As promised, I “smoked” a little on the Internet about adding 2T oil. I started with foreign forums.

So, the story dates back to approximately 2007, this coincided with the application of new standards for diesel fuel, which reduced the sulfur content until it was completely removed.

Euro-2 since 1996 sulfur content - 0.05%
Euro-3 from 2000 sulfur content - 0.035
Euro-4 since 2005 sulfur content - 0.005
Euro-5 since 2010 sulfur content - 0.001

Petrochemists discovered back in the early 90s that a decrease in sulfur levels affects the deterioration of the lubricating qualities of the fuel, and in 1993 the standard introduced a new requirement: the lubricating property of diesel fuel tested at high frequency piston installation using the method of sliding a metal ball (), maximum allowable wear was fixed at 460 µm. Standard - ISO 12156-1 (and Russian version -).

Axiom one- a decrease in the level of sulfur content worsens the lubricating properties of the fuel, which in turn directly affects wear fuel equipment.

But the progress and work of petrochemists did not stand still, and this natural lubricating agent (sulfur) was replaced with special additives (one option is long chains of carboxylic acids), which were designed to replace the lubricating properties of sulfur.
One of the leading developers of these additives is the German company BASF.

We should also not forget that engine building did not stand still at that time and engines were developed to work with fuel with low sulfur content.

Axiom two - the reduction in sulfur content, which worsens the lubricating properties of the fuel, was replaced by the addition of special lubricating additives.

But everything new is received with hostility, no one believed the chemists, society decided that the new standards were detrimental to diesel equipment, and then some schemer came up with the idea of ​​adding two-stroke oil to the fuel in small proportions to make up for the loss of the miraculous effect of sulfur. Diesel engineers liked the idea so much that it simply blew up the Internet. There was no scientific evidence or testing to support this idea; information was transferred from one car owner to another according to the OBS principle.

It is worth noting that the “benefit” was observed for older mechanical diesels, especially ardently used 2T oil or as they call it 2SO (two stroke oil) by American diesel drivers driving large pickup trucks. Many note reduced noise, cleaner exhaust, and smoother engine operation. All reviews are subjective and rather based on the placebo effect, which is what is noted in reports from car owners.
The proportion of adding 2T oil to fuel is recommended at the level: 1 part 2T oil to 200 parts fuel. Considering the slightly higher density of 2t oil relative to the density of diesel (especially winter) application this method requires good mixing of oil with fuel, which simply cannot be done by simply adding it to the tank.

As for the harm from using 2T oil. There is no definite answer here, since the dose of adding 2T oil is homeopathic and the potential harm from its use is extended over time and ultimately, even if some problems appear, they are attributed to temporary wear and tear of the engine and fuel equipment, but not to add oil.

Users of new diesel engines with electronic injection(in particular Common Rail) look at this “technology” with caution and not many are ready to participate in the experiment for their own money, but the crowd effect has an influence and still some succumb. This also applies to owners particulate filters.

Axiom three - Neither the benefit nor the harm from using 2T oil by adding it to diesel fuel has been scientifically or practically proven.

In conclusion, we managed to find one interesting post that at least substantiates, if not harm, then the uselessness of using 2T oil:

Completely useless not only for diesel engines HDi engines, but also for any engines with Common Rail, event. And that's why:

To begin with, why add oil to diesel fuel at all? The explanation is simple (and well known to anyone diesel specialist(specialists in deeds, not in words)) - “rings”, “rumbles”, “stinks” and a diesel engine with a heavily worn fuel injection pump and other components and parts of fuel equipment operates unevenly - the gaps have increased, the settings are “gone”, painstaking (and expensive) adjustment and/or replacement of worn-out components and parts (also expensive) - and the toad torments, oh, how it torments. ...

And then proven by generations of unscrupulous sellers comes to the rescue. diesel cars reception of mobile phones - two-stroke oil is poured into the fuel. ... The viscosity of the fuel inevitably increases, which means that worn plunger pairs and/or spools/rotors “float up” and stop “ringing”; it is more difficult for a worn injection pump to inject viscous fuel, moreover, most likely through uncleaned injectors, which means the quantity The amount of fuel entering the chambers decreases, as well as the injection start point “shifts” (towards “after” TDC), the fuel begins to burn more slowly... and an illusory effect arises that the engine has begun to run smoother and quieter. Like new... This is the “two-stroke oil scam” - MIRACLE!

But, as you know, miracles, alas, do not happen! And this whole event is countered by the fact that when the diesel engine was new, it also did not “ring” at all, it worked just as quietly, and carried the car forward like a young bun.... on a regular one, without any additives fuel!
So why does it now require topping up oil in order to work (or rather, create the illusion) also quietly and steadily? ... So it is completely logical that the engine is WORN OUT. And this can only be cured by repair.

Don't engage in "garage experiments"! Any professional diesel mechanic will tell you - a normal and serviceable, healthy and well-maintained diesel engine, even with half a million mileage, runs quietly, pulls confidently and “breathes” measuredly on a regular normal diesel engine, WITHOUT adding any miraculous substances to the fuel..

All of the above applies mainly to diesel engines with a “classic” injection system, now extinct, like dinosaurs once...

What about Common Rail?

But for Common Rail, this event is absolutely useless due to the fact that in the direct injection system of diesel engines... there are no gaps (!), or their presence is minimal.

Let's imagine ourselves as a particle of fuel that gets into the fuel tank from refueling nozzle and trace the path of this particle into the combustion chamber of a diesel engine with a Common Rail system...

First, we float in the tank and are sucked in through the interestingly shaped fuel intake nozzle. Its shape is due to the “tea leaves in a glass” effect, whereby, as a result of swirling the fuel flow, large particles of dirt, due to centrifugal force, accumulate to the side of the fuel inlet, or “fly” past it, remaining in the tank. The oil in the fuel is useless at this stage. ...

Next we meet the fiber of the coarse filter, the purpose of which is to prevent large particles of dirt and sand from entering the fuel line. ... We swim through the fiber and swim-swim-swim along the fuel line.
Here we also use oil “like pliers in a bathhouse”...

Next we plop into the filter fine cleaning, through a filter element that traps microscopic particles of debris at a level close to molecular. Here the fuel is freed from water particles that remain in the filter chamber. In the fine filter, the fuel flow is also freed from possible air bubbles. Oil here is also “neither for the village nor for the city.” ...

The first mechanism we can encounter is a low-pressure fuel priming pump. It is usually made in the form of a turbine, impeller, but more often, in the form of an eccentric... The task of this pump is to supply a particle of fuel to the high pressure pump. Here, in the fuel priming pump, the pumping element usually does not require lubrication with fuel itself, since it usually does not come into contact with anything, and if it does come into contact, it rubs against anything, then the density of this contact is minimal - there is practically no wear here - it is vanishingly small. In the small chamber of the fuel priming pump, the fuel is finally freed from air bubbles. As you can see, the oil is also "guest" here...

We get into the high pressure fuel pump. This is where there will probably be friction?...But no! And here it is minimal! The fact is that high-pressure pumps of Common Rail systems have the simplest piston design, due to the simplest and only purpose - creating and maintaining high pressure in the ramp (receiver) of the system. Moreover, pressure regulation is controlled not by the pump itself, but by its valves. For example, HDi diesel high-pressure pumps from Bosch have a three-piston radial design with short-stroke pistons. Friction against the cylinder walls is minimal here, the speed of movement of the pistons is also minimal, and the seal is created by “floating” bimetallic rings. By the way, the pistons and cylinders themselves have a metal-ceramic coating of friction surfaces, which also contributes to minimal friction and wear. By and large, this is NOT even a plunger pair...

In injection pumps of “classic” type injection systems, the plunger pairs have an ultra-precise design, the movement of parts occurs both in length and in angle. Moreover, this happens when the pressure is constantly changing from zero to high. The movement of the piston relative to the cylinder in the plunger pair has high speed and a large, constantly changing stroke... accordingly, high wear. And there is also the effect of cavitation (which, by the way, “finished off” pump-injector diesel engines, now almost extinct...) ...

That is why the oil in the fuel for the Common Rail high-pressure pump cannot have any noticeable effect on the properties of the rubbing surfaces and wear (which is practically absent).

Let's swim further... After the high-pressure pump we find ourselves at the ramp. For a particle of fuel, it’s the same if a person suddenly finds himself in a tank of cyclopean dimensions, in which there is one inlet and four (for four-cylinder engine) outlets to the injectors. There may also be a fifth hole through which the valve regulating the pressure in the rail bleeds excess fuel into the return line.

We float inside the nozzle along a thin capillary. We linger for a moment in the small chamber near the needle. And we rush headlong into the combustion chamber through the thin holes of the injector nozzle straight into the hell of air heated to a thousand degrees, ... in which a particle of fuel instantly burns ...

Common Rail injectors are fundamentally different from “classic” ones in that they are opened electronically, and not by fuel pressure. They have a compact, even miniature, and relatively simple design, almost like conventional gasoline injection engines. The fuel in them has virtually no contact with the pushing element.

In “classic” injectors, opened by fuel pressure, the pushing element directly interacts and is washed (and lubricated) by fuel. The design itself is very complex, and as a result, the “classic” nozzle is much larger in size. Friction and wear of the pushing element are “in full force” here.
But we have Common Rail...

The fact that the pushing element, needle, etc. Common Rail injectors experience tens (or maybe hundreds!) of times lower loads, including frictional ones, practically and virtually do not require lubrication and therefore have almost no contact with the fuel flow (they don’t need this), relative to diesel engine injectors with a “classic” type injection system, illustrated by the following pictures...

Pictured here are Bosch Common Rail injectors (widely used on HDi diesel engines)...
On the left is a nozzle with an electromagnetic pushing element, on the right - with a piezoelectric...

The capillary for fuel supply is highlighted in red. The pushing element, its rod, and other moving parts (the number of which is minimal, and for a piezoelectric injector they are practically absent) have an “eternal” supply of heat-resistant synthetic lubricant and anti-friction coating of friction surfaces, designed for the entire service life of the injector...

Below is a diagram of a diesel engine injector with a “classic” type injection system...
As you can see, its design is more complex and “rougher” than that of Common Rail, and the entire pushing element, the friction in its parts, is completely at the mercy of the fuel... The nozzle itself requires careful adjustment, and all this despite the fact that in the diagram...
The design of a “classic” type injector is still far from being the most complex...

And this is a diagram of a diesel engine injector with a pump-injector injection system...

As they say - feel the difference... The extremely complex (in some ways even to the point of absurdity), unreliable and cumbersome design ultimately “sentenced” the injection systems of this scheme, which are now completely supplanted by Common Rail...

There are also good illustrative examples oil getting into the CR type fuel system:

CONCLUSION. The benefits of using 2T oil are based solely on faith, so the advisability of its use is determined by the user’s faith in the effect of this method.