In today's review we will talk about two long-time rivals who were breathing down each other's necks: first one, then the other. If you were asked which crossover is better: Toyota Rav 4 or Nissan X-Trail, what would you answer?

Surely, if you are quite familiar with each model, you would say: “Depends on the year.” Indeed, when discussing both brands' lineups up to 2012, the clear favorite was the Rav4. However, with the release of the new generation, everything went exactly the opposite - in almost all indicators, the X-Trail became a leader. This concerned design, optional equipment, comfort and even dynamics.

The breakthrough was due to the constant lag behind Toyota over the years, and the developers, tired of the eternal “second” place, turned new model from catching up to leading. But this was, as we have already discussed, back in 2012. By 2016, both companies released restyled versions of their crossovers. Toyota tried to work on the mistakes and implement all its improvements, and Nissan intended to strengthen its once-occupied leading position. Who will be the favorite now? Let's get a look.

Appearance

The new Rav 4 body, released in 2012, was instantly criticized for its “femininity”. Indeed, not a trace of the former brutality remains. The car, in appearance, seems to be more suitable for the fair half of humanity. In contrast, the X-Trail's exterior was received with admiration. Aggressive "look" of new LED lights, a massive V-shaped insert on the front grille, a slightly inflated rounded silhouette - all these elements together created the image of an adult, strong, respectable, but at the same time modern crossover. The designers managed to combine courage and technology in one body. At the same time, he did not seem “chopped” and did not suffer from a “complex” of straight lines, unlike his classmate.

Four years later, Nissan's changes to the body are not particularly noticeable. They are certainly present, but do not significantly affect the image of the crossover, greatly changing it, unlike the pre-restyling version. Toyota has a more positive outlook. As we said, they worked on the bugs. New, now like the rival, LED headlights, additional bends of the hood and radiator grille add aggressiveness. The front design has been seriously redesigned. The face began to look prettier. But, according to many, the feeling of femininity still remains. Perhaps this is an aftertaste from the 2012 body, and buyers just need time to get used to it. However, for the domestic market this factor is to a certain extent a plus, since more and more women are switching from small cars to large crossovers.

To summarize the first part of the review, Nissan has the most attractive design that will find its connoisseurs among both men and women. Although the competitor was not far behind.

Interior and options

Comparing the 2012 models, according to these characteristics the X-Trail clearly won, but four years later the opponent caught up. At the moment, both brands have dashboards that are equal in ergonomics. At first glance, the Toyota “Torpedo” seems more modern and technically equipped. The car's temperament, which can be seen on the outside, is transmitted inside.

The Nissan salon has rounded, smooth lines that create the impression of comfort and lightness. Toyota's is more angular. The downside in both salons is the inaccessibility of certain buttons. The seat heating buttons for the first one are located on the central armrest, which requires the driver to be distracted from the road to adjust these indicators. And on the Rav4, these same buttons can be found at the very bottom of the central part of the dashboard. Moreover, they are located in such a way that you have to bend over to examine the position of the keys and press them correctly, and this certainly does not help safe driving. Judging objectively, the Nissan dashboard is more convenient and ergonomic, although the advantage is again not great.

In terms of interior finishing materials, we can give equal advantages in terms of fat content, although for the Rav4 this sign will be stretched. The leather inside looks very beautiful and is pleasant to the touch. But everything is spoiled by the rather hard plastic, which looks cheap and does not blend well with the skin. But such subtleties are not for everyone.

The electronic functionality of both models is at the same level: heated seats, parking sensors, cameras. It is noteworthy that the 2012 X-Trail had clear advantage— all-round view. Thanks to cameras around the perimeter of the body, the system displayed the image on the display in the form of a complete picture, “gluing” the fragments together. At the same time, the screen showed the car from above, and the driver could observe the movement of all existing objects around the car. Initially, Rafik did not have this option, but in the model we are considering it became available in more expensive trim levels. Competition is the engine of progress!

The Rav 4's dashboard and numbers look brighter and larger, which will undoubtedly be appreciated by users with visual impairments. In Nissan's favor, we can note the convenient location of the all-wheel drive system switch. It looks like a rotatable “puck” and is located on the center armrest under the driver’s arm. With its help, you can easily adjust the suspension modes, of which there are three in the crossover:

1. Front-wheel drive mode;
2. Auto front-wheel drive with possible connection of rear wheels (if the situation requires it);
3. Forced all-wheel drive mode.

To carry out the same manipulations in a competitor, you need to delve into a lot of buttons and remember correct sequence pressing them. Very inconvenient.

The X-Trail has a dual-zone climate control function, which its opponent does not have. But the Rav 4 fends off its classmate’s attack by having heated rear seats, in which the above-mentioned function loses its use. A point for each opponent.

Sound insulation is also approximately the same in both cars. The lineup The Rav 4, which rolled off the assembly line in 2012, was subject to serious criticism regarding this indicator. But the current model has corrected the errors of its younger brother.

In terms of space for passengers and seat comfort, everything is also about the same. Both the first and second rows of seats have sufficient space. The only difference is lateral stability in the front seats. Nissan is a little better. Although considering the presented class of cars, this indicator is not significant. We're not talking about sports cars. The X-Trail's rear seats slide back to create extra legroom for passengers, but this luxury comes at the expense of trunk space. By the way, Toyota clearly wins in terms of luggage capacity: 577 liters versus 497. In both brands, the rear seat backs fold down, providing more space, but this does not save Nissan. Toyota continues to lead: 1605hp. versus 1585l. If your priority is trunk space for fishing or hunting equipment, as well as a tent or suitcases, choose Rav 4.

Engine and transmission

Toyota Rav 4 today is available in three types of engines:

1. Petrol 2.0 l. power 146 hp;
2. Petrol 2.5 l. power 180 hp;
3. Turbodiesel 2.2 l. 150 hp

A classmate’s situation is approximately the same:

1. Petrol 2.0 l. power 144 hp;
2. Petrol 2.5 l. power 171 hp;
3. Diesel 1.6 l. power 130 hp

As you can see, Toyota engines of the same type produce an order of magnitude more horses than those of their opponents. This cannot but affect speed performance. Acceleration from 0 to hundreds in the Rafik is a second faster, and the car feels more dynamic. But, as the old saying goes: you have to pay for everything in this life. And we’re not just talking about cost here, although we’ll definitely get to that. For more pleasant acceleration, SUV drivers will have to pay more high flow rate fuel. If Nissan in a combined cycle is capable of consuming 7-8 liters per hundred, then this is a serious task for an opponent. And if you accidentally turned on the “sport” mode, then you can’t count on less than 11 liters.

One of the biggest advantages of Rav 4 is the presence automatic transmission, which the opponent does not have. Nissan offers only a 6-speed manual, and both models have a CVT.

Controllability

If you drove the 2012 Rav 4, forget everything you felt. As we said, Toyota has done a tremendous amount of work on the mistakes, and it affected not only the aesthetic component, but also the technological one. I was very pleased with the handling of the 2016 model - a worthy competitor to its Japanese classmate. But it is worth noting that despite approximately the same behavior on the road, the driver gets completely different sensations while sitting behind the wheel.

A smooth, measured ride does not cause any differences in both cars. True, the gas pedal of the X-Trail is more responsive than that of the Rav 4. The engine, combined with a continuously variable transmission, operates confidently and gains smooth but rapid acceleration. On slippery surfaces rear wheels They start working with a certain delay, but this is not very noticeable.

In contrast to him, his brother quiet ride almost free of slippage. The all-wheel drive system is set up like a clockwork - the wheels start working accurately and on time. However, the gas pedal here has a large “dead zone”. She reacts slowly, as if hinting to the driver not to forget about safety. But everything can change dramatically when you turn on the “sport” mode. The acceleration becomes no less lively than that of the opponent.

Both competitors respond well to steering input, although the Toyota has a slight edge. Both have similar braking and cornering performance. But, as you remember, we looked at them during a quiet ride. What animals will burst out from under the hood of rivals when sharp pressing on the gas and suddenly throw into a turn?

On high-speed sections there is a huge difference in sensations. First, let's take a ride in the Toyota. Driving at the limit of a car's capabilities is accompanied by adrenaline, spark, enthusiasm, rapid heartbeat, dilated pupils, but not in this crossover. The Rav4 confidently takes turns, where it behaves calmly and sometimes even phlegmatically. Yes, the car is stable and reliable, but you won’t feel any pleasure. She misses life. This applies not only to crossovers - as a rule, all the latest models of the brand have an excessive amount of calm. But if marketers and engineers put an emphasis on security, then everything is in the black. And the choice is up to you.

Nissan is a completely different car. He is frisky, perky, fast. It pushes you in the back and throws you from side to side in turns, as if flirting with you and provoking you to drive even more aggressively. At the same time, the machine copes with sharp corners perfectly at any “sane” speeds. It’s as if he’s saying: “Come on, buddy! Show me what you can do." Here you will appreciate the advantage of deeper front seats and the presence of side locking. However, unlike Toyota, the X-Trail does not have a “sport” mode. On the one hand, this may seem like a minus, but considering that it is already full of energy, some will not pay attention to it.

Here we come, perhaps, to the most important point in terms of crossover controllability - passing obstacles. How off-road are both cars? At first glance, the X-Trail has a clear advantage - ground clearance. It is 210 mm versus 197 mm for the competitor, and the front overhang is 910 mm versus 940 mm. Further comparison also shows Nissan's leadership, although not significant. A well-designed all-wheel drive control system, regulated by the same rotary washer that was mentioned in the interior, helps to take leadership in this matter. But the weak link of this crossover is the variator, which overheats excessively under heavy loads and at low speeds ensures “digging” into loose snow. Toyota attracts 6 step automatic, which will pull you onto a solid surface more reliably and predictably.

Price

As of 2017, in Russian showrooms the price for Nissan, depending on the engine and package of options, varies from 1,279,000 to 1,869,000 rubles. And the cost of Toyota starts at 1,493,000 and ends at 2,209,000 rubles. There is somewhere to roam. It is noteworthy that although the cost of Rav4 is higher, the company offers customers more choice option packages. Besides, this brand more strongly promoted Russian market and is in great demand, and this also affects the price.

Summarizing

It's hard to imagine more equal competitors than the Toyota Rav4 and Nissan X-Trail. They have no absolute disadvantages - what some would consider a minus, others would call an advantage. They are very similar, but incredibly different. The first is the standard of calm and confident driving, driving which your blood pressure will never rise, while the other flirts with you at every turn, improving your mood. But at the same time, they both cope well with all turns and obstacles, and also have the same stiffness suspension. The Rav has a roomy trunk, while the X-Trail has a more attractive interior. Nissan has a lower cost, but Toyota has a reputation. There is no winner in this duel, since it is impossible to compare a guitar and a violin to determine who is better. Each instrument plays individually beautifully, has advantages and has its own fans. Therefore, the choice is yours: Solid and balanced or Attractive and mischievous.

Both 2017-2018 cars are presented by Japanese auto companies.

They have improved many parameters, appearance, interior trim and technical equipment. characteristics.

The exterior of the Toyota Rav 4 has changed a lot, as can be seen from the front. In general, the front part of the new product has been updated: new bumper, optics, fog lights and the radiator grille have been updated quite significantly compared to the previous generation. From the side you can see other threshold trims, as well as a new frame for the wheel arches. In the rear you can see redesigned headlights, a bumper, and a fifth door trim.

As for the Nissan X-Trail, this car has changed a lot. The previous generation looked like an ordinary SUV, but now the model looks like a SUV. In general, the exterior of the car is sporty and elegant. The car is very similar to the Nissan Qashqai. WITH technical side The car has a more improved rigid chassis for better car handling.

Interior of Toyota Rav 4 and Nissan X-Trail

Interior decoration Toyota Rav 4 looks strict. We can say that the interior is “chopped”; straight outlines and corners are noticeable; only devices can be considered round. The updated car has a completely new instrument panel, it is made of expensive materials, and has also become more informative. Between the dials of the devices there is 4.2 inches. multifunctional screen with stunning graphics. The finishing materials of the door panels were also changed, the steering wheel and the inserts on the front panels were changed. In general, finishing materials are now expensive, but the top of the panel is also made of hard plastic.

The interior of the Nissan X-Trail is made completely differently. Smooth outlines, round surfaces. Soft plastic parts also larger – the doors and the top middle of the front panel are covered with a pliable product.

Everyone sits inside in complete comfort, both in one and the other car - here the cars are conveniently identical. The seats distribute loads perfectly and have good lateral support. A disadvantage in both cars can be considered the inconvenient placement of the seat heating buttons.

Video

Start of sales in Russia

Sales of Toyota Rav 4 latest version started at the end of last year. Sales of the new Nissan X-Trail will begin in mid-2017.

Options

• Standard – 2 hp engine. 146 “horses”, gasoline, gearbox – MT, front axle drive, acceleration – 10.3 s, speed – 180 km/h, consumption: 9.8/6.5/7.7
• Comfort - 2 liter engine. 146 “horses”, gasoline, gearbox – MT, front axle drive, acceleration – 10.3 s, speed – 180 km/h, consumption: 9.8/6.5/7.7
• Motor 2 l. 146 “horses”, gasoline, gearbox – variator, drive on the front axle and on both axles, acceleration – 11.1/11.3 s, speed – 180 km/h, consumption: 9.4/6.3/7.4; 9.5/6.4/7.5
• Prestige Black, Prestige, Exscluzive, Prestige Exscluzive - 2 liter engine. 146 “horses”, gasoline, gearbox – variator, drive on both axles, acceleration – 11.3 s, speed – 180 km/h, consumption: 9.5/6.5/7.5
• Engine 2.5 l. 180 “horses”, gasoline, AT gearbox, drive on both axles, acceleration – 9.5 s, speed – 180 km/h, consumption: 11.6/7.0/8.6

• XE – 2 liter engine. 144 “mares”, gasoline, gearbox – MT, CVT, front axle drive, acceleration – 11.1/11.7 s, speed – 183 km/h, consumption: 11.2/6.7/8.4; 9/6.2/7.2
• Motor 2 l. 144 “mares”, gasoline, gearbox – variator, drive on both axles, acceleration – 12.1 s, speed – 180 km/h, consumption: 9.5/6.5/7.6
• SE, SE+ - 2 liter engine. 144 “mares”, gasoline, gearbox – variator, drive on both the front axle and both axles, acceleration – 11.7/12.1 s, speed – 183/180 km/h, consumption: 9/6.2/7.2; 9.5/6.5/7.6
• LE Urban, LE, LE Urban+, LE+ - 2 liter engine. 144 “mares”, gasoline, gearbox – variator, drive on both the front axle and both axles, acceleration – 11.7/12.1 s, speed – 183/180 km/h, consumption: 9/6.2/7.2; 9.5/6.5/7.6
• Engine 1.6 l. 130 “mares”, diesel engine, transmission – MT, drive on both axles, acceleration – 11 s, speed – 187 km/h, consumption: 6.2/4.8/5.4
• Engine 2.5 l. 171 “horses”, gasoline, gearbox – variator, drive on both axles, acceleration – 10.5 s, speed – 191 km/h, consumption: 11.3/6.7/8.4

Dimensions

• L*W*H Toyota Rav 4 – 4605*1845*1670 mm
• L*W*H Nissan X-Trail – 4640*1820*1710 mm
• Ground clearance Toyota Rav 4 – 198 mm, Nissan X-Trail – 210 mm

Price of all configurations

Price Toyota Rav 4 from 1,460,000 rub. up to 2169000 rub. Price Nissan X-Trail from 1,409,000 rub. up to 2,000,000 rub.

Toyota Rav 4 and Nissan X-Trail engine

Toyota Rav 4 engines consist of: 2 gasoline power units - 2 liters, 146 “horses”, torque is 190 Newton per meter, 2.5 liter 180 “horses” - torque is 235 Newton per meter.

AND diesel unit 2.2 liters 150 “horses”, the torque of which is 340 Newton per meter. Acceleration with a gasoline unit: 10.3-11.3 s. The consumption of which is about 7.5 liters. And the speed is 180 km/h.

The Nissan X-Trail engine range consists of 3 power units: 2 liters. 144 “horses”, 1.6 liter diesel engine. 130 “horses” and 2.5 l. 171 "horses". Gearbox – “mechanics” and CVT-variator. Refuels with both gasoline and diesel. Acceleration time ranges from 11 to 12.1 seconds. Average gasoline unit“eats” about 7.4 liters of fuel. The maximum speed is 191 km/h.

Trunk of Toyota Rav 4 and Nissan X-Trail

The trunk of the Toyota Rav 4 is designed for 1705 liters. The trunk of the Nissan X-Trail is designed for 1585 liters.

Bottom line

Both cars are superbly equipped and have amazing technical specifications.

The Toyota RAV4 crossover recently received updated appearance and a modified chassis. Will these changes help it win in a comparison test with the new generation Nissan X-Trail? The fight promises to be interesting

The appearance of the Toyota RAV4 has changed quite significantly, especially when looking at the car from the front. Actually, the front end of the crossover is completely new: the bumper, headlights, fog lights and radiator grille have nothing in common with the pre-restyling model. On the sides of the body you can see modified door sills and new edgings wheel arches. The “stern” received redesigned lights, a bumper and a rear door trim.

Technical changes dictated by the wishes of clients. So, many complained about the stiff suspension. In this regard, the restyled model received softer springs and shock absorbers. And so that handling would not suffer, the designers increased the rigidity of the body. In addition, noise insulation has been significantly improved using absorbent floor coverings, the area of ​​which has increased by 55% compared to the pre-restyling model.

On the Russian market, modifications are offered with two gasoline engines of 2.0 and 2.5 liters, developing 146 and 180 hp, respectively. There is also a version with a 2.2-liter turbodiesel producing 150 hp. The price range for basic configurations is from 1,174,000 to 2,008,000 rubles.

The Nissan X-Trail has changed dramatically compared to the previous generation model. If the predecessor looked like a natural SUV, then the new product looks like a “SUV”, which it, in fact, is. In general, the design of the car is nice and sporty, but many people confuse it with the junior Nissan Qashqai - they are very similar. On the technical side, the crossover received a more rigid chassis for better handling.

In our country Nissan The X-Trail is sold with three powertrains. That's two gasoline engines(2.0 and 2.5 liters) with a capacity of 144 and 171 hp, as well as a 1.6-liter turbodiesel developing 130 hp. Prices basic versions start at 1,299,000 rubles and end at 1,826,000 rubles.

As often happens, there were no identical modifications in the press parks for the comparative test. Our Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a 2.5-liter 171-horsepower engine, while our RAV4 is equipped with a 2-liter unit with 146 hp. But both have CVTs. And in terms of the declared dynamic characteristics, they do not differ significantly.

Square and circle

Toyota's interior is austere. The design is “chopped”, consisting of straight lines and angles, with only roundness for the devices. By the way, the restyled model has a completely new dashboard, it looks more expensive than before and is better readable. A 4.2-inch display appeared between the instrument dials. multifunction display with great graphics. The finishing of the door panels, steering wheel and inserts on the front panel has changed. Overall, materials have become more expensive, although the top of the front panel is still made of hard plastic. But the window sills on the doors are soft to the touch.

Nissan salon - complete opposite Toyota. Smooth lines, rounded surfaces. And there is more soft plastic: the doors, as well as the top and central part of the front panel, are trimmed with pliable material. In short, in terms of the quality of finishing materials and fit interior panels our rivals are identical.

We also put an equal sign on the comfort of the seats and the geometry of the driving position. The range of adjustments for the seats and steering wheel allows people of different sizes to easily fit in both cars. The seats distribute loads well and have little lateral support. However, these are not sports cars, so they don’t need powerful lateral support. As for the right front seats, our competitors do not have height adjustment, which is typical for Japanese models.

Some ergonomic mistakes are also typical for the “Japanese”. For example, both crossovers suffer from an inconvenient location of the seat heating buttons. In Toyota they are located under the “influx” of the center console, forcing you to look under it, while in Nissan buttons are near central armrest, which makes you take your eyes off the road. Both handlebars are height-adjustable on a short arm, which is why top position They are located in a bus-like position. At night, not all the keys are illuminated, and if you don’t remember the location, it’s not easy to find them in the dark. And when we had to drive in loose snow, we at Toyota spent a lot of time looking for a button to turn off the stabilization system. However, regular owners, of course, sooner or later remember the location of the necessary keys.

But both Toyota and Nissan are well equipped. So, both have rear view cameras and heated windshields. Moreover, in the RAV4 there is also steering wheel It is heated - however, only in places of the correct grip. And when you get into a Toyota, your trousers remain clean even in the dirtiest weather, because the crossover doors completely cover the sills. But it’s almost impossible to get inside the X Trail without getting dirty.

In the second row, both rivals offer a surprising amount of space across the board. So, if a person 180 cm tall adjusts to suit himself front seat in a Toyota and sits back, there will be at least 15 cm left in front of his knees, and in a Nissan it’s even a couple of centimeters more. But there is more headroom in the RAV4, since its sofa is located much lower than in the X-Trail, which offers rear passengers a downright commanding position. But we liked the Toyota seat better, as its cushions are softer and longer. Both, by the way, have backrests that can be adjusted according to the angle of inclination. Nissan's sofa, unlike its rival's, moves back and forth, although this function no longer affects the comfort of passengers, but the space for luggage.

However, the luggage compartment of the X-Trail can somehow compete in volume with Toyota’s only if you move the rear seats all the way forward. In the usual configuration Nissan trunk noticeably smaller, and its loading height is greater. Under the floor of the Nissan model there is a full-fledged spare wheel, and Toyota offers a “replacement” tire. In fact, the full-fledged spare tire ate up some of the X Trail’s volume. The trunk in a Nissan can be divided into parts by removing part of the floor and installing a makeshift shelf on the side ledges. But these protrusions reduce the already small volume. When the second row seats are folded down, both have a flat surface.

They are so different

Nissan engine it works smoothly and imperceptibly, and the stepless variator provides the car with “trolleybus” acceleration. Moreover, the acceleration is quite fast even on a slippery surface. But it should be noted that when you sharply press the accelerator pedal, the front wheels have time to slip before the torque transfers to rear axle, although the delay is small. The engine responds to fuel supply smoothly and very lively, and even at high speeds its sound is not loud.

Toyota does not slip under intense acceleration. And not so much because less power power unit, but also due to the best settings of the all-wheel drive system. The accelerator pedal is more damped here, especially at low speeds. However, the character of the car can be changed by turning on the “sport” mode - then the reactions to the “gas” will become even sharper than in Nissan. The car changes so much that it seems that it will not lag behind its rival, despite the more than 20-horsepower loss in power. The CVT works no worse than in the X-Trail, and the engine at high speeds in the RAV4 has a more groovy timbre (Nissan, by the way, does not have a “sport” mode).

The brakes in standard modes do not cause any complaints from any of the competitors. But when slowing down in loose snow, we liked Toyota’s ABS settings better - the RAV4 stops faster in these conditions, and the deceleration is measured better.

Steering Toyota's is sharper than its rival's (about 2.7 turns from lock to lock versus exactly three), and when driving its steering wheel responds to control actions a little faster. Despite this, the RAV4 is perceived as a calmer car. In principle, both competitors respond to control actions in a timely and adequate manner, without the delays inherent in machines with a high center of gravity. But when driving fast On a winding road, these crossovers differ like heaven and earth.

So, X-Trail literally turns on the driver, provoking him to attack corners at the limit adhesion properties tires The car behaves like a sports car, rushing into turns without hesitation. And it stands perfectly on the arc, exhibiting slight understeer at the limit.

In Toyota, the driver feels as if he has taken a good dose of sedative. At the same time, the RAV4 moves more stable and reliably in corners than its rival, but it does not evoke the desire to be fast. Actually, both of our competitors are distinguished by good chassis balance and in extreme modes they are controlled very similarly, only they give different sensations. It is difficult to choose the best of them in terms of handling, since it all depends on personal preferences. On the highway, both “Japanese” cars confidently stay straight, despite the bumps and ruts.

Modified during restyling Toyota suspension Indeed, it has become softer than the pre-reform version, but the car still goes over bumps tightly and collectedly, and on a wavy road it repeats its profile in quite detail. In a word, the RAV4 has not turned into a “sofa”. Although the X-Trail does not look like a feather bed: its chassis is tuned rigidly, and shocks on uneven surfaces feel about as dense and elastic as that of a competitor. And in terms of sound insulation, the crossovers are equal. The main source of noise for both is winter tires. Moreover, it is muffled quite well in both Nissan and Toyota, and if the RAV4 is compared with the pre-restyling modification, then the difference is very noticeable precisely in terms of isolation from road noise.

Both crossovers need to be driven carefully into mud or snow. The geometric cross-country ability of both Toyota with a ground clearance of 197 mm and Nissan with 210 mm ground clearance is quite decent, and the approach and departure angles are not bad, but it should be taken into account that there are CVTs here. We didn’t torture the cars too much, so it didn’t come to the point of overheating, but both of us had problems with dosing thrust at low speed. And this is fraught with rapid digging when driving on loose and loose surfaces - traditional automatic transmissions behave much better in such conditions. However, the RAV4 with a more powerful 2.5-liter engine is equipped with an automatic transmission, although it has a ground clearance of only 165 mm. But the diesel Toyota versions and there is an automatic transmission, and 197 mm ground clearance. So there is a choice. U X-Trail versions It doesn’t happen with an automatic. Both perform well on hard ground, since the energy capacity of their suspensions is excellent.

So our rivals are very close. This means the choice between calm Toyota character and the active drive of Nissan is a matter of personal preference. But if we approach the matter from a practical point of view, then the RAV4 offers buyers more options.

Specifications Nissan X-Trail
Dimensions, mm	4640x1820x1715
Wheelbase, mm
Turning diameter, m
Ground clearance, mm
Trunk volume, l
Curb weight, kg

Within the margin of error, how much is it? Liter? Horsepower? Kilometer? Nissan X-Trail, Toyota RAV4 and Mitsubishi Outlander similar in body size, powertrain output and price tags. The duelists are close and operational characteristics. Looking ahead, let's say that in general assessments the trio of crossovers showed similar results - there is no clear leader here. But the cars are different! Each with their own character and temperament. Everyone has their own buyer. Who knows, maybe within this error lies everyone’s individuality?

After restyling, the design of the RAV4 became more expressive and the coloring became brighter. According to statistics, the crossover is popular among young people aged 25-35 years

First of all, design. If you divide cars into “boys” and “girls,” then the RAV4 is definitely female. The flirting appearance of Toyota against the backdrop of the deliberate aggression of Mitsubishi and the brutality of Nissan seems to hint at a warm relationship. What about the color? Were the Toyota colorists really given colored markers? Bright! In addition, the Ravik is more compact: 35 mm shorter than the X-Trail and 90 mm shorter than the Outlander. Wheelbase: minus 45 and 10 mm, respectively.

Toyota's "two-story" panel consists of many parts. A little old fashioned. In addition, dust accumulates in numerous interfaces

Instruments and controls are simple and clear. Access to functionality thanks to the sloping front panel is excellent. But the lower buttons were in the “blind” zone. In addition, only narrow flash drives fit into the USB port. But you can put a mug with a handle in the cup holder

However, a compact body is not a hindrance to capacity. In the longitudinal direction, there is even a little more space in Toyota than in other crossovers. It's convenient for the driver. Underneath is a chair with a calibrated profile and moderate lateral support, in front there is a two-tier front panel with exposed instruments. The “top floor” is clear, but for other benefits you will have to go down to the “basement”. Keys for secondary functions - such as heated seats or an electric tailgate - are hidden at the very bottom of the panel. But the button to turn off the stabilization system is in a visible place: in the right corner of the narrow embrasure of the central display. Go figure!

The RAV4 has great front seats! Both the profile and installation height are optimal. There is slightly more space in the second row than competitors. And the sofa is perhaps the most comfortable. But the “gallery” is poorly equipped - a 12V socket and pockets. The trunk has an impressive volume (577-1605 l) and is equipped with a sliding hammock. The decoration is modest, sockets and boxes for small items are not provided. Under the floor - "dokatka"

Toyota's feature is a panoramic view system with a 360-degree view effect. Four cameras convert the image into a full-fledged “top view”. Cool stuff, but the screen of the updated multimedia system is still small. However, huge side mirrors and narrow body pillars make it easy to navigate in space. And the dimensions in the RAV4 feel better than in other cars.

After another exterior update, Outlander literally began to shine. The crossover is generously trimmed with chrome

The Outlander's interior is closer to classic. The design is simpler, there are fewer buttons. Here, as in Toyota, the reach of the steering column is a bit small, but it’s not difficult to find your position in the driver’s seat. In terms of comfort, the seat is no worse than Toyota's, but the upholstery... is rough to the touch, shiny leather. Is it leather?! Although other interior materials are quite high quality. There are a lot of soft panels, and the gear selector paddles are made of aluminum. You touch the cast parts with your fingertips and think... after all, the “manual” mode is pampering!

Simple, but tasteful. And there are no serious problems with ergonomics. Note the separate ventilation deflectors for the driver and front passenger

In terms of ease of control of minor functions, Mitsubishi is similar to Toyota: large scales and buttons. Except that the multimedia system is overloaded with symbols, and system controls are chaotically scattered across the front panel. The gear shift paddles are mounted on the column rather than on the steering wheel.

Outlander's visibility is approx. The mirrors are large, the pillars are not wide, again like in the RAV4. But the rear doorway is narrower, and the doors open at a small angle. The amphitheater seating forces you to climb onto the back sofa, which is also stuffed with hard stuffing. You can't sit on this for long. And when landing, you need to lift your legs higher: the doors, unlike Toyota, do not cover the sills, and it’s easy to get dirty. By the way, Nissan is guilty of the same thing.

The seats are a little stricter and tougher than Toyota's, but just as welcoming. Spaciousness in the second row contributes high installation front seats, but there are no deflectors here either. Despite its larger size, the Outlander's trunk is the most modest: 477-1640 liters. But you need to take into account that only here there is an underground with a number of spacious drawers. Full spare tire on cast disk suspended under the bottom

The front panel of the X-Trail is massive and solid. The seats are curvaceous, and the variator selector stands on the central podium. You feel as if you are in a car of a higher class. And only in Nissan the rotary washer is responsible for all-wheel drive modes. This switch is much more convenient than push-button transmission control. Plus, the X-Trail is nicer in small ways: the steering wheel has a longer reach, the instrument cluster display is larger, and the central cup holders are cooled. The only thing that spoils the karma of the crossover is inappropriate savings on light bulbs - the power window unit, consider it, without backlighting.

The X-Trail looks larger than it actually is. However, in our opinion, Nissan has the most advantageous appearance

Light upholstery adds “deceptive” space to the Nissan interior. In fact, there is a little less freedom here than in competitors. For example, if there is panoramic roof There is a gap of just over five centimeters above the head. In Toyota and Mitsubishi - twice as much. There is enough headroom in the longitudinal direction, but there is not enough space for feet under the driver's seat. You won't be able to stretch out your legs like in other crossovers. However, what are we talking about - there is still enough space!

The smooth contours of the front panel set you up for a relaxing ride. The two-tone interior is elegant, but easily soiled

The interior of Nissan has a little more elegance, which does not interfere with information content and convenience. Serious puncture - “dark” power window unit hidden behind the door handle

The Nissan seat will appeal to big people. Thin people will fidget. The rear sofa can be moved longitudinally by 40 cm, increasing the trunk volume. Passengers in the second row, although they prop up the front seats with their knees, will be quite capable of sitting through a short trip. Only the X-Trail has rear ventilation deflectors. Nissan trunk volume 497-1585 liters. The back of the sofa consists of three doors, and the floor can be installed on two levels. The spare tire is full, but there is almost no room for small things

In general, in static exercises we have approximately equality. Taking into account errors, of course. If one of the participants leaves a small gap in a separate nomination, then the rivals immediately catch up with him in others. However, “dynamics” promises greater variety.

The Nissan camera produces the highest quality picture. Toyota has a 360-degree perimeter view feature. Mitsubishi has the largest screen

For example, Toyota is slightly more powerful than both competitors, and most importantly, the 180-horsepower 2.5 liter version is equipped with a classic automatic transmission. You can feel it: the RAV4 accelerates tightly, with a minimum of transmission losses. The crossover engine pulls well at low speeds, but in order for it to drive properly, you need to drive the tachometer needle to the upper sector of the scale. In the dash to the first hundred, Toyota is faster than Nissan and Mitsubishi both in terms of performance (9.4 seconds versus 10.5 and 10.2, respectively) and in feel. And everything would be fine, but sometimes, getting confused between gears, automatic transmission allows unpleasant jerks.

The 2.5 liter engine paired with an automatic transmission pleases with its torque at low speeds and activity at the top. The “steel” solo of the engine is clearly audible in the cabin, but you even want to make this “music” louder. But on the contrary, I would like to reduce the road noise

Mitsubishi is slightly behind Toyota. Mainly due to the fault of the variator, which begins to “pull the rubber” just during intense acceleration “to the floor”. When driving calmly, his habits return to normal, and when starting from a standstill, the responses to the gas are so sharp that a jerk can be avoided only with very careful handling of the accelerator. But Outlander instantly responds to fuel supply. And in terms of acoustic comfort, Mitsu is preferable. During last update(and remember, there were three of them in total) the crossover’s noise insulation was improved to a completely acceptable level.

The Outlander responds to the accelerator without a hitch. And it has excellent throttle control in corners, changing trajectory when distributing weight. But due to the low grip properties of the tires, it is better not to push it to the limits.

X-Trail - golden mean. Reactions to gas are smoothed out, the variator is connected to the engine more tightly, and the imitation of changing stages is felt more clearly than in the Outlander. Perhaps that is why this pair, despite the differences in mass and engine output, accelerates neck and neck. It’s curious, but behind the wheel of the massive X-Trail it seems like you’re the one faster than your opponent. Once again the deception of large forms.

The smooth operation of the naturally aspirated four and CVT create the illusion of a V6 engine. Provided that the tachometer does not exceed 3500 rpm

I liked the chassis setup. Nissan seems to crush small and medium-sized bumps with its weight. The suspension copes with bridge joints effortlessly, speed bumps move in two jumps. And only on large potholes do the shock absorbers rattle unpleasantly. The X-Trail is controlled calmly, as if lazy. It reacts to the steering wheel with a slight pause, but then draws turns, like a pencil on a pattern. There seems to be enough feedback. At the same time, the chassis limits are quite high. The crossover holds onto its trajectory for a long time, and only when the speed is clearly too high does it begin to slide with the front axle.

The X-Trail holds a straight line firmly. It does not react to rutting and does not require steering. Only a large hole can throw a crossover off course.

Outlander does the opposite. If you pull away too quickly, you can cause the wheels to slip. A sharp accelerator is adjacent to an equally sharp steering wheel, to the deflection of which the crossover reacts instantly. The steering wheel is accurate, but uninformative. What is happening in the contact patch of the wheels with the road is absolutely not felt. True, this does not hinder attacking turns at all. It's disappointing that the Mitsubishi starts to slide early. The speed seems to be low, but the tires squeak and the trajectory straightens out. The “slippery” ones are definitely to blame for this. Goodyear tires Eagle.

The Mitsubishi Outlander has the most exciting handling. At the same time, comfort with a working suspension is at the level

In terms of comfort, Mitsubishi is inferior to Nissan. There are more disturbances from unevenness in the cabin, potholes reverberate more strongly, and shocks come to the steering wheel. In addition, in asphalt ruts, the crossover drags to the side. At the same time, you can literally drive down a country road without breakdowns or body bumps. Let us note that our Outlander managed to run more than 30,000 km “under journalists”. We are sure that some of the complaints are related to suspension wear.

Braking performance is similar between crossovers, but the RAV4 sends a little more information to the driver.

The Toyota rolls over bumps like an overinflated ball. The suspension is harsh, and most of the road defects are clearly felt in the cabin. There would be no point in enduring discomfort if it were not for the exemplary energy intensity elastic elements: RAV4 is not afraid even of overweight speed bumps. And the handling is fine. The crossover is characterized by moderately sharp reactions and a tenacious suspension. At the limit - demolition. True, the rolls are a bit high, but among our duelists no one rides “horizontally” in turns.

When driving off-road in a Toyota, ESP must be turned off. Otherwise, the electronics will choke the motor and the crossover will get stuck. Without insurance and blocked multi-plate clutch The RAV4 drives very confidently, but its cross-country ability is limited by its modest ground clearance of 185 mm and exhaust pipe hanging under the engine compartment

Pros of the Outlander: ground clearance - 215 mm and instant response to fuel supply. In addition, the crossover actively reacts to the redistribution of mass, which allows you to pass through slippery areas in rally style. Off-road is a joy!

The X-Trail electronics work correctly, but no significant difference was noted when driving in automatic all-wheel drive mode and with a locked clutch (in this case, the traction between the axles is distributed equally between the axles). In addition, the Nissan variator has neither a power mode (like the Mitsubishi) nor a manual mode (like the Toyota automatic)

We weigh all the pros and cons and get this alignment. Nissan X-Trail is slightly ahead. The brutal crossover is gifted with a lush interior and a well-tuned chassis. But at the same time it does not provoke the family driver to rash actions. Positive hero!

Toyota RAV4 in the middle. This (or this?) can neither be criticized nor praised. He does everything correctly and does not deviate from the regulations. If it loses to competitors, it is in unprincipled aspects. But he always wins big. Actually, for the suspension and reliability, “Ravik” is forgiven a lot. In short, complete RAV news.

The error in prices for tested crossovers with 2.4-2.5 liter engines is exactly 100,000 rubles. The most affordable is Nissan X-Trail: 1,749,000-1,999,000 rubles. Then Mitsubishi Outlander: 1,839,990-1,979,990 rubles. More expensive than the rest Toyota RAV4: 1,850,000-2,168,000 rubles

The Mitsubishi Outlander was a little behind. Aggressive appearance“Japanese” matches the chassis settings, but it lacks what Toyota and Nissan have in stock - calmness. However, it can be formulated in another way: the Outlander has something that the RAV4 and X-Trail do not have. And then the priority table will turn upside down. It’s just that each of the cars is aimed at a specific audience. Taking into account the margin of error, of course.

Technical characteristics of the tested vehicles (manufacturers' data)

	Nissan X-Trail	Toyota RAV4	Mitsubishi Outlander
Body
Type	Station wagon (SUV)	Station wagon (SUV)	Station wagon (SUV)
Number of seats/doors	5/5	5/5	5/5
Engine
Type	Petrol	Petrol	Petrol
Engine location	Front transverse	Front transverse	Front transverse
Number and arrangement of cylinders	4, in a row	4, in a row	4, in a row
Working volume, cubic meters cm	2488	2494	2360
Power, hp at rpm	171/6000	180/6000	167/6000
Torque, Nm at rpm	233/4000	233/4100	222/4100
Transmission
Drive unit	Full	Full	Full
Transmission	CVT (CVT)	6-automatic	CVT (CVT)
Brakes
Front	Ventilated disc	Ventilated disc	Ventilated disc
Rear	Disk	Disk	Ventilated disc
Suspension
Front		Independent, spring, McPherson	Independent, spring, McPherson
Rear		Semi-independent, spring, multi-link	Independent, spring, multi-link
Dimensions, volume, weight
Length/width/height, mm	4640x1830x1715	4605x1845x1715	4695x1800x1680
Wheelbase, mm	2705	2660	2670
Ground clearance, mm	210	197	215
Curb weight, kg	1659/1701	1670-1705	1505
Volume fuel tank, l	60	60	60
Trunk volume, l	497-1585	577-1605	477-1640
Tires	225/60 R18	235/55 R18	225/55 R18
Dynamic characteristics
Maximum speed, km/h	190	180	198
Acceleration to 100 km/h, sec.	10,5	9,4	10,2
Fuel consumption, l/100 km
Combined cycle	8,3	8,6	7,7
CO2 emissions, g/km, eq. Class	192/Euro-4	200/Euro-5	n/a/Euro-5
Cost of the car, rub.
Basic equipment	1 749 000	1 850 000	1 839 990

Safety

Nissan X-Trail

Toyota RAV4

Mitsubishi Outlander

Equipped with security systems
	Nissan X-Trail	Toyota RAV4	Mitsubishi Outlander
Front airbags	+	+	+
Side airbags	+	+	ABOUT
Curtain airbags	+	+	ABOUT
Driver/passenger knee airbag	-/-	+/-	ABOUT/-
Inflatable seat belts for rear passengers	-	-	-
ESP stabilization system	+	+	ABOUT
Traction control system TCS	+	+	-
Anti-lock braking system ABS	+	+	+
Brake Assist	+	+	+
Rear View Camera	ABOUT	ABOUT	ABOUT
Parktronic	ABOUT	ABOUT	ABOUT
Parking assistance system	ABOUT	ABOUT	-
LED headlights	ABOUT	ABOUT	ABOUT
Xenon headlights	-	-	-
Adaptive headlights	-	-	-
Lane Change Assistance System	ABOUT	ABOUT	-
Marking tracking system	ABOUT	ABOUT	-
Forward Collision Avoidance System	-	ABOUT	-
Traffic Sign Recognition System	-	ABOUT	-
Driver fatigue monitoring system	ABOUT	ABOUT	-
Turning on the hazard warning lights during emergency braking	+	+	+

Photobonus

Video bonus

My father had one like this. 2007, purchased at the beginning of 2008 in the showroom new. Assembly Japan. Gasoline 2.0 with CVT.

Up to 60,000 km. no problem. At 60, the front brake discs were changed for the first time; they came off on 2 sets of pads (i.e., the pads were changed every 30 thousand). Also at 60 t.km. The front support bearings were replaced - they began to knock after frequent trips on gravel roads.

At 75! t.km. We changed the rear brake discs for the first time, also after two sets of pads. So we had no complaints about the brakes. But parents travel a lot on the highway in Belarus. At some point, they required replacement of the stabilizer link (well, this is a cheap thing). Towards the end of the warranty (100t.km.) the rear wheel bearings were replaced.

Strengths:

• Trunk,
• reliability,
• economical…

Weak sides:

• The design of both the exterior and interior is controversial,
• weak noise,
• dynamics only for moving from A to B

Review of Nissan X-Trail 2.0 4WD (Nissan X-Trail) 2012

Review of Nissan X-Trail 2.0 4WD (Nissan X-Trail) 2008 Part 3

I don’t know about anyone, but for me it happens that there comes a moment when a “demon in the rib” takes possession and I understand that it’s time to change the car. Moreover, if earlier this was somehow justified - domestic cars began to fall apart, in the case of the X-Trail everything is more than in order, the car is fully operational, does not bother anyone with any glitches, the design is not boring, from OD with their “inflated” prices I’ve been untied for two years already, I wish I could live and be happy, but no, I spent the whole of September visiting various car dealerships, looking for and trying on my next car. At the same time, they decided to change my wife’s Avensis to something more passable, because... It got stuck in our yards several times during the winter. So I looked at a lot of crossovers, both “female” and “male”, and once again became convinced how a good choice made in 2008

Almost 90 thousand kilometers have been covered, the car is more than 5 years old, the only unscheduled work is the replacement of light bulbs (imagine, this simple procedure has to be done at a service station) and both bumpers - the front one was damaged by one inattentive citizen, to whom I had the imprudence to give way so that he I drove backwards out of the parking lot, and I myself drove the rear one into some trench so that it cracked from the bottom on both sides. Yes, I contacted service twice more with the same problem - it stopped opening from the outside backdoor. The second time, the servicemen said that this is a common phenomenon in these cars - in cold weather, something freezes inside, if you pull the handle too hard, the cable flies off the guide and the door stops opening. That's basically all the problems.

Thousands changed both by 50 rear shock absorbers, the service life of Goodyear Ultra Grip tires turned out to be approximately the same, spark plugs, pads - according to the regulations. The average consumption was set at 11.2-11.3 liters, but it should be taken into account that on weekdays I get to work and back for at least an hour, and sometimes even more than 2, covering 17 km, so the engine cannot be called voracious. The most amazing thing is that the consumption practically does not depend on the load, whether traveling alone or with five people with a full trunk of things - the numbers are approximately the same. At the same time, under load the car becomes more collected, or something, it just sticks to the road, he likes it :).

Strengths:

Weak sides:

• I came to terms with the lack of MP3, and with the poor sound insulation, and with the stupid curtain in the trunk. The only thing I can’t come to terms with is why can’t I change the light bulbs myself (this applies not only to Nissan)

Review of Nissan X-Trail 2.0 4WD (Nissan X-Trail) 2008

Initially, I chose a car to replace a Chevrolet Niva, which did not please with its reliability or comfort, what irritated me most were the constant minor and not very breakdowns, like in a Lada, you always have to do something, the transmission howls, etc. general owners car data is up to date...

I bought the car for my father, I couldn’t watch him suffer in the field anymore, considering that the biggest off-road terrain he drives on is the road to the dacha, and to pick mushrooms in the forest, otherwise the city cycle and the highway, with his grandchildren, where then go, transport something big. In principle, my father agreed to a passenger car after driving my Lacetti, but knowing that his dream was still a ZHD (that’s why he took the Niva), he began searching for a 4 WD. There were many options: Rav4, Pajero, Duster, X-trail, Cr-v. Toyota is a little small, not the highest ground clearance, and the trunk is not very roomy, Mitsubishi is good, frame construction, locking transfer case, powerful motor, and the appearance is representative, the expense scared me off, and all these locks with the transfer case are still unnecessary, besides, you can’t get a fresh one for 17 thousand (and that was my budget at that time). Honda is also out of the question, not the best car for a business person, more likely for a young guy and a driving drive, and the price is steep. Duster a good option and if you add a little, you can take it from the interior, but the Renault nameplate and the poor design (in my opinion) did not allow me to buy it.