, they are quite stiff. Here Nissan made a mistake, and the rear sofa should be redone after the next update.

There are absolutely no complaints about the Qashqai front seats. Wide range of adjustments, optimal rigidity, pronounced lateral support. Sitting on such chairs is a pleasure.

Mazda CX-5 responds with no less profitable solutions in the cabin. The dashboard is made in a minimalist style, which is due to the presence of a large multimedia touch screen in the center of 7 inches. In front of the driver is a stylish three-spoke multifunction steering wheel, and behind it is a combination of devices, complemented by a 4.6-inch on-board computer screen. The central tunnel separating the driver and the front passenger also looks harmonious.

The build level is extremely decent, the interior is based on high quality materials. With its dimensions and positioning as a 5-seater crossover, the rear sofa for some reason has a pronounced division into 2 seats, albeit with 3 headrests. That is, sitting in the middle is not very profitable.

The front and rear seats have good lateral support, the right stiffness and a wide range of adjustments. The stock of legroom is solid. Together on the back sofa, you can feel as imposing as possible. But even three adults will be accommodated here without any problems.

The luggage compartment in the second generation Mazda CX5 in the stowed position holds up to 403 liters of cargo up to the waist line. The back row can be lowered to create a level floor. As a result, the volume of the luggage compartment increases to 1560 liters. In the underground there is a niche with a full size spare wheel. The tailgate itself, if you pay extra, gets an electric drive and remote control.

Despite the slightly larger dimensions of Mazda, the trunk in the Qashqai was larger. Normally, it has 430 liters, and when the rear row of seats is folded, 1585 liters are obtained. The floor is perfectly flat, and underneath is a niche with a full-size spare wheel.

In both cases, the interior is thought out correctly, organically and has a high level of practicality. Outwardly, everything looks great, in line with European trends and traditional Japanese quality.

Despite the Qashqai's slightly superior trunk space, Mazda responds by providing more rear seat space. At the same time, the Mazda rear sofa is formatted for 2 passengers, while the Nissan has three seats. There is also the downside of the Qashqai's overly stiff filler, while the CX-5 has optimal stiffness and lateral support.

And if we sum up the results in terms of the interior and trunks, then we can give the preponderance to Mazda. Still, the level of comfort is higher, and the 27 liters difference in the luggage compartment is not as significant as the increased rigidity of the rear sofa. Ahead in both cases, everything is great.

Motors and gearboxes

In the confrontation between Mazda CX 5 VS Nissan Qashqai, it is impossible to determine the leader based only on the interior and exterior. Therefore, the analysis of the proposed power units and will become a logical continuation of the comparison.

After the restyling of Russian buyers, Nissan Qashqai was deprived of the opportunity to take a diesel engine. This naturally upset many, since the engine had good dynamics and, at the same time, consumed very little fuel.

As a result, there were only 2 gasoline engines left to choose from.

• The base for Qashqai is a turbocharged 1.2-liter internal combustion engine with 4 cylinders. It generates 115 horsepower and 190 Nm. For such a motor, a six-speed manual box or a variator, devoid of steps, is offered.
• The older engine is naturally aspirated. There are also 4 working cylinders, but the volume is already 2.0 liters. Of these, 144 horsepower and 200 Nm of torque are squeezed out. Such an internal combustion engine can be equipped with a six-speed mechanics and the same variator. But the variator also allows you to take an all-wheel drive modification.

Comparing the Nissan Qashqai VS Mazda CX-5 will not be correct if you are initially looking for a crossover with maximum power. Here Mazda takes the lead, offering also only 2 petrol engines. Both are atmospheric and belong to the Skyactive G.

1. The base engine is a 2.0 liter, 4-cylinder, 16-valve engine. It gives out 150 horsepower and 210 Nm of torque. That is, the base engine Mazda surpasses the top-end engine from Qashqai. A choice of a six-speed manual and a six-speed automatic. Also, the car can go with full or only front-wheel drive, regardless of the box.
2. The top engine for Russia is a 2.5-liter 4-cylinder aspirated engine with a return of 194 horsepower and 256 Nm of torque. Here, in terms of gearboxes and drives, there is no need to choose. There is no alternative to such an engine combined only with an automatic machine and all-wheel drive.

Purely in terms of power, Mazda looks like an obvious favorite. But power is not always the key to the consumer. Many are willing to sacrifice horsepower for lower fuel consumption.

Fuel consumption and dynamics

Let's start with the Nissan Qashqai, and look at its dynamics and fuel consumption:

• The junior engine with mechanics and variator accelerates from zero to hundred in 10.9 and 12.9 seconds, respectively. At the same time, fuel consumption is 5.6 and 6.2 liters per 100 km for the manual transmission and the variator in the combined cycle.
• The senior motor on mechanics reaches 100 km / h in 9.9 seconds, consuming an average of 7.7 liters of fuel per 100 km. With a variator, acceleration takes 10.1 and 10.5 seconds with front and all-wheel drive, and consumption varies between 6.9-7.3 liters per 100 km of distance traveled.

The maximum speed for the Nissan Qashqai depends on the engine, gearbox and drive. The slowest version accelerates to 173 km / h. This is a junior motor with a variator. And the maximum is given by a 2.0-liter internal combustion engine with mechanics, which develops 194 km / h.

The dynamics of the Mazda СХ5 are naturally better. Although the superiority was not as significant as some expected to see. The younger engine accelerates in about 9.4 seconds from 0 to 100 kilometers per hour. The top engine can accelerate in 7.9 seconds. The maximum speed is from 187 to 197 kilometers per hour.

On a combined cycle, a car consumes between 6.2 and 7.3 liters of gasoline per 100 kilometers of road.

As a result, it turns out that the CX-5 goes faster, has superiority in top speed and dynamics. But what is most surprising is the fact that Mazda's gas mileage was lower, based on the passport data, than that of Qashqai with initially more powerful engines.

Many people rightly point out that the Qashqai lacks power for its weight. If you add at least another 20-30 hp. in the base engine, the situation will improve significantly. But we have what we have.

In terms of dynamics and fuel consumption, the favorite was a car made by Mazda. The CX-5 has good dynamics, optimal power for its size, and is fuel efficient. This is a huge merit of modern Skyactive G engines, which, without the use of turbocharging, using conventional atmospheric technology, demonstrate exemplary performance.

Cross-country ability and handling

Mazda СХ5 behaves and feels superiority at any speed, including those that exceed the permitted limits. The suspension can be called elastic and rather knocked down. The actuation on serious obstacles is not perfectly smooth, but the driver, along with the passengers, can feel it.

When driving, people in front and behind feel equally well. Due to its high ground clearance, the Mazda passes well over small curbs and pits.

The steering is quite sharp and obedient, it reacts in time to the slightest changes in the position of the steering wheel. Thanks to the numerous electronics, Mazda is easy to operate, reliably and calmly.

The competitor's suspension, if we compare the capabilities of Mazda СХ5 and Nissan Qashqai cars, has some flaws and claims. Suspension tuning is clearly aimed at maximum comfort in urban conditions, and in this comparison Nissan is only slightly ahead of Mazda. As a result, the Qashqai is soft and quiet when passing through small bumps. But if the car turns out to be in deep holes, unpleasant knocks immediately appear. A sharp maneuver is followed by a noticeable roll, which negatively affects the sharpness of the steering. The ground clearance, although it has a solid 200 mm, is not enough for off-road conditions. Forced Nissan can drive through a difficult section, but deliberately should not go there.

Security options

Both crossovers from Japanese automakers have received an extensive list of systems and options that are responsible for active and passive safety. These include:

• airbags;
• Break Assist and more.

Even in the basic configuration, both cars have 6 airbags.

Naturally, both cars received 5 stars from the EuroNCAP laboratory. Therefore, in the context of safety, there is fair equality between the two crossovers under consideration.

Cost and configuration

Nissan Qashqai was initially positioned as a more affordable car than the Mazda CX5. This is due to the fact that the Mazda brand itself is more expensive, judging by the entire lineup. Plus the CX-5 is bigger, has more powerful motors and other reasons for raising the starting price tag.

For Russia, Qashqai is available in 10 trim levels. The simplest version will cost at least 1.3 million rubles. The minimum set of equipment (XE equipment) with all-wheel drive will cost from 1.6 million rubles.

Top-end versions with a 2.0-liter engine, CVT and front-wheel drive start at 1.9 million rubles. You won't be able to buy an all-wheel drive version for less than 2 million rubles.

In the case of the Mazda СХ5, Russian consumers are offered 3 equipment options. These are the Drive, Active and Supreme trim levels. In the initial version, the car costs from 1.6 million rubles, that is, approximately the same as the average level of the competitor's equipment.

Top versions of the crossover from Mazda cost from 2.2 million rubles. A really rich and almost fully equipped version of an SUV can be taken for 2.5 million rubles.

Who to give preference to

At the end of this comparison, you need to answer the question of what is better when you have a Nissan Qashqai and Mazda CX5 in front of you.

Both cars look decent and definitely qualify for your garage. But it is extremely difficult to name a favorite. Each crossover showed a certain superiority over a competitor, and lost somewhere to him. To summarize, the more victories were on the side of Mazda.

The CX-5 has a striking design like the Qashqai. At the same time, the Mazda interior, albeit a little, but turned out to be better. Mazda also offers more modern engines with excellent power output, decent dynamics and exemplary economy. The engine power for the Qashqai is less, the dynamics are worse, but there is still no superiority in fuel consumption.

Plus, the Mazda crossover has better cross-country ability, it copes more confidently with difficult road sections, feels good in off-road conditions, although it is positioned as a city SUV. It is not recommended to deliberately get into such conditions on Qashqai. The car will not go everywhere.

Yes, the cost of the CX-5 is higher. But there are a number of objective reasons for this. In terms of trim levels, Nissan did better by offering more equipment as standard. But this is not a reason to give the palm to Nissan's crossover. For all the advantages and disadvantages, the Mazda CX-5 is the winner in this comparison. Although Nissan Qashqai lost, but it is a decent and very good car, demonstrating all over the world, including the Russian market.

These cars belong to the crossover segment and represent a popular solution among many car enthusiasts. The crossover is a kind of intermediate link between massive SUVs and compact passenger cars.

The main advantages of such cars are considered to be that they allow you to expand your range of potential target use. Crossovers quite successfully cope not only with medium-quality asphalt pavement, but also allow the owner to drive off-road.

In terms of comfort and controllability, crossovers are not inferior to passenger cars, and in terms of technological components and cross-country performance, they have much in common with full-fledged SUVs.

The objects of our comparison today will be the Mazda CX-5 crossover, which was introduced in 2011, and the popular 2013 Nissan Qashqai. Versions of the models have diesel and gasoline engines, gearboxes are represented by an automatic and manual transmission.

The most popular crossover options from Nissan and Mazda are configurations equipped with a diesel internal combustion engine and automatic transmission. They will become the subject of our further comparison.

Mazda CX-5

The crossover model from the Japanese corporation Mazda turned out to be harmonious and complete. The car fully embodied the latest philosophical concept of the company, which was named KODO, which literally means "moving soul".

The main features of the external appearance of the model include the presence of muscular wheel arches, which are made in the form of smooth lines that do not have sharp bends or corners. The side part of the Mazda CX-5 looks noticeably stricter, in the upper third of the body, in the area above the outer door handles, there is a strict straight line. This gives the profile an air of swiftness and assertiveness, and the arches emphasize the aerodynamic component. However, to match the overall picture, the lower part of the doors has a slightly rounded line, which adds to the harmony. The sloping roof also serves this purpose, hinting at the excellent streamlining of the body with air currents when driving.

Narrow head optics and a large stylized grille, shaped like a shield, are able to bring a note of seriousness and efficiency into the overall look of the crossover. The front part cannot be called extremely aggressive, but there are no clearly expressed friendly features in it either.

The rear end, traditionally for Mazda, is made in a sporty style. The massive two-piece bumper is distinguished by its clear-cut relief at its lower part, which is made of unpainted black plastic. The upper part completely complements the overall concept of the body. Tapered tail lights and chrome-plated tailpipes give the austerity. The spoiler on the 5th body door finally reinforces the feeling of speed and power.

Nissan qashqai

This model of the Japanese brand has been familiar to motorists for a long time. Throughout its history, the Nissan Qashqai crossover has been modernized more than once.

The crossover was originally created in Europe, with a pronounced focus on European markets. Qashqai is a successful combination of many engineering and design solutions. The front end of the crossover has turned out to be quite strict and well recognizable.

Particularly noteworthy is the head optics, on which the designers have entrusted a significant load to create an overall impression of the appearance of the car. Designed for daytime use, the LED daytime running lights have taken on the form of a recognizable "boomerang", qualitatively raising the visual impression of the front of the crossover to a new level.

The lines of the bonnet give the overall look an elegance and make a strong impression, making one unwittingly expect considerable performance characteristics from the car, although this is not so.

The side profile of the model is made quite standard, following the most modern trends in the global automotive industry. A sloping roof sloping to the rear with rails, and a straight line stamped in the center of the doors along the entire body: such solutions can often be found.

Separately, it is worth mentioning the rear optics of the Nissan Qashqai. This exterior element is intended to set the model apart from other co-platforms in the Nissan series. The main feature of the solution is that the headlights significantly bend the car body, invading from the rear into the side profile space of the fenders, giving the stern volume.

Looking at both cars, it is impossible to unconditionally hand over the palm to one of them. Each model has turned out to be very graceful, stylish and individual. Crossovers from Nissan and Mazda are designed for the widest audience of buyers. The design uses carefully verified and balanced modern solutions, thanks to which the standard platforms received their expressiveness and individuality. At the same time, the classic traditions of modern automobile construction and body design have been fully preserved. However, having put both cars side by side, Mazda CX-5 is still half a step ahead. The general concept of the car is better traced in this model. The balance between the front, side and rear exteriors is more harmonious and styled than the Nissan Qashqai.

Salon

Nissan qashqai

Interior details Nissan Qashqai immediately attract with their appearance. The front part of the torpedo turned out to be soft over almost the entire area, which was a wonderful solution. During operation, you should not expect the appearance of extraneous noise, the fit of the elements, like the materials themselves, is impressive. In the general layout of the interior, something from the premium Nissan Infiniti is guessed, many details have received peculiar roundings, creating a sense of integrity and unity with the space for the driver and his passengers.

There are several options for seating and ceiling finishes. It can be either fabric upholstery or leather.

Seat profile made in the best European traditions, the pillows are moderately hard, hold the rider well. Lateral support is well developed, and the back in the upper and lower parts does not tend to get tired after a long ride. The driver's seat has a wide range of adjustments in various planes. The back sofa is spacious, the profile is good. Door cards, traditionally for pricing purposes, are made of hard plastic.

Armrest is based on a deep niche in which bottle containers can be placed. This solution became available due to the fact that the constructively classic layout of the parking brake is absent, freeing up space.

Center console and the dashboard is made in a classic style, no solutions deviating from the standard have been noticed. All attention is focused on the multimedia system, which can be a sensor solution in the middle trim levels, and a conventional audio system in the initial versions of the vehicle's equipment. The next element is the information display of the air conditioner. Here, too, everything is pretty standard. An on-board computer screen is located between the instrument wells. It is colored, with a working diagonal of 5 inches.

Illumination of devices and functional elements is made in a soft blue glow, which is combined with white and orange tones, rather reminiscent of an amber hue. All readings are fairly easy to read in all lighting conditions, significantly increasing comfort and the level of interaction with devices and crossover systems. By the way, the area around the gearshift knob is equipped with amber illumination.

Noise isolation is above average, which is surprising for a Japanese car. This characterizes the model as aimed at European markets, where acoustic comfort is an important component. Improvement of this factor contributed to the fact that the overall sound of the acoustics changed. The bass note of medium depth can be traced, and the sonic attack in the cabin is clear and pronounced.

Steering column adjustments allow you to adjust the reach and height. It will be possible for almost any driver to settle in comfortably. The steering wheel, traditionally for a modern car, is a multifunctional element. The control is realized quite conveniently, the size of the steering buttons is sufficient, the material of their manufacture is pleasant and does not slip under the fingers, the presses are soft and smooth.

Ergonomics claims internal space does not arise. All buttons, adjustment and control elements, functional niches and compartments are located quite conveniently. The careful work of the team of designers and engineers is noticeable, who thoroughly thought out each functional solution regarding the ergonomics and convenience of being in the car.

Mazda CX-5

The interior of the Mazda CX-5 promises a lot. The first impression is positive. All details are of high quality, without sharp corners. You can observe a certain inclination of designers to round off the shapes that make up the internal component of the crossover.

Front console made of soft plastic. Looks expensive and solid. Fitting of details at the highest level, all elements are monolithic and integrated in their places. Some structural strength is felt, which excludes the appearance of extraneous sounds when driving, especially on poor quality road surfaces. The multimedia system has taken a major role in the central part. We placed the screen so that it is slightly recessed inward. This is very convenient, since the "visor" formed on top excludes glare and glare. There is a shelf under the screen. The system can optionally have a navigation function.

Backlight devices are realized in white, in shade it resembles a moon. The climate window is highlighted in reddish-orange, which is a characteristic solution in the traditional Mazda style.

Seating vehicles have ample opportunity to adjust the lower cushion and upper backrest in different planes. They are made of high-quality fabric, which causes pleasant sensations when touched. The seats are also available in leather or in a fabric / leather combination.

A driver of any body size and almost any height will be able to accommodate qualitatively and comfortably. The lower cushion is very comfortable, the whole thigh part seems to be resting. The backrest of the front seats has an excellent profile, lateral support reliably holds the back, eliminating excessive body displacement in turns.

Armrest at Mazda it is comfortable, it provides reliable support. In length, this element is quite enough, the hand does not hang down. But the functional niche is not very deep, it is already more difficult to place the overall containers with drinks.

Sound insulation quality Mazda CX-5 is at a sufficient and acceptable level. The noise from small stones and sandblasting of wheel arches is slightly distinguishable in motion, but the interior space is well insulated from other extraneous sounds from the outside. The roar of the engine begins to bother only outside the mid-range.

Multifunction steering wheel this model fits comfortably in the hand. The steering column allows you to adjust the reach and height. Paired with seat adjustments, getting comfortable in the driver's seat is easy.

Ergonomics of the model is at a very high level. All function keys and controls are in place. It is enough just to reach out to almost all significant controls.

It should be noted that the information window of the air conditioner is quite small, it is not always convenient to read the information, so this element will require some getting used to.

With many similar features and quality indicators, the interior of the Nissan Qashqai in high trim levels looks more modern and technologically advanced than the solution from Mazda. It is worth considering the fact that the Mazda CX-5 appeared earlier than the model from Nissan, and the question of time is very important for technological progress. If we compare the configurations close to the basic ones, then Mazda is in no way inferior to its more modern competitor.

Driving performance

Mazda CX-5

A crossover with a high-torque diesel heart is a dream for any of the motorists. This type of internal combustion engine, coupled with a perfectly tuned suspension, provides the Mazda CX-5 with outstanding performance and driving performance. Even at those speeds that are far ahead of the permitted ones, the car behaves confidently. The suspension is knocked down and elastic, on serious obstacles and potholes it works out, although not quite imposingly and gently, but it does not come to breakdown or unpleasant sounds. Both front and rear passengers feel comfortable. Clearance allows you to attack low curbs and minor holes.

The steering wheel is sharp, the car obediently and predictably reacts to the slightest wiggle of the steering wheel. A large number of electronic active safety systems make driving in Mazda reliable, calm and comfortable. The only caveat is the lack of proper reactive effort on the steering wheel when picking up speed. Information content is lost a little, but this is not a problem, rather, just a matter of habit.

There are no questions about the brake system, all settings are predictable. The car's brakes are excellent.

Nissan qashqai

Power and torque, please note, is not the most voluminous diesel engine, Nissan Qashqai is enough. Both in the city and on the highway, it is quite possible to dynamically accelerate and maneuver.

But there is a certain list of complaints about the implementation of the suspension functions. All undercarriage assemblies are clearly tuned for comfort. The suspension is soft and quiet on small irregularities, but when the wheel hits the pit deeper, a dull knock appears. This is not a breakthrough yet, but it is close to that. It turns out a kind of payback for comfort. With sharp maneuvers, slight rolls are observed, which affects the sharpness of taxiing and overall controllability. The crossover is clearly focused on calm urban driving, as evidenced by its clearance. Departure on light off-road is understood rather as a forced necessity, rather than a specific goal.

In the track mode, active electronic assistants, although they try to improve the situation by keeping the car on a given trajectory, but the feeling that the car is rolling does not leave you when driving at slightly higher speeds.

The crossover brakes confidently, no nuances were revealed here. Tuning of braking systems at a high level.

Both cars show excellent dynamics for their class and provide a comfortable and reliable ride. Mazda pulls ahead slightly ahead of Nissan in handling and power characteristics. Qashqai is the preferred option for comfort and leisure in urban environments. If you intend to operate a crossover for high-speed driving on highways, you are planning trips on light off-road terrain, then you should pay more attention to the CX-5 model.

Spaciousness

Both models are practically equal in their overall dimensions. The slightly larger wheelbase of the Mazda CX-5 allows you to win a small headroom. Both models have ample headroom and width in the front row. The back row allows you to comfortably accommodate two adult passengers, three are already cramped. There is plenty of legroom for the back row.

It should be separately taken into account the fact that in the front passenger seat and in the back row, the space above the head may not be enough for those people whose height is at around 190 cm and above. This is due to the design feature of the falling roof of both Mazda and Nissan.

The trunk of the Mazda CX-5 allows you to get 443 liters of usable volume. The rear seats fold down easily, giving access to an almost flat floor of 1.7 meters in length and a maximum of 1560 liters, which is an impressive figure.

The trunk of the Nissan Qashqai is capable of providing a volume of 430 liters. Folding the back row, we get 1585 liters, respectively.

Fuel consumption

Fuel efficiency of the crossovers is at a high level, considering that both vehicles have excellent dynamic characteristics. Particularly surprising is the crossover from Mazda, which is distinguished by outstanding power at a fairly low diesel consumption.

Security

Crossovers Mazda CX-5 and Nissan Qashqai have a rich set of active and passive safety systems. The list includes: ABS, ESP stability control, traction control ASR, HAC hill start assist, Brake Assist and many others. In the base, the cars received from 6 Airbag airbags. Both crossovers have 5 stars out of 5 possible according to the results of tests of the Euro NCAP laboratory.

Two diesels, two crossovers, two new items. Who's better? Our source compared the objective key characteristics of two popular Japanese models. Scrupulously and with a calculator. And also - vivid sensations from driving, comfort, appearance and other car delights. Subjective, but honest.

According to our source, in the popularity rating Nissan Qashqai and Mazda CX-5 are next to each other. They are in the top ten in their sales class. But this is in the overall standings, which, among other things, includes the recently appeared new diesel Nissan Qashqai and the diesel Mazda CX-5, which has been on sale since the spring of this year. Both of these models belong to the C SUV Volume class - the mid-price category of mid-range crossovers. Therefore, we will compare them to the fullest extent - the middle class should know what it pays for.

Our source tested diesel Nissan Qachqai New and diesel Mazda CX-5. Nissan Qashqai with a 1.6-liter engine producing 130 hp. and a stepless CVT variator in full minced meat for 446 thousand UAH. But! It was July 18th. Today - August 15th, this model costs 488,160 UAH. Therefore, we write: the equivalent of $ 37,000.

The test Mazda CX-5 was equipped with a 2.2-liter 175 hp engine. and a 6-speed automatic gearbox in full minced meat for UAH 492,700. But! It was August 1st. Today is August 15th, this model already costs UAH 513,500. Therefore, we write: the equivalent of $ 41,000.

Total: regardless of the course, the difference is $ 4 thousand.

Outside and inside
We will not argue about the appearance. It's a matter of taste if you have one. We can only say that the design of the Qashqai is newer than that of the Mazda CX-5, which appeared in 2012, and therefore Nissan attracts more attention, looks fresher. But this phenomenon is temporary and after half a year, the novelty of Qashqai will naturally disappear. And there, you see, the CX-5 will be updated. The facelift version has already been shown in spy photos. Therefore, it is worth comparing objective indicators. For example, crossover sizes inside and out.

The difference in price does not imply that the Mazda CX-5 has to be bigger, because it is more expensive. But it is so: the CX-5 has a length of 4555 mm, and the Qashqai has a length of 4377 mm. The Mazda is also slightly larger in width. But the main thing is that the Mazda CX-5 has a slightly larger wheelbase: 2700 mm versus 2646 mm for the Qashqai. These 5 cm are not superfluous at all. First, they compensate for the larger volume that Mazda's four-wheel drive takes (the diesel Qashqai has front-wheel drive). Secondly, the trunk volume of the CX-5 is 443 liters, while the Qashqai has 400 liters. But the main thing is that the CX-5 has more space in the cabin. Although the Qashqai salon cannot be called cramped, the CX-5 has more space.

The interior design is also more modern for the Nissan Qashqai. And many passengers liked it better. I must say that the exterior and interior design of the new Qashqai is one of the best, if not the best in its class. But, in full "stuffing" in the diesel Mazda CX-5, the design of a boring and somewhat old-fashioned interior is brilliantly enlivened by the red stitching on the leather seats.

If we compare the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan Qashqai in terms of the level of equipment and all sorts of fashionable and not very bells and whistles, then the light of the Mazda CX-5 in the test complete Premium package is excellent - bi-xenon. There is a parking sensor with a video camera that work correctly and accurately, without raising an alarm a “kilometer” before an obstacle. Navigation knows everything. In any case, in Kiev we did not find any “blank spots” on the map. And she prompts the turns in time. The Bose audio system was not at all superfluous in the complete "stuffing" of the test CX-5.

Many people like the panoramic glass roof on the Nissan Qashqai, which was included in the test package. In addition, the Nissan Qashqai received a 360-degree view system, similar to the Infinit FX. The new Nissan Qashqai also has a blind spot monitoring system. When someone catches up to you on the right or left, lamps come on in the cabin at the level of the exterior mirrors. The optics of the Nissan Qashqai are also premium: both front and rear LEDs, and in the top versions - xenon. What I liked especially in the summer was the cold air cooling of the driver's and passenger's cup holders that was turned on, if necessary.

That is, according to the trim levels of both crossovers, it is easier to say what they do not have in full stuffing. By the way, both leather seats are heated (which is important in winter), but they do not have ventilation (which is important in summer).

By and large, most of the equipment you've just read about is what passengers most often pay attention to. The driver has other joys.

Comfort
The fact that there is a diesel under the hood of Mazda is understandable only to the driver who knows about it and feels excellent traction and throttle response. The torque of the CX-5 motor of 420 Nm is something.

Neither vibration nor the characteristic diesel sound can be heard in the cabin. The engine compartment is perfectly insulated. Such insulation would still be for the underbody and wheel arches. But this is a feature of all Mazda, which you get used to very quickly and stop noticing. Moreover, in the new Mazda lineup, they have seriously worked on creating silence in the cabin.

Do not affect the ride comfort and misunderstandings on our roads. The suspension of the Mazda CX-5 is excellent. On the track, she confidently holds and drives the car at a good speed (much higher than the highest allowed on our roads). Although, objectively, after 130 km / h the gas pedal CX-5 loses its former responsiveness.

On the pits and "police" the suspension resiliently with the sound of reliability is triggered without discomfort even for rear passengers. Off-road (relative) Mazda CX-5 behaves like a well-trained urban tourist. Ground clearance 210 mm, four-wheel drive, powerful diesel torque. You won't get stuck.

In the Nissan Qashqai, the diesel runs relatively quietly. Although, there are lounges and quieter, where it is not clear whether the engine is on or not. With Qashqai, it's understandable. During normal driving, you get used to this quiet rumble and do not notice. When overtaking, when the revolutions exceed 2500 per minute, the sound of the engine is already heard well. But not so much that you have to shout over him. That is, the soundproofing of the cabin is normal.

But the suspension could be more powerful. She is clearly urban. Qashqai rolls in corners and "gags" in our pits. Absolutely not critical - almost the same as the previous generation of this crossover. Since such features did not prevent him from being popular, it means, basically, these are nit-picking of those who often change different cars and have the ability to compare. The ground clearance of 185 mm also speaks of the city registration of the Nissan Qashqai. Although there are enough of them in the city.

Driving joy
In a nutshell: you drive a Nissan Qashqai, and a Mazda CX-5 you light it up. Nissan is more suited for a calm, relaxed ride. Mazda is for a groovy drive, although it is relaxed to drive a quarter of the gas pedal, no one forbids it either.

In the city hustle and bustle Mazda CX-5 - very decent, understandable and sharp steering, even in spite of the large 19-inch wheels. The steering speed of the diesel CX-5 is 2 and ½, so the crossover is easy to obey the steering wheel. The sharpness of the control allows you to maneuver quite extreme in narrow places, but thanks to good visibility from the driver's seat, such maneuvers go through tightly without heart sinking. In the corners, the crossover gives, of course, a roll - the ground clearance of 210 mm is not going anywhere. But the roll is confident, not terrible even for the mother-in-law. Without a hint that the Mazda CX-5 is about to tip over or start sliding off the road. The diesel engine is heavier than the gasoline engine, and the diesel CX-5 weighs almost 200 kg more. But this does not impair the crossover's handling. On the contrary, it seems that the car is more confident on the road.

And the acceleration dynamics of 9.4 s to a hundred can not be called weak. Mazda CX-5 rides fervently. Overtaking is not a problem, especially in the manual gearshift mode, which is available on the 6-speed automatic. He, by the way, does not "dull" - switch from gear to gear on time and does not force the driver to adapt himself - to make a reserve of time for the acceleration to start with some delay. At the same time, I would like to note the correct operation of the i-stop system, which turns off the engine at traffic lights and saves fuel.

In terms of driving dynamics, the Nissan Qashqai is neither a leader nor an outsider. It is slower than Mazda, but 11.1s to 100s is a normal result. In sports mode, the car rides, of course, livelier. More precisely - sharper, which creates the illusion of additional dynamics. But hardly faster. The variator responds faster. But in the "eco" mode it sometimes seems that the spring in the gas pedal has broken. So limp and almost without resisting, she falls through the first third. The controllability is clear and not bad. 3 and ¼ turns of the steering wheel from lock to lock is not a sports indicator, but quite acceptable for the average motorist. The power of the Nissan Qashqai engine is enough, the dynamics are normal, the variator works almost without delays, there is a sport mode and the ability to manually shift gears.

Who's better?
So what do we have for the $ 4,000 difference? The CX-5 has four-wheel drive, a more spacious interior, a more powerful engine, better dynamics and off-road qualities. All of the above is definitely worth such a price difference.

Both diesel engines proved to be quite economical in urban conditions. Not the same, of course, as in those characteristics of the manufacturer, but still. In Mazda СХ-5 Average diesel consumption is 7.6 l / 100 km. Nissan Qashqai has 7.5 l / 100 km.

The Nissan Qashqai is a balanced average car that should and should please the average buyer. Mazda CX-5 - more sub-drive. Moreover, for additional drive and four-wheel drive, you do not have to pay with higher fuel consumption.

The answer to the seemingly specific question "who is better?" leads many into the jungle of virtual thinking. And even philosophizing. Why? Because the Mazda CX-5 could be better from a driver's point of view. Passengers will like Nissan Qashqai more. Objectively, the Mazda CX-5 has a more powerful engine, better dynamics, four-wheel drive. And diesel consumption is practically the same as that of Qashqai. But subjectively (and this is how a car is most often chosen - I want it all), it is difficult to say who a potential buyer will choose. More precisely, he will prefer it. Perhaps detailed tests of each model, which were published by our source, will help with this.

We would like to thank the Auto-International and Nissan Motor Ukraine companies for their help in organizing the test.

The Nissan Qashqai crossover has established itself as a fairly budget option, if this definition is suitable for cars with a price of more than a million rubles. But does this economy pay off? To answer this question, let's try to compare CX 5

Off-road

Nissan Qashqai vs Mazda CX 5 - which is better? Everything is relative! Many people know that Qashqai shares a common base with Nissan hatchbacks, so they believe that the car has only the shape of an SUV, but will drown in the first puddle. Is it so?

Indeed, the most powerful engine of the Kashkaev line is a two-liter gasoline engine with an output power of 144 hp. Very modest against the background of 150 hp, which is produced by a Mazda engine of the same volume. But the torque at the power plant of Kashkai is not so bad 200 N * m, but sometimes it is the torque that is decisive when storming off-road.

But torque is not the only way Qashqai makes up for the lack of power. Its main feature is the 4 × 4-i all-wheel drive system, to which Nissan mechanics paid special attention. The driver has three driving modes:

1. 2WD - as you might guess, only two wheels (front) will be leading in this mode, regardless of driving conditions;
2. Auto - the on-board computer decides for itself when to use four-wheel drive. By default, the car remains front-wheel drive, the automation connects the rear axle when entering a turn, slipping, the danger of skidding. Analogue of the mode.
3. Lock - the car turns into a full 4x. At the same time, smart automation will itself distribute the torque between the wheels, depending on the grip. At a speed of 80 km / h or more, the system automatically switches from Lock to Auto.

And what will Mazda vs Qashqai answer? According to Mazda designers, the driver's business is to enjoy high-speed driving without being distracted by the transmission. The only default operating mode of the rear-wheel drive is the analogue of Nissan's Auto. Forced blocking is available as an option.

The Mazdovites clearly focused on power and speed: the 2.5-liter gasoline unit produces 196 hp with a torque of 256 N * m. Obviously better than Nissan. Excellent performance on the highway does not show itself to the proper extent in the mud - the automatic machine constantly tries to raise the revs, causing offensive slippage.

Despite the very good ground clearance for a crossover (210mm), Mazda strives to scoop up the dirt with its outstanding radiator grill. The ground clearance of Nissan Qashqai is 190 mm, but on Russian-assembled cars it has been far-sightedly increased to 200 - the peculiarities of the place of operation are taken into account. True, it is easy to leave a mud-protecting bumper apron on a particularly unfortunate bump.

If we compare the radiator grill, in general, Mazda is well protected from dirt. Massive thresholds almost completely cover the doors and sides of the car from dirt and splashes. The rear door is protected from splashes by a matte wide bumper cover.

In the city and on the highway

Despite the wide "jeep" CX 5 is perfectly controlled, instantly obeys the steering wheel and easily enters the turn. Precision control allows you to make rather risky maneuvers, which is also facilitated by excellent visibility, opening from the driver's seat.

The very good (in its class) dynamics of Mazda also contributes to overtaking maneuvers - the car "jumps" a hundred from a place in 9.4 seconds, as well as the SPORT mode in which the engine "squeezes out" higher revs.

In a corner, the ground clearance also makes itself felt - the roll on bends is quite sensitive. Not enough to expect a coup, but it still takes some getting used to.

Well, if you didn't manage to bypass the traffic jam, despite everything, the i-STOP system will help you avoid unnecessary fuel consumption by turning off the engine during a long stop.

The Nissan Qashqai is clearly not built to break speed records. The dynamics of acceleration to hundreds is a very modest 11.1 s. The steering wheel is free, the number of revolutions from edge to edge is three and a quarter, a relatively good indicator of a city car without claims to be sporty.

Sports mode - yes. And this is the only thing that can be said about it, as well as about the "eco" mode. But the variator behaves perfectly, precisely keeping the desired speed. If desired, you can switch to manual mode.

Exterior and interior

Appearance is a matter of taste. If the Mazda CX-5, even taking into account the extreme restyling of 2015, has already managed to "blur" the eye, then the Qashqai 2016 is quite fresh and attracts attention. But it is clear that this is a temporary phenomenon, especially since the Mazdovites are not asleep - a new version of the CX-5 appearance is on the way.

If you look at objective data, the picture is as follows:

Although Nissan is wider, this place "eats up" the transmission tunnel, so there is more space in the Mazda cabin. And the luggage compartment is larger - 443 liters against exactly 400 at Kashkai.

Both the compared cars - Nissan Qashqai and Mazda CX 5 - are equally relevant to the vehicle class and the award of victory in this category depends entirely on specific tastes.

As for the hardware content, Mazda stands out for its excellent parking sensors, which pleasantly surprises with the accuracy of its work. This is especially important considering that the car is one of the longest in its class.

But Qashqai takes its toll with the system of all-round visibility and control of "dead zones". A light bulb in the passenger compartment on the right or on the left will draw the driver's attention to the fact that someone "got used" from the corresponding side. We will never know how many motorcyclists owe their lives to such a useful device.

In the cabin of the top-end Nissan Qashqai, the first thing that attracts attention is the panoramic glass roof.

What is the price of the issue? The "default" Mazda CX 5 with a two-liter engine costs about 1,300,000 rubles, the Russian-assembled Nissan Qashqai is 200,000 cheaper. Whether it is worth supporting a domestic manufacturer, albeit under the auspices of a Japanese brand, is up to you.

1869 views

When a desire to purchase a crossover arises, almost every motorist is faced with a choice between the two most popular cars: Mazda CX-5 and Nissan Qashqai. These models are the leaders in the automotive market. To compare the Mazda SH5 and Nissan Qashqai, you need to learn in detail about each of them: advantages, similarities and fundamental differences.

Appearance of cars

What a car looks like is important for everyone. During a walk, attention is first drawn to the appearance of the car, and then to the brand. Therefore, it is worth finding out which is better - Nissan Qashqai or Mazda CX5 - according to external parameters.

Externally, the 2016 Nissan Qashqai and the Mazda CX 5 are similar. The design of one and the other speaks of power. In the case of Nissan, the opinion is deceiving. It looks elegant and Mazda is assertive. The effect is achieved thanks to a massive ventilation grill in the front of the car and a straight line above the door handles.

The exterior of the Mazda CX-5 embodies the manufacturer's concept called KODO (translated as "driving soul").
In the matter of the exterior, one cannot say for sure which is better - Mazda or Nissan. If you like the classic style of the car, give preference to the Nissan Qashqai. If you want to have a sportier car, choose the CX-5.

Characteristic

• both diesel cars with automatic gearbox;
• fuel consumption is the same, approximately 7.5 l / 100 km;
• engine displacement 1997 cc;
• in all other parameters, Mazda CX-5 wins;
• the power of Mazda cx5 is 150 hp, the Qashqai has 144 hp;
• acceleration time - 8.9 s, for Qashqai - a whole second longer (9.9 s);
• clearance for Mazda is 215 mm, for Nissan is 190 mm;
• CX-5 is all-wheel drive, while Kashkaya has front-wheel drive;
• The advantages of Nissan include the volume of the trunk (430 liters). The SH-5 has 403 hp. But the Mazda CX-5 has a more spacious cabin.

It is safe to say that Mazda is more powerful and better. Power is given by a greater number of cylinders (there are 4 of them, Nissan Qashqai has 2). Thanks to them, the jeep accelerates to 200 km / h, which is the maximum speed for this model. For Nissan, this figure is 170 km / h.

A feature of Qashqai is the bulbs near the front mirrors that light up if the car is overtaken, as well as a panoramic glass roof. What makes Mazda stand out is the fuel-saving i-stop system. It is useful, for example, while waiting for a green traffic light.

In terms of safety, both cars deserve top praise. They have more than 6 airbags, ABS, emergency braking system Brake Assist, ESP stability control, UAS hill start assist, ASR traction control and much more.

Considering the listed characteristics, it is worth noting that both models have a number of advantages. When choosing CX5 or Qashqai, you need to decide for what specific purpose the crossover is needed. Mazda CX-5 is suitable for off-road driving enthusiasts. The Nissan Qashqai is designed for quiet city driving on well-paved roads.

Which car to give preference to

The price difference between the two crossovers is $ 2,000. Mazda СX-5 is more expensive. If we compare both cars, then Mazda clearly shows the advantage over Nissan. She:

• more spacious;
• more powerful;
• has good dynamics;
• intended for city driving;
• suitable for off-road racing.

Considering these parameters, the question “what to buy - Nissan Qashqai or Mazda CX-5” does not arise.