Two legendary cars that can rightfully be called the best in their class. Like twin brothers, these “mastodons” have been fighting for the right to leadership in the consumer market for more than 30 years. The history of the appearance of both cars goes back to the distant 80s of the last century, directly to the land of the rising sun. It is from there, from the region where typhoons and earthquakes rage, that the SUVs that the whole world knows about come from.
Both cars are already in their fourth generation, and during the entire production period several restylings and improvements have been made. Quality and reliability are one of the main components on which manufacturers place the main emphasis, and the designs of both cars would hardly be called “super complex.”
Montero, Shogun and Pajero, one car with different names
As for the Mitsubishi Pajero 4, the SUV takes its roots from the third (previous) generation. Moreover, many auto experts and critics confidently declare that the car of the previous series has simply undergone a more in-depth modification. Indeed, the changes in the appearance, interior and technical part of the car were not so significant. With the naked eye or from afar, you may not even notice the differences, besides, many components, assemblies and parts of the machines are interchangeable.
But nevertheless, the automaker radically changed the following:
1. The front and rear parts of the body have been found the new kind, the shapes of the bumpers and optics have also changed.
2. Turbodiesel engine 4M41, used on the three-ruble car, received a new Common Rail injection system. Due to this, it was possible to increase power from 165 to 200 hp, and torque from 351 to 441 Nm.
As for gasoline engines, two engines remained from the Pajero 3, 6G72 and 6G75. True, the latter has undergone some changes, in particular, a new MIVEC variable valve timing system has been applied (our own development Mitsubishi Motors), resulting in an increase in power of 19 hp.
3. There were also changes to the chassis and suspension. Wheel bearings (the weak point of the predecessor), so the designs were modified and the service life increased. The suspension arms are made of aluminum and are smaller in size. The springs have become longer and thicker, the ground clearance has not changed, but the rigidity has increased. The fourth generation handles much better on a good road; roll and roll in corners are a thing of the past.
4. The door cards remained the same shape, only the finishing materials changed. In the interior, by and large, there was a slight update and nothing more. So, for example, the seats remained absolutely identical to their counterparts, and the headrests became without holes. In general, the interior space, with the exception of the center console and panel, remains unchanged.
Now let's take a closer look at our opponent
The 120 series was replaced in 2009 by the generation 150 body (4th in a row) Toyota Land Cruiser Prado. The car is built on the same chassis as the earlier variation. The supporting frame has undergone a slight change, which has been strengthened in the spar part. It is worth noting that the closest relatives of the Prado are also considered to be the FJ Cruiser, 4Runner and Land Cruiser 200, the components and parts of which are largely identical. The power plants used on the fourth Pradika are, for the most part, the same as those on the predecessor.
The very name of the SUV family Land Cruiser-translated from in English, means land cruiser. And the name Prado translated from Spanish as meadow.
Used engines and their weak points
1. Atmospheric petrol engine 2TR-FE, previously also installed on the 120 series. Previously, cars with this engine were not supplied to European countries, and cars with such an engine, as a rule, indicated that this was an export option for the countries of the Middle East, or as in common people call him "Arab".
With the advent of the 4th generation of SUVs, this motor again found a second life, but now also on the European continent. In the line of all power units, this engine is considered the weakest, and its power reaches only 163 hp, with a torque of 246 Nm, which does not produce extremely high performance when driving.
The engine itself is not young, but comes from the same Toyota 3FZ-FE engine, once installed on the “one hundred and twentieth”. The cylinder head was modified and a new variable valve timing system was installed, thereby increasing the power from 150 to 163 hp, and the timing drive, in the form of a chain, was modernized and made more reliable. By and large, this engine time-tested and proven"to the point." All ailments have been cured over the years. The only pity is that the car operates at the limit of its capabilities, which cannot have any positive effect on its service life.
2. Diesel turbocharged 1KD-FTV, in-line four-cylinder engine with 16 valves, a displacement of 3 liters and an output of 173 l/s. Just like the previous unit, it migrated from the Land Cruiser Prado, only in the second generation. The motor first appeared in 2000 and already then it was installed fuel system battery type Common Rail, which was an innovation of that time. Over the entire period of its production, engineers carried out a number of activities to refine and improve the reliability of the engine, but still some The disadvantages are still relevant today:
The belt drive of a diesel engine, and even with a high compression ratio, is not the most ordinary solution. Meanwhile, the manufacturer in the instructions recommends replacing it once every 120 thousand kilometers, which is disproportionately large even for gasoline engines. To avoid timing belt breakage, it is recommended to replace the entire set at an earlier date.
Fuel injectors are very sensitive to fuel quality. As practice shows, their average resource is 120-150 thousand km, and in cases of using bad diesel fuel, even less. Surprisingly for many, there are 4 such injectors in the engine, cost of each approximately around 25 thousand rubles.
3. The top-end naturally aspirated petrol 1GR-FE, with a displacement of 4 liters, producing 282 horsepower and a torque of 387 N.M. Once upon a time, the same engine was installed on the Prado 120, only with less power(249 hp). Improvements were made to the gas distribution mechanism, namely, a completely new phase change system appeared, somewhat similar to a clutch, instead of the traditional gear pulley on the camshaft. The valve drive remains unchanged. As before, it is subject to manual adjustment every 250-300 thousand km.
The engine block is made of aluminum alloy, and the cooling system has jackets even between the cylinders, thereby preventing zone overheating of parts. This engine can confidently be called flagship in the line of power units, and the mileage done without major repairs often exceeds the mark at 650-700 thousand. Owners of SUVs with such an engine have not identified any major weak points. The reputation of the leader can only be spoiled by the high transport tax, calculated on the power of the unit.
What is better than Mitsubishi Pajero and Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Over many years of production, both SUVs have gained a whole army of fans and haters. Each in his own way is a standard among idols. By examining various criteria and factors, we will try to determine the pros and cons of each car, and in the meantime, everyone will think about the conclusions to themselves.
Body, appearance, dimensions
It's no secret that Mitsubishi Pajero 4, practically 80% body inherited from its predecessor. The frame, as before, remained integrated into the body, the doors and fenders are absolutely identical, the trunk lid (or the 5th door) differs only in the niches for the spare tire. In general, the appearance has not changed dramatically, but there is still something new.
For the Toyota LC 150, the situation is completely different. The car's body has changed beyond recognition, and its dimensions have actually grown to the size of its older brother LC 100 in the previous generation. The latest fashion trends, angular body lines and IH-shaped slanted shapes are visible on the face.
If the Prado's predecessor, with its rounded and smooth features, was more like a typical American SUVs , then today's SUV is not at all like it. Notes appeared in the design, clearly of Japanese flavor, somewhat reminiscent of the auto industry from early 90s. Apparently, as the proverb says, everything new is well forgotten old, nevertheless the car was a success and turned out to be quite brutal.
New body generation, of course, is not always beneficial, and sometimes you just need to do a light facelift. But in the case of the Land Cruiser, the situation is completely different; in appearance, it is clearly superior to the Mitsubishi, which has lost its charm in almost 20 years.
As for the sizes, here there is some catch. The official length of the Pajero is 4900 cm, versus 4780 cm for the Prado. Here, many car enthusiasts will immediately be outraged by such indicators, because to the eye, the situation is inversely proportional. The thing is that the length of the body is measured along all the protruding parts in front and behind the car, and Mitsubishi has an external spare wheel, which adds about 25 centimeters.
In terms of width, the “pradik” surprisingly loses 1.5 cm to its opponent, and in terms of height, it gains the same one and a half centimeters in its favor. “Somewhere it has decreased, somewhere it has increased.”
Chassis, suspension, transmission
The TLC 150 design uses a classic machine layout off-road. A solid axle is used in the rear, and a multi-link with CV joints in the front.
Regarding the “Padzherik”, in simple words, all the components are more like a “SUV”. There are no bridges, and the entire suspension is completely independent, and even on aluminum levers. Such Mitsubishi design will clearly win compared to its opponent, in stability on an asphalt road, especially at high speeds, but for off-road use, this is its obvious disadvantage.
Ride in a "land cruiser" along the highway, on high speed It's not comfortable, it sways and rolls a lot when cornering. But comfort and softness, with leisurely movement, are its strong point, which can confidently be called an advantage over its counterpart.
All-wheel drive on the Land Cruiser family is permanently connected, in a ratio of 60:40, it is also possible forced blocking central differential. Mitsubishi uses Advanced transmission Super Select II 4WD, which distributes torque using clutches and an electric drive.
There are much more possibilities here than the competitor, including a single-wheel drive mode and switching the wheel arrangement at speed. There is no doubt about the reliability of both units; the only reason for thought is that the Mitsubishi gearbox is equipped with a number of sensors and electronics that can put the transmission into emergency mode in the event of a malfunction.
Comparison of power plants and selection of the best
If we draw an analogy with engines, it turns out that the number of main units of the compared cars is the same, 2 gasoline and 1 turbodiesel. There are also export options with other engines; it makes no sense to consider them, since they are extremely rare.
On both SUVs, in the lineup power plants, no place for beginners. All motors used have a decent “experience” and proven over more than a decade. Most of the problems that arise during their operation can with great confidence be attributed to systemic ones. So, for example, the timing chain used on a top-end Toyota engine 1GR-FE lasts for 250-350 thousand km without any problems, and the normal life of the turbine in the 4M41 Pajero engine is almost 200-250 thousand km. Such high performance, many middle-class cars are far from capable.
Interior space
The archaic Padzherik's interior is noticeably tighter than its rival, but surprisingly, the all-round visibility is still better. Big and bold minus in the Mitsubishi showroom, considered to be very close driver's seat and the steering column to the door. Even a person who is not of large build will rest his left foot on the door. Apparently the calculation was for short and thin Japanese.
The finishing materials for the interior panels and seats are significantly higher than in the Prado. Sound insulation is definitely better in the Toyota Land Cruiser j150, but crickets in the hard plastic panels appear more often in the Prado.
Finally, some pros and cons
The luxury version of Pajero 4 will cost about 500 rubles. cheaper than a competitor, and themselves Mitsubishi configurations look much richer.
In the secondary market, these SUVs are found with low mileage in approximately 80% of cases. In order not to be deceived, you can read the special instructions.
Export cars for the countries of the Middle East and the UAE are found in both brands. Buying such a car will most likely not be best investment money. The lack of insulation in the sheathing, poor resistance to moisture and frost, these are the minimum differences from European analogues.
The cost of spare parts and maintenance for SUVs is virtually the same. The only “but” in this matter is that Mitsubishi only fits spare parts from the previous version, which can be found cheaper or used.
These magnificent “Japanese” have long won a leading position in the market large SUVs. Powerful and economical, cars of the two lines have been secretly competing since the 80s.
We will compare Mitsubishi Pajero and Toyota Prado according to the most important parameters for those who are planning to buy a full-size car for city driving and long trips.
Multiple cross-country rally winner has long been considered a flagship model range Japanese auto giant. The Legend concept was first presented on the market in a three-door version with turbocharged petrol ( 2 l.) and diesel ( 2.3 l.) engines in 1982.
Cars of the fourth generation Pajero have excellent technical characteristics. However, the design of the crossover has not undergone significant changes: classic, slightly angular shapes, strict body lines create a feeling of reliability and massiveness of the structure.
The history of Prado began in 1984. The first generation was represented by three- and five-door models. SUVs were equipped with gasoline engines 2.4 And 2.7 l. and diesels on 2,4 , 2.8 And 3 l.
The third generation Prado (Lexus GX) received a number of significant changes in the design of the exterior and interior. Depending on the modification, the cars came with a 5-speed manual and 4-speed automatic. The cars are equipped with independent front suspension.
Modifications for European market have a Torsen central differential, which allows you to distribute power and load between the front and rear axles rear wheels in a 40/60 ratio. “Arabs” received additional options - a 7-seater cabin with seat upholstery in natural leather instead of velor, a camera and lighting.
The modernized fourth generation models are today considered one of the best SUVs in your class.
What do Mitsubishi Pajero and Toyota Prado have in common?
The lineup of these two SUV families combines reliability and unsurpassed quality Japanese assembly, as well as a number technical innovations, many of which were introduced into mass production for the first time.
There are definitely similarities in general concept and the ideas that guided brand engineers. Models of both lines combine reliability and high cross-country ability SUV with ease of control and comfort for the driver and passengers. A big plus of SUVs is the ability to easily fold the seats into a “flat floor” to organize a sleeping area.
Comparison and how they differ
The undoubted advantages of the Pajero line are excellent cross-country ability and amazing spaciousness. The air suspension will help you drive on snowy tracks or uneven roads. However, the 4-liter Prado has more engine life. This super-powerful SUV performs better when overtaking and starting from a standstill.
Passability and maneuverability
Pajero ground clearance is 225-235 mm against 220 mm Prado has a plus, although small.
“Pradik” easily climbs steep climbs and drives through “big water” up to 70 cm deep. But there is one nuance - it takes sharp turns worse and here the driver needs to be careful. For better cross-country ability, the center differentials can be locked.
The biggest complaints from Prado SUV drivers are the braking system and ABS. On icy and snowy road The car brakes a little worse and coasts a little.
Security and Manageability
Various modifications of the Prado received a number of innovations and unique design solutions. In particular, the HAC and DAC systems for assistance when climbing uphill and downhill, thanks to which the machine easily starts uphill slippery surface. For even greater control and increased safety on slippery road VSC and traction control are used.
Prado owners note the “soft steering” and excellent ride quality, which is very noticeable on uneven roads. This ride is as comfortable as possible for the driver, but back side medals - “buildup”. Due to the dependent soft suspension and comfortable handling, it is very easy to accelerate. The SUV can deviate from the trajectory quite sharply compared to the Pajero. This is where the motion stabilization system comes to the rescue.
Prices
Seven-seater used SUV Pajero ( 3.8 l.) much cheaper - about 900 thousand rubles. compared to the 4-liter five-seater Prado, which costs from 1.3 million rubles. and higher.
Operation and Maintenance
Both lines are distinguished by unpretentious operation and wide availability of any spare parts. However, in general, the Prado will cost less to maintain.
The brutally handsome Pajero, as expected, turned out to be more voracious: on average, consumption on the highway was 13.2 l/100 km versus 12.4 l/100 km for the Prado. As for the latter, the fuel consumption of the 4-liter SUV is almost the same as that of the configuration with a 2.7-liter engine.
conclusions
Each of these SUVs is good in its own way. Both lines boast excellent cross-country ability, maneuverability and controllability. However, Pajero is more attractive in terms of the combination of price and quality.
If you are not a fan of racing and are looking for a universal car for city driving, long trips, hunting and outdoor excursions, the Prado will suit you. It rides great on snow, gravel, steep descents and uneven road.
In choosing a model, of course, everything depends on the tastes and wallet of the car enthusiast. Prado "Arabs" meet all the requirements in terms of comfort for drivers and passengers.
Gasoline engines cause a little less trouble, or rather, they do not react so sharply to sport style ride. For gasoline engines, it is important not to “oversleep” the engine temperature. Overheating for a V-shaped “six” always ends with replacing the cylinder head, or even two. A “used” head will not help for obvious reasons: where is the guarantee that it was not removed from the same car? Again, it all depends on the owner. An experienced Pajerist will replace the antifreeze in a timely manner, monitor its level, and if it stalls, he will not just press the gas, but look at the engine temperature sensor. Overheating costs at least $1000. For what? Diesel engines high temperatures more loyal. Just sand the head ($150) and you can move on with your life.
By the age of 300,000 km everything gasoline engines suffer from problems with the gas distribution mechanism. Noise and knocking mean replacing camshafts or repairing the cylinder head. For everything about everything - about $1000. Around the same mileage, oil “incontinence” on the gaskets begins valve cover and pallet.
All of the above does not mean that Mitsubishi engines- absolute hell compared to Toyota units. They are simply much more demanding in terms of operating conditions and compliance with maintenance deadlines. Where a Toyota engine groans and groans and endures, Mitsubishi will not tolerate it, but will immediately punish you with money.
In our conditions, it is better to reduce the service intervals for all engines to 10,000 km, without skimping on filters. Especially air: a clogged filter can easily “pull” the catalyst along with it.
The timing belt ($80) is changed every 90,000 km: it is better to spend money on rollers and seals along with it, so as not to pay twice due to stinginess. The 2.8-liter turbodiesel has a timing chain ($150), but it is advisable to change it at 300,000 km.
The Super Select 4WD transmission, which is used on the Pajero, beats the Toyota one in terms of drive options. You can drive in rear-wheel drive mode, saving fuel. Can be enabled front axle. And on slippery sections of the road, lock the center differential, and on even slipperier ones, engage a downshift. All this with a clear indication on the instrument panel and one lever! The words "intuitive" are a great way to describe the Pajero's powertrain. Most cars have a lock rear differential, the designers considered “clamping” the front one to be self-indulgent.
The most "popular" transmission malfunction is input shaft ($160) manual box transmission He honestly warns about a possible breakdown with increased noise, then a howl, and then the Pajero simply stops. This breakdown is typical for heavy five-door versions; it almost never occurs in “three-door” versions.
The weak diesel engine excels here too: the clutch ($360) rarely lasts longer than 60-80,000 km.
Most often, Pajero's rear crosspieces fall off ($120) cardan shaft. The front ones ($90) last a little longer, but are also a popular spare part. There is no point in talking about service life: it depends only on how sharply and how hard you press the gas pedal.
Servicemen rarely encounter problems with the transfer case. And when they collide, they give it to the owners good advice: “Don’t look for spare parts, but buy a used box. It will cost less than repairs and will last just as long.” Service station technicians usually help you find a “not tired transfer case.”
Don't assume that all transmission problems are caused by too much driving. Light asphalt life damages the rear differential locking mechanism. The vacuum drive tubes become clogged or the contacts become sour, or less often, the drive pump itself breaks down ($450).
There are no problems with Mitsubishi automatic transmissions. There is a problem with the power of the 3.5-liter engine, which “kills” the transmission in the region of 100-150,000 km. Jerks when shifting gears will tell you that death is approaching. The recipe for “poison” for an automatic transmission looks like this: driving fast and exceeding oil change intervals. It needs to be changed every 45,000 km and always with a filter ($50). And use only branded Mitsubishi oil($100), the “automatic machine” simply does not perceive others.
Cat's cradle
The suspensions of both cars are soft and gentle on passengers. Toyota suspension also takes care of the owner's wallet. And to the ears too. Even broken anti-roll bar bushings ($10 apiece) are “silent”, not revealing themselves in any way. They are changed every 30,000 km, and silent blocks ($25 apiece) “live” about 60-70,000 km. At approximately 150,000 km, the front shock absorbers will need to be replaced ($70 apiece).
There's nothing particularly special about the rear suspension other than the shock absorbers ($45 each). In five-door cars they last for about 50-60,000 km, and by 100-150,000 km the longitudinal rods and silent blocks will need to be changed.
It will take a little more money to maintain the Pajero chassis. And much more - to replace shock absorbers with variable stiffness. They are installed on expensive versions and cost about $250 per shock absorber. Replacement cannot be put off for a long time, because along with the shock absorbers, you will also buy a system pump. It costs about $700. One can only be consoled by the fact that unpleasant situation you can get out by installing conventional shock absorbers.
The front suspension requires intervention every 80-90,000 km. After replacing the ball joints and steering ends, the car drives for the same amount of time, then the silent blocks will need to be replaced. They are replaced as an assembly with a lever ($190), and Taiwanese silent blocks ($20 apiece) turn the suspension into a “find and change what’s knocking” attraction.
There isn't much to break at the back either. The only effect is towing heavy trailers: silent blocks fail. They, paired with worn shock absorbers, will tell you that this is a “deserved tractor”. The steering settings are the same as the suspension. American-style powerful hydraulic boosters help off-road, but are not at all conducive to fast driving on asphalt.
Toyota steering problems have costly problems. The steering shaft crosspiece - $200, the rubber bands that attach the steering to the body are supplied only complete with the steering mechanism - $1600. Fluid leaks are also not uncommon, but they are much cheaper. Steering rods ($140 apiece) do not like swimming in water and mud, and jeepers write them down as Consumables. Regular drivers they drive without even knowing this line in the price lists of spare parts stores.
Mitsubishi Pajero requires replacement of four steering tips ($40 apiece) every 80-90,000 km, and by 300-350,000 km - the pendulum and bipod ($250 for both parts) of the steering mechanism.
With the brakes, everything is very similar for both cars: the front brake pads ($100 Toyota, $60 Mitsubishi) “last” 30-40,000 km, the rear ones up to 60-70,000 km ($75 Toyota, $50 Mitsubishi). It doesn't hurt to clean them every time you replace them. seats and lubricate the guide supports. Otherwise, they will jam and wear unevenly. For calm drivers brake discs($225 Toyota, $170 Mitsubishi) can withstand more than 100,000 km.
Troubles are possible with the ABS, or, to be precise, with its sensors. A faulty ABS is a sign of a car's "Jeeper" past, so such cars need to be carefully inspected.
Old Pajero's master cylinder leaks. The original repair kit costs $80, but the service life of the repaired unit is limited to two years. New branded cylinder - $200.
We turn off the engine
That's it, our study tour weak points Toyota Land Cruiser Prado and Mitsubishi Pajero have ended. If it seemed too long to someone, all-wheel drive vehicles have a lot of parts. And most owners take their cars too lightly. If Toyota is relatively calm about barbaric operation, then Mitsubishi Pajero reacts instantly. The very first visit to the service convinces all new owners of this. Therefore, Prado wins among these “Japanese”. It is more reliable and cheaper to operate. But that doesn't mean the Pajero is bad. Firstly, prices for Mitsubishi are lower, especially for Monteros imported from America. Secondly, the Pajero's interior is perhaps more comfortable.
Both cars are last representatives sort of classic SUVs. Minimum electronics, maximum well-thought-out mechanics. There are few alternatives to them among new cars. And it is possible that having “tried” Pajero or Prado, you will want to leave it for ten years.
Happy shopping!
* - Prices are indicated for branded parts, the cost of replacement is in branded service centers at the time of writing. However, they may differ slightly in one direction or another.
Eternal rivals - car monsters Toyota and Mitsubishi often confuse future owners, asking them to independently choose the most suitable off-road version. Therefore, the opinion that Pajero 4 or Prado 150 is better is mostly based on the subjective assessment of owners who have experience in operating either one or the other SUV.
Official representatives from both sides are in no hurry to present battle tests, the number of system failures of components and assemblies, returns and modifications of their cars to the general court. They often present dry information in the form of performance characteristics. They pass off wishful thinking, and sometimes they simply briefly describe certain functions of each car, further confusing future owners.
Manufacturers are well aware that being able to operate these two machines at the same time is somewhat strange and even more expensive. That is why most of the value judgments about which is better - Mitsubishi Pajero or Toyota Prado - are based on the opinions of car owners who drive them every day in hot and cold weather, in urban conditions and off-road.
Both cars have a rich history. And they are offered in the fourth generation. Mitsubishi Pajero. It is the number four that worries experts the most, because many are inclined to believe that the latest Pajero is only a decently updated version previous generation.
These suspicions are confirmed by the interior (except for the front panel) and the appearance of the SUV, which is very reminiscent of the second generation models. Power unit 4M41 remains the same and has a volume of 3.2 liters. A new 3.8-liter 6G75 petrol unit has been added. Let us remind you that Pajero has been produced since 2006.
It’s better not to remember about the frame, because there is none. Instead it was installed independent suspension, which is why the car has turned into a family-class SUV with advanced capabilities all-wheel drive transmission. It is possible to position Pajero as an extreme SUV, but very carefully.
Passengers and chassis elements suffer the most from this design, especially when driving over rough terrain. In this case, the moving parts of the body are subjected to heavy loads and are held by hinges, constantly in contact with the door seals. Over time, such contact leads to rubbing of the rubber and contact directly with the metal parts of the structure.
Particularly inconvenient is the mediocre sound insulation. In case of additional treatment with anti-creak, the issue is resolved only by 50%.
How are Prado doing? Land Cruiser Prado 150 came out a little later - in 2009, but, like the third generation, it is built on the same wheelbase as its predecessor 120, which means it has a frame structure. According to company representatives, this will apparently be the last modification to have a frame base.
The dimensions of the body have undergone changes, it has become larger. Permanent all-wheel drive was inherited from its predecessor (there is nothing wrong with that). Last generation acquired additional option KDSS (it was not present in the 3rd generation), the brand name remained unchanged air suspension Land Cruiser.
Patency
One of the main criteria when choosing is cross-country ability. Both cars were originally designed to comfortably overcome obstacles. You can only compare Toyota Prado and Mitsubishi Pajero if you operate them under the same conditions.
IN last car The transmission is more responsive, primarily due to well-made factory settings. Electronics that provide braking for wheels in the air guarantee excellent interaction of the remaining wheels with loose soil and mud layers.
Therefore, climbing a mountain in a Pajero or Prado is a big difference. Toyota is clearly losing, constantly slipping. When you press the accelerator pedal at the top of the climb, there is a long pause and only then the wheels begin to slow down. Often this is enough to lose momentum and load.
In both cars the transmission is in the same position - turned on low gear with active blocking center differential. The presence of a cross-axle differential in Toyota and Pajero budget options not provided. Depending on the configuration, the ground clearance for both cars is not the same, 220 and 235 mm, respectively. With the installation of protection it can change downwards by 10-15 mm.
It should be noted that the Prado’s suspension is much more comfortable, especially when overcoming rough areas.
Interior
In the maximum Ultimate configuration, the Pajero IV cannot fail to please enough big size sunroof (Prado doesn’t have one), leather interior. The front seats are mechanically adjustable. The steering wheel is not adjustable for reach.
Land Cruiser Prado 150 in the middle Elegance configuration steering wheel It is adjustable in both height and reach, which is very convenient if used by several drivers. The engine starts with a button and has keyless access.
Taking advantage electrically driven, you can set the front seats to a comfortable position, although the manufacturers did not provide a memory function. All this can be found in the Prestige package, and in addition, there is navigation, a cross-axle differential lock, and 4 cameras located around the perimeter. All this is reflected in the price (400 thousand more).
The front panel on the Pajero looks a little more sophisticated than the Prado. Although the latter has a color monitor, but with a somewhat archaic resolution of 400 by 800. The interior is offered in only three options: ivory, black and brown. The last color was added later. There are no complaints about the quality of finishing and interior materials for both cars.
The Pajero's interior and trunk capacity deserves special attention - it is larger. The car has various niches in the rear under the floor (space under spare wheel), where you can place bulky items. In some car trim levels it is possible to install extra row(the car becomes a 7-seater), which will not be very comfortable, especially when traveling long distances. But the opportunity to stay is still provided.
Musical combines are installed in two cars, even in Pajero High Quality, but the sound leaves much to be desired. There is an excellent option with a color monitor on the ceiling, this makes it possible to watch movies and cartoons. Passengers in the second row will not be bored during long journeys, and the driver will be calmer, since he will not have to be distracted by conversations, especially if children are traveling in the cabin.
Economical
It should be noted that the manufacturer recommends filling AI-92 gasoline in Pajero, and AI-95 in Prado. With the same gasoline units volume 3 liters maximum speed the latter has 10 km less and is 165 km/h.
The cars' consumption per hundred is almost the same and is equal to 10 liters per 100 km on the highway. Therefore, Pajero or Prado, which is better? In this they are practically equal. But in the city it is more profitable to operate the Prado; its consumption is a little over 14 liters, versus 16+ for the Pajero.
Sports version of Pajero
In 1996, Pajero Sport was introduced. Latest version was presented in 2015. It was built on the basis of the Mitsubishi L200. The question of what to prefer - Pajero Sport or Prado is ambiguous.
After all, in fact, Toyota remains softer in relation to even the fourth generation Pajero, so you shouldn’t count on comfort in the sport version. The SUV has acquired a completely new Off-Road mode, operating in four options – “gravel”, “snow/mud”, “sand”, “stone”. Therefore, obstacles will be overcome much easier and safer.
The rigid frame has become even stiffer, and the suspension has been tuned for improved handling, although its design elements remain the same as in the previous generation. Which is better Prado or Pajero Sport? Consider the operating features. If you plan to use the car in an aggressive style, in off-road conditions, then give preference to the sport version. If you drive in the city, lean toward the Prado. No less important factor when purchasing is the cost of SUVs. Mitsubishi price
Pajero Sport is cheaper than Land Cruiser Prado. The famous Pajero and the no less famous Prado - how to do it right choice
? For 30 years, there has been a battle between these “mastodons”, and each owner believes that his car is the best, most unpretentious, . Is it really? Let's compare these two popular cars
and find out which car is worth buying, and which one is better to pass by.
Technical features of the models Mitsubishi Pajero – car, an SUV, the leader of this company’s lineup. The first Pajero went on sale in 1976. Today the 4th generation of the popular car is being produced.
When the fourth generation first appeared on the market, critics of the auto world immediately began to argue about what it was - new model or just complete refurbishment third generation? Externally, the cars are actually very similar.
Prado is also a car from a Japanese manufacturer, and is also now in its 4th generation. We can say that both automakers are going head to head and the dispute has not yet been resolved, which is better - Prado or Pajero?
Both cars have diesel and petrol engines. The body type is identical in both the first and second cases. It is coded as an SUV, which in Russia is often called a “jeep,” or you can call this car a “light truck.”
Both cars have all-wheel drive - 4 driving wheels, which distinguishes them from other counterparts, which are also commonly called “jeeps”.
The differences start with the transmission. Toyota Land Cruiser Prado has automatic transmission 6-speed gears. The enemy is only a mechanical version with five gears.
Engine volume, on the contrary, changes the leader - for Prado it will be 2,754, and for Pajero 2,835 cubic centimeters. But in terms of power, Prado will still be ahead - 177 horses versus 125. Volume fuel tank differs by only 1 liter – 87 and 88 liters.
As for the car's ground clearance, the leader here will be the Mitsubishi Pajero, for which this figure will be equal to 235 mm. For the second car the figure is smaller, although not critical - only 215 cm.
To compare the Mitsubishi Pajero and its most important Toyota competitor Prado, we also need to look at such an indicator as the number of passengers. The second car is designed to carry 5 people, including the driver, while the first can accommodate 9 people including the driver, and everyone will feel like they are in the cabin.
Appearance
The appearance of these cars is a separate issue. Many people decide whether to buy a Prado or Pajero based on this indicator. And indeed, it is important.
Restyling of the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado has made the car look more austere. Its front part stands out in particular. And here the designers really tried. Massive curved radiator grille with black and chrome inserts.
A well-recognized manufacturer's mark is also installed here. And so that the style actually matches the strong character of the owner, the radiator grille also received a border. Due to its appearance, which inspires confidence, the car has become incredibly popular.
If you look at the car from the side, it has practically not changed, and indeed, restyling did not affect it. The rear part of the body has changed, but only slightly. The trunk lid has been enlarged, the brake lights have changed slightly in shape, the space for the license plate has increased both front and rear, the spare wheel has been removed from the trunk door - now it is located inside the car, in a special recess.
The roof can be solid or panoramic with a sunroof. She hasn't changed much. All the changes that have occurred to the car favorably emphasize its strength and power, which means that any trip, even with complete off-road conditions, will be without surprises.
Mitsubishi Pajero is a classic of the genre, and manufacturers have never deviated from this rule. No rough shapes or menacing appearance. Simplicity, brutality and reliability – that’s what comes to mind when you see this car for the first time.
New radiator grille, front bumper modern design and the fashionable shape of the foglights - this is what the car received after the latest restyling. And this is pleasantly surprising.
A flat hood that reminds many of a dining table in a living room, large wheel arches, doors that you don’t have to squeeze through, wide footrests - this is for those who value comfort. And the one who constantly travels completely off-road, will rejoice at the high rear bumper, reliable fastening spare wheel and roof rails.
Therefore, if you do not need to chase fashion, then this car is made especially for you.
Salon and trunk
When they say that Pajero always opposes Prado, there is some truth in these words. Indeed, these two cars literally go head to head, not only in terms of engine power, but also in interior comfort or trunk volume.
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado is leather and natural wood with small elements made to look like aluminum. The center console, although it has a strict classic look, will be understandable even to a novice driver who gets behind the wheel of this car for the first time.
However, even the increased dimensions of the screen did not allow us to get rid of the main disadvantage - a poor image on the screen. Therefore, before making a choice in favor of one car or another, it is better to check everything yourself.
If we talk about the Mitsubishi Pajero, then a person of any size can easily fit here and it will be comfortable for him to sit on back seat. The driver's seat is adjustable in almost any direction, but it can only be adjusted in height, which is a big minus for some.
It is impossible to reach your head to the ceiling, however, as is resting your feet on the front seats. This is exactly what appeals to those who choose this classic version of the car over all others on the market.
Engines and transmissions
Still deciding which car to buy – a classic one Mitsubishi Pajero or menacing on Toyota view Prado? Everything can be decided by the engine performance.
Mitsubishi Pajero can be chosen with both a petrol engine and a diesel engine. A total of three motors with different characteristics are produced.
- Three-liter engine with 178 horses, 24 valves, with a consumption of 12.2 liters per 100 km.
- 3.8-liter engine with 250 horsepower, 24 valves and 13.5 liters per 100 km.
- Diesel with 4 cylinders and 3.2 liters, with 16 valves for 200 horsepower, with a consumption of 8.9 liters per 100 km.
As for the transmission, this car has both automatic and manual transmissions. Everything, again, will depend on what type of motor you prefer to choose.
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado is also presented in three options engines - two gasoline and one diesel, everything is exactly the same as that of its famous competitor.
- Gasoline 4 cylinders, volume 2.7 liters, power 163 horsepower.
- Gasoline with 6 cylinders of 4.0 liters, with a power of 249 horsepower.
- Diesel 4-cylinder with a volume of 2.8 liters and a power of 177 horsepower.
In both the first and second cases, there is plenty to choose from. However, experts advise choosing a diesel engine - fuel consumption will be minimal, which means the costs will not be so high.
Dynamics and fuel consumption
If we compare Toyota Prado and him direct competitor Mitsubishi Pajero Sport or another model, then you need to look at the dynamics and fuel consumption.
Both cars require only high quality gasoline - AI-95 - for proper operation. Concerning diesel fuel, then fill the tank with fuel Low quality no one advises.
Fuel consumption per 100 km. will depend on which engine was chosen by the future owner of the car. Both cars have approximately the same numbers. This is 8.5 - 8.9 liters for a diesel engine, 12.2 liters for a 3-liter engine and 13.5 liters for a larger engine.
Handling and maneuverability
You can compare Pajero and Prado, as well as cross-country ability. Cars do not like strong side winds, so in such weather the driver needs to be especially careful on the road and not accelerate to the maximum possible speed.
If you drive off-road, then you need to do it as slowly as possible, practically without using the brake pedal. And although 4 driving wheels will help you move more or less comfortably around deep snow, and on water, this must be done, guided only by common sense.
Therefore, when comparing cars according to these indicators, both presented options will be excellent assistants for movement both in winter and rainy autumn.
Safety
Mitsubishi Pajero IV generation is sometimes called the most safe car. Indeed, the car can easily overcome a ford up to 70 cm deep, drive up a mountain with a climb angle of 36.6 degrees and can tow a trailer weighing up to 3,300 kg.
The manufacturer calls the main feature a special reinforced body structure, which was not the case before. ABS, EBD, Break Assist, Brake Override System are real protectors of both the driver and the car.
And testing showed that out of 37 possible points, this car scored 28.4.
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado is in no way inferior in safety to its opponent. All modern systems security systems are also installed on this car. Traction control system, ascent/descent assistance system, support constant speed, wonderful cruise control - this is not a complete list of why you should choose this particular car.
Therefore, there are no losers in the Mitsubishi Pajero vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado dispute. Both cars are excellent for complete off-road use.
Price of all configurations
Now it remains to decide main question- price. Let's start with Pajero. Prado will come later. So, for example, the Sport option will cost 2,029,000 rubles.
Basic vehicle equipment (Intense AT) with five-speed gearbox automatic transmission and a 3-liter engine costs 2,302,100 rubles.
A fully equipped car (Ultimate AT) will cost much more – 3,300,000 rubles.
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 150, and this is the most popular option, is presented on the market various configurations. The classic version will cost from 2,249 thousand, but as practice shows, such a car is bought the least often.
Usually they prefer standard for 2,546 thousand or comfort for 2,922 thousand rubles.
There are cars in configurations whose cost has exceeded . These are Elegance for 3,237 thousand and Prestige for 3,589 thousand. And finally, the most expensive and inaccessible option for many is the Safety 2 Suite (7 seats) for 4,064 thousand rubles.
Therefore, in terms of price, it makes no sense to compare Pajero and Prado - you will have to pay more than 2 million for both cars.
Which car should you prefer?
So what to choose - Pajero or Prado? It is impossible to answer this question unequivocally. Both cars have their own strengths and weak sides, both will require a lot of money to refuel, but at the same time they can be driven on any terrain, even where other cars cannot pass. So it's more a matter of personal preference.
