Summer, like last year, has come to its logical and rapid end. And together with the summer, we will soon only dream of clean and dry roads, into the arms of which the wheels of our cars rushed with pleasure. It's time to think about winter car "shoes".

This material, which represents the best winter tires of 2012, should not be taken as the ultimate truth, however, we tried to compile data from different test drives and ratings: here you can find polls in which Russian car owners massively participated, real tests of 2012 winter tires, carried out by authoritative publications, reviews of users of specialized sites on which tires are sold, as well as research data from specialists of the German edition of Autobild.

PREMIUM CLASS

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5

These car tires have been among the most reliable and popular winter tires on the market for several years now. When developing this rubber, the Finnish manufacturer was guided by the needs that drivers experience in winter, so a car wearing these tires will never be unpredictable on a snowy or icy road.

The Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5 tires have an exclusive tread build-up that keeps the Bear Claw cleat in a position for the best traction, both during braking and powerful acceleration. In addition, a unique technology is used in the tires, which uses 4 rubber compounds. The rubber swallows the studs while riding on hard surfaces, ensuring their durability. So if you are looking for the best winter tires of 2012, we recommend that you consider this rubber as an option.

Dignity: studs adhere to the road perfectly, good acceleration dynamics and handling, minimal braking marks on snow and ice, there is a snowflake indicator, which indicates the degree of tire wear

Flaws: quite a lot of noise when driving on an asphalt road, Russian-made tires are much worse than Finnish ones, relatively fast tread wear

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5 tire review by Michael (Toyota Noah)

"Great tires, noise compensates for good grip!"

Michelin Latitude X-Ice North 2

When the specialists of the French company developed the Michelin Latitude X-Ice North 2 tires, they used all the experience gained during their participation in rally races in the Nordic countries. The result is a tire that can withstand heavy loads and provide excellent grip on snowy roads, even if the driver is sporty. To do this, the tire design used such technologies as the "active" Full Active Tread tread, the placement of sipes according to the Stabiligrip system, the toothed edges of the tread blocks, which improves traction with compacted snow, the center of the tread, made like a tank track, special snow blades on shoulder areas of the tread, super-hard alloy stud, as well as a reinforced tire sidewall. When answering the question “Which winter tires are better?” 2012 does not forget about the Michelin Latitude X-Ice North 2, so don't pass by.

Dignity: stability when starting, accelerating and braking, entering corners without slipping, high-quality studding, high maneuverability, durability and cross-country ability

Flaws: too echoing when driving on asphalt, but not enough to make a tragedy out of it

Review of Michelin Latitude X-Ice North 2 tires by Vladislav (Skoda Yeti)

“I have already traveled on this rubber for two winters (about 20 thousand). Due to its softness, rubber has a slight noise characteristic. The pattern allows the tires to "drag" the vehicle across the snow. Paired with ABS, it is very easy to steer the car when braking. Dry asphalt is already worse handled. The tires are great! "

Continental ContilceContact

The rating of winter studded tires also includes Continental ContiIceContact tires, specially designed for comfortable driving on snowy and icy surfaces. Its main advantages are sinusoidal stepped sipes, technology that helps to effectively remove the ice crust, Brilliant Plus spikes, as well as a reinforced side surface and base layer.

It is worth dwelling in more detail on the spikes of this rubber. Brilliant Plus cleats with slightly longer edges are firmly fixed in the tread. This prevents them from falling out of the tire and can significantly reduce the stopping distance - by about 10% when compared to tires that use standard studs.

Dignity: high European quality, the spikes are fixed as firmly as possible, excellent handling on slush, ice, as well as wet and dry asphalt

Flaws: quite noisy

Review of Continental ContiIceContact tires by Boris (Peugeot 308)

“I spent two seasons in Moscow, more than once, thanks to this rubber, I climbed the icy slopes, walked on porridge and dry asphalt - I always felt confident enough. I did a little bit only on fresh coarse snow at minus thirty. I lost only one thorn in one season. "

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R

An overview of 2012 winter tires would be incomplete if we did not mention the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R. These tires are primarily distinguished by their excellent performance on icy highways in a real winter, which with its severity can freeze the whole of Africa from a distance. Stable, precise and obedient handling and confident machine behavior.

The high tread strength of Nokian Hakkapeliitta R tires is due to the base, which contains rapeseed oil, silica and natural rubber. All this helps to reduce rolling resistance and fuel consumption, as well as (cheer up "green"!) To minimize harmful emissions into the atmosphere.

Dignity: soft and very durable, ideally holds the road on wet and dry asphalt, does not make a lot of noise, when compared with studded tires, the balance of all characteristics and predictability of the behavior of a car when driving dynamically around the city, "shod" in these tires, is an order of magnitude higher , noiselessness

Flaws: skips a little on porridge, if the temperature rises above five degrees, it becomes almost impossible to ride, on fresh snow, and also on porridge, side drift is observed, rather weak cord

Review of Nokian Hakkapeliitta R tires by Alexander (ACURA RDX)

“Excellent tires, excellent road holding. I drove on spikes before, but I like these tires better, because only braking is negative, but otherwise everything is even better. The one who stalls from the noise generated by studded tires will understand. "

Bridgestone Blizzak WS60

No rating of studless winter tires is complete without the genius of the Japanese. Bridgestone engineers from the Land of the Rising Sun call the Bridgestone Blizzak WS-60 tires their next masterpiece. The properties of the rubber compound of these tires are used literally at the molecular level, which makes it possible to increase the level of grip on icy and snow-covered roads and reduce rolling resistance. The maximum efficiency of the tires is ensured by a special composition of rubber, which is included in the rubber compound. It contains silicon, which makes rubber resilient and elastic.

It is generally known that sliding on ice is caused by the formation of a microscopic water film between the sliding object and the icy road surface. Bridgestone Blizzak WS-60 tires use a tread that removes the bulk of the water through special channels, and the rest of the rubber compound draws in its pores. To put it simply, the car, shod with these tires, moves on a slippery road, as if on suction cups.

Dignity: durability, wear resistance, softness and noiselessness, high-quality micropores, excellent handling on packed snow

Flaws: insufficient braking on ice, with a sharp start it is quite predictable wheel slip

Bridgestone Blizzak WS-60 tire review by Arthur (Citroen Xsara)

“I bought these tires in Finland and now I am sure that this is the next generation of winter tires. Quiet and soft, overcomes porridge without any problems, behaves tolerantly even on ice. I staged it in October last year, skated both on asphalt and on ice, the difference, in principle, is small. "

Michelin Primacy Alpin PA3

The 2012 winter tire test showed that the Michelin Primacy Alpin PA3 tire differs from its predecessors in improved handling on snowy and icy road surfaces, as well as reduced braking distance on wet roads.

The main distinguishing features of Michelin Primacy Alpin PA3 tires are Helio Compound technology (the rubber compound contains sunflower oil), which allows the rubber to maintain its characteristics at low temperatures; directional tread pattern, which provides high handling when driving on a wet road; 7% reduction in rolling resistance thanks to Stabiligrip technology (special arrangement of lamellas with different thicknesses).

Dignity: excellent road holding both on asphalt and on ice, noise below average, great for city driving

Flaws: Tire confidence is reduced when ice covers a layer of fresh snow, slippage when starting off

Michelin Primacy Alpin PA3 tire review by Valet (VW Passat)

“The tires are very calm. There is not even a hint of instability in the skid. It doesn't matter what is under the wheels - the driver always knows exactly where the car will stop. No surprises when driving in winter. You can safely go over a hundred and not worry about moving the car. "

MIDDLE CLASS

Pirelli winter carving

The Italian manufacturer, in cooperation with the Volvo concern, has produced Pirelli Winter Carving tires, which were created specially for the harsh Scandinavian winter conditions and simply could not fail to be included in the 2012 winter tire rating.

The design features of the tires include the latest technology of twelve-row studding, a new rubber compound of three polymers that can withstand heavy loads in the range from minus 40 ° C to plus 7 ° C, rubber elasticity achieved thanks to Adaptive Compound Technology. Many automakers today recommend Pirelli Winter Carving for winter driving and lightning-fast weather conditions.

Dignity: excellent value for money, excellent behavior on snow, ice and slush, directional stability, high wear resistance

Flaws: low profile, which can make tires appear harsh, high noise level

Pirelli Winter Carving tire review by StReAm (Audi A6)

“The rubber is very soft, it behaves well during active driving, while on dry asphalt it seems as if there are no spikes at all. Considering all the requirements that a car makes for handling, I can confidently say that I will buy this rubber again, if necessary, if something better does not appear. "

Goodyear Ultra Grip 500

Of the design features of these tires, it should be especially noted the unique arrangement of the studs, calculated by a special computer program, the V-TRED technology, which nullified the effect of aquaplaning, the 3D-BIS lamella technology, which contributes to comfortable control and high strength indicators, the SATS anchoring technology, "Tread-sandwich", consisting of two types of rubber compound.

Dignity: excellent handling even on dry clean asphalt, low noise, softness, high cross-country ability

Flaws: bad behavior on snow porridge, ABS often and quite early triggers, weak sidewalls

Goodyear Ultra Grip 500 Tire Review by Mouse (Citroen C4)

“The rubber left for 4 seasons, however, the thorns got confused after two seasons. It makes a little noise and drives the car on the asphalt. But, leaving for the snow porridge, it just flies. "

Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 7000

The Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 7000 tire was announced by the Japanese back in 2010 and is the evolution of the Ice Cruiser 5000 tire and has long been one of the best-selling products in markets with high demand for winter studded tires. The new "ice cruiser" also has new qualities: oblique sipes and reinforced sidewalls of tires, large central tread blocks and a new stud, which was developed by the Sitek bureau from Germany.

Dignity: good cross-country ability, excellent handling on different surfaces, low noise, resistance to deformation, wear resistance, informative braking

Flaws: rather difficult stabilization after skidding

Review of the tires Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 7000 user Ekaterina (VAZ2112)

“I bought these tires at the end of winter and so far I am very happy. I decided to specifically check them, so I climbed everywhere: into a snow mush, buried myself in the snow, and even went out onto bare ice. Now I can say for sure that the tires are worth their money, because they have passed all the tests. "

Continental ContiCrossContact Viking

The main distinguishing characteristics of Continental CrossContactViking tires are an asymmetric tread pattern with longitudinal grooves, as well as an asymmetric arrangement of sipes, additional grip edges on the shoulder blocks of the tread.

Dignity: good handling on different surfaces, low noise, wear resistance

Review of Continental CrossContactViking tires by Alexey (Mazda CX5)

“Great tires. Installed these on all three cars in the family. Everyone is very happy! "

Goodyear Ultra Grip Ice +

Goodyear Ultra Grip Ice + design features include: ActiveGrip tread technology and a defined directional V-shaped tread pattern.

Dignity: reduced braking distance, improved handling on wet and snowy roads, improved traction of tires, increased resistance to lateral loads, high resistance to aquaplaning

Flaws: insufficient directional stability, problem braking on ice

Review of Goodyear Ultra Grip Ice + tires by Roman (Chery M11)

“Everything about these tires suits me personally. They work great on asphalt, but they also cope well with porridge. Once the tires saved me from an accident - if I had been on spikes, I would not have had time to brake 100% ”.

BUDGET CLASS

VredesteinQuatrac 3

Dignity: good value for money

Flaws: rather unstable on the track, the inner and outer tread wear unevenly

Vredestein Quatrac 3 tire review by MadLite (Ford Fusion)

“Naturally, it is better than the same“ Rosava ”, but I compare it with the Vredestein Quatrac 2, which for some reason has been discontinued. That was a tire! "

Kama Euro 519

Dignity: good cross-country ability in deep snow, directional stability, regardless of the condition of the road surface

Flaws: poor grip on snow and ice, low comfort level

Review of tires Kama Euro 519 user Danila (Honda Civic)

“I have been driving this rubber for the second winter and am not going to change it yet. I will only do this if competitors offer an adequate price. "

It is not worth comparing the results of studded and non-studded tires, since they were tested on different days, in different weather conditions, and the ratio of grip properties of both tires depends on the weather very much. At one temperature, "thorns" appear in front, at another - soft "Velcro". We figured it out a few years ago: ZR, 2009, No. 1

Now let's introduce the participants.

15 INCH NON-STAMPED

The most expensive tires are Nokian at 4150 rubles, but they are also the best - Hakkapeliitta R (Russian-made), together with Michelin X-Ice 2, shared the first place. The price / quality ratio is 4.5.

Slightly cheaper, for 4,100 rubles, you can buy ContiVikingContact 5. Our results suggest that these tires are in place. True, in terms of price / quality ratio (4.6), this purchase is slightly less profitable.

But Michelin X-Ice 2 is in the best position in the price competition: 3900 rubles. The price / quality ratio, equal to 4.2, is the most attractive in the top three. We believe that the price of this tire is deliberately understated, since there is already a new model on the market - the third generation Michelin X-Ice. It was officially presented last winter outside Russia, postponing the official presentation of the novelty with us for almost a year.

In fourth place is Goodyear UltraGrip Ice + 3560 rubles each. per piece (we assume the price is too high - payment for a high brand). The price / quality ratio is 4.1.

The fifth in the financial ranking is followed by Bridgestone Blizzak Revo GZ - 3520 rubles. The tire is just a little cheaper. With 892 points in our tests, it came in fourth place with an even more attractive price / performance ratio of 4.0.

Quite close in price (3500 rubles), but the next tire is already in sixth place - Pirelli Winter IceControl. In the final table he also takes the sixth place with 846 points. We believe that it should be sold a little cheaper: now the price / quality index is 4.1 - like that of the stronger Goodyear.

Yokohama iceGUARD iG35 for 3400 rubles. in seventh place, although in the test it showed the eighth result, gaining only 820 points. Once they buy, it means that there are those who are ready to pay for the Made in Japan inscription.

Nizhnekamsk Viatti Brina scored 816 points and took ninth place. A tire with a foreign name at a price of only 2600 rubles. apiece should sell well, say local marketers. Let's wish them good luck.

The cheapest tire is the Cordiant Polar SL for 2500 re. And in the test, it took seventh place, even ahead of the Japanese product. In our opinion, 826 points with a price / quality ratio equal to 3.0 is a result worthy of attention.

All tables are opened in full size by mouse click.

16 INCH SPIKES

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 7 for 6600 rub. ahead of the rest of the planet. Expensive, but deserved, as these are the best tires in our test: 929 points. The price / quality ratio is also "leading" - 7.1.

In second place is ContiIceContact. The difference with the winner is 200 rubles. ("Conti" costs 6400 rubles) and 4 points give a decrease in the price / quality index to 6.9.

The third place is taken by the new Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic, which is fair, since the tire is clearly one of the leaders. You can buy it for 5500 rubles.

Michelin X-Ice North 2 is sold a little cheaper - for 5400 rubles. The cost is even slightly underestimated, because in our tests XIN 2 scored 923 points, the price / quality ratio is the most attractive in the leading three of the test: 5.9.

Another 100 rubles. cheaper than Gislaved NordFrost 5 (5300 rubles). As a result of the test, the tire scored 905 points, taking the sixth place. The price / quality ratio of 5.9 is equivalent to Michelin. Our people love "Gislaved", therefore they do not spare money.

In sixth place Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 7000 for 5250 rubles. In our tests, this model was only able to take eighth place, gaining 855 points. The price / quality ratio is 6.1 - more than that of Michelin and Gislaved.

In seventh position is the Pirelli Winter Carving Edge, which can be bought for 5200 rubles. We recommend these tires as they came in fourth place in the tests with 918 points. And with such a cost, the price / quality ratio is the most attractive in the first six of the test: 5.7.

Followed by Yokohama iceGUARD iG35 - and, as usual, with a small gap in price with the "bridge": sold for 5100 rubles. The place in the price list is close to that occupied in our test, but the price / quality ratio is overpriced: 6.1.

Hankook's novelty i-Pike RS is sold in a completely different price category (4500 rubles). A worthy tire that takes a big step forward from the previous model and scored 886 points. Almost close to the milestone of 900 points, which distinguishes very good tires from others. The price / quality index is 5.1 - it's worth taking a closer look.

Nearby, no less worthy Russian-made Nordman 4 is offered for only 4400 rubles, that is, for two-thirds of the price of the leading older brother. Meanwhile, in our final list, "Nordman" occupies the fifth (!) Position. The price / quality ratio beckons - 4.8. Good suggestion.

For 4000 rubles. you will find Cordiant Polar 2. The place in the price rating corresponds to the situation we received, although the price / quality ratio (5.0) is less attractive than that of Nordman.

The parade of popular tires "Kama-Euro 519" closes up: only 3500 rubles, - the last place in our test. Buying a tire with a price / performance ratio equal to 4.3 will not be ruinous for the most modest budget.

FRICTION TIRE RATING 195 / 65R15

1-9_no_copyright

They were born in 2010, they are participating in our test for the first time.

Weak on the ice in all directions - acceleration, cornering and braking. On the snow they are more agreeable: they hold turns worse than others, accelerate poorly, but brake well - on a par with Nokian! Directional stability on a snowy road leaves much to be desired: the car noticeably prowls, demanding steering. Low information content interferes with maintaining the desired direction - the steering wheel is almost empty by effort. In fast corners, the first reaction is good, although the steering angles are too large. The transition to sliding is soft, the set trajectory is kept, however, here, too, the driver will be grieved by an unnecessarily light, empty steering wheel.

They do not like snowdrifts - if necessary, it is better to overcome them on the move, without turning and stopping. They refuse to change direction, moving away is possible only vnatyag. When slipping, they strive to bury themselves, reluctantly get out back. On an asphalt straight line, the car goes exactly when accelerating. It floats at a constant speed, requiring relentless adjustments, to which it reacts with an unpleasant steering of the rear axle.

Braking on a dry road is weak, on a wet one - the worst. Uncomfortable: they make a loud noise, with increasing speed they get stronger. They transmit shocks from medium and large road irregularities, vibrate on small ones. Fuel consumption is average at any speed.

2-9_no_copyright

3-8_no_copyright

It was created in 2008, appeared on our market in 2009, but the ZR takes part in the test for the first time.

On ice, lateral grip and acceleration are at their weakest. The braking is average, and it pleases. But on the snow, both braking and acceleration are worse than those of all other test participants, although in turns they hold on to the road average. On a snow-covered straight line, they prowl a little, take the car away from a given direction, pulling it into deeper snow. The handling is mediocre: the car does not obey the steering wheel well and strives to straighten the trajectory, sliding out of the bend. Skid occurs only if provoked, but it compensates well.

In deep snow it moves uncertainly, and only with a certain degree of slipping. Refuses to turn, slides into a rut or where there is less resistance. It goes smoothly on the asphalt, but strains when adjusting the direction. At low angles, the steering wheel is very sluggish, but as the steering angle increases, the car abruptly changes direction by a greater angle than required.

Braking is stable on dry and wet asphalt, braking distances are medium. Quite comfortable: quiet on any road, only slightly itchy on the comb. They transmit jerks and small shocks from small irregularities. They do not consume excess fuel, but they also do not allow saving.

4-8_no_copyright

5-7_no_copyright

Production and sales started in 2009.

On the ice, the behavior is unbalanced - average acceleration, weak cornering grip and the weakest braking. But on the snow, everything is smooth, the grip is average in all directions. On a snow-covered road, they seem to carry the car smoothly, and the steering wheel at "zero" is tight, understandable, but the tailgate walks from side to side, and this does not give confidence. The behavior is unstable when cornering. In the initial phase, an unpleasant drift often occurs, which can be compensated for by adding gas. When you turn the steering wheel, its information content sharply decreases, literally falls. How it will end, no one knows - you have to deal with either drift or skid.

The same uncertainty is in deep snow. They move well only on the verge of slipping. Slipping is especially dangerous at the moment of starting: it leads to burial. On the other hand, maneuvers are given without stress, the car is selected confidently in reverse. On the asphalt they run smoothly, the reactions when adjusting the direction are clear. But here, too, the rear axle does not allow the driver to relax, steering after the steering action. This imparts lagging oversteer to the vehicle.

Braking on dry and wet roads is weak. Tires cannot be called quiet - they emit an increased rumble. They transmit shocks to the body from medium and large irregularities, vibrate on small ones. Fuel consumption is above average at any speed.

8-7_no_copyright

6-6_no_copyright

It was created in 2009, then it began to be sold in Russia, in 2011 it was modernized.

On ice, braking and lateral traction are average and acceleration is weak. On the snow, on the contrary, the acceleration is average, the braking is weak, and the transverse grip properties are the lowest, on a par with the Viatti. On the snow-covered road they walk smoothly, not reacting to the different thickness of the snow blanket - the directional stability of the Pirelli is traditionally good. The handling is also without remarks: the steering wheel is tight, understandable, the reactions are clear. The transition to sliding is soft, the trajectory can be set and adjusted both with the steering wheel and with the gas. There is practically no skid, in the limit the whole car begins to slide outward.

They do not want to overcome deep snow. They move forward reluctantly, even trying to bury themselves in motion. Well, at least they get out in reverse. On the asphalt they resemble summer tires - a tight steering wheel in the near-zero zone, excellent information content and clear adherence to a given direction.

Braking is surprisingly weak on wet and weakest on dry asphalt. The noise is high, the vibration load is high - the company pays little attention to comfort. They roll not very willingly - the fuel consumption is increased at any speed.

9-6_no_copyright

7-5_no_copyright

They were born in 2009 and have been on the market since 2010.

They are deservedly included in the top five. They differ from those who were left behind in a good balance: all characteristics, if not leadership, but even on any of the surfaces that you meet in winter on our roads. For example, on ice both in the longitudinal and transverse directions showed average results. Not so good on snow: acceleration and lateral grip are average, but weak braking is a little let down. At high speed, they run smoothly in the snow, but there is not enough information on the steering wheel. Confidence is also lacking when cornering. Upon entering, a noticeable delay in reactions forces the steering wheel to be turned unnecessarily. For this reason, in the initial phase of the turn, the car goes into demolition, demanding to release the gas. And on the turning arc it strives to slip into a skid, which, fortunately, is easily parried.

They overcome snowdrifts without stress, go forward confidently, do not bury themselves when starting off, but they do not like to skid much. They scour the asphalt slightly on lateral irregularities, they respond to steering with a slight delay. As for the noise, there are no complaints, even on rough asphalt they roll quietly. But on convex irregularities they shake the car decently and transmit vibrations from seams, cracks and microroughnesses of the road.

The brakes are medium, showing no preference for dry or wet surfaces. At a speed of 60 km / h they help to save fuel, at 90 km / h they look average from this point of view.

10-5_no_copyright

11-4_no_copyright

The model is the same age as "Goodyear", created in 2009, has been sold in our market since 2010.

Good on ice in acceleration, braking and lateral grip are only average. On snow, acceleration and lateral traction are average, and braking is weak. Only Yokohama stops worse. They walk smoothly along the snowy road. The experts noted not only a confident retention of direction, but also an informative rudder, as well as immediate reactions to course corrections. In fast corners, speed is limited by gentle front axle drift, which is eliminated by turning the steering wheel or slowing down slightly. The information content of the steering wheel is high.

Drifts are reluctant to overcome, move forward uncertainly, turn badly. They move in reverse more confidently, allowing them to get out of the snow trap. On the asphalt they go almost evenly, they scour a little on transverse irregularities, and when adjusting the direction they are a little late.

They brake well on wet surfaces, but they stop best on dry ones. They are quite comfortable - they walk on any surface softly and quietly, except perhaps a little hiss on a snowy road. Fuel consumption is average at 60 km / h, and increased at 90 km / h.

13–4_no_copyright

12-3_no_copyright

Produced since 2008, at the same time they began to be sold on the Russian market.

During this time, the mixture has been modernized more than once. On ice, they show average results in braking and lateral traction, and accelerate well. But they cling to the snow best of all: they were in the lead in the corresponding exercises. But directional stability let us down a little: slight difficulties appear when trying to correct the direction of movement. With each small turn of the steering wheel, the driver is a little annoying with a slow reaction and a shallow but prolonged skid. In fast corners, delays in reactions and low information content of the steering wheel interfere, which leads to an increasing drift with prolonged stabilization.

In deep snow they turn a car into a tractor. They move very confidently, move and maneuver in any modes, without fear of slipping. They float slightly on the asphalt, are susceptible to the influence of a crosswind, noticeably lag behind the steering wheel for corrective actions. They transmit vibrations from small irregularities, road joints pass rigidly, making the car shudder. They make noise, crunch and buzz unpleasantly in slippery corners when they find something to catch on to.

They are the best brakes on wet asphalt. And on dry grounds they show good results. At a speed of 60 km / h, the most economical ones (along with Goodyear, Michelin and Nokian), at 90 km / h, do not require too much.

14-3_no_copyright

15–2_no_copyright

Created in 2008, since then they have been sold.

Good balance of grip on all surfaces found on winter roads. On ice, the grip properties are even, regardless of actions and modes - in a corner, during acceleration, during braking. On snow, lateral grip and acceleration are good, but braking is average. They walk in a straight line, without a hint of a desire to evade a given direction, they accurately respond to the steering wheel when adjusting the course. In the corners, they behave clearly, without problems or surprises. Bends are clearly prescribed, allow you to adjust the radius by steering or changing the fuel supply.

They feel at home in the snowdrifts. The sensations are similar to those that you get from Continental. They row confidently, get under way in any modes, maneuver without difficulty. On the asphalt they run smoothly, they win over with clear reactions comparable to the behavior of summer tires.

They brake well, regardless of whether the asphalt is dry or wet. Comfortable: the tractor track and rough ice are only slightly sounded. There are also no comments about the smoothness of the course. They are economical at city speeds, do not abuse fuel even at 90 km / h.

17–2_no_copyright

16–1_no_copyright

Created in 2008, since then they have been modernized almost every year.

On the ice - adhesion properties unattainable for competitors in the test in all disciplines: in braking, during acceleration and on a circle. On the snow, the grip is very good: during acceleration and when cornering, the best, on a par with the Continental, is slightly inferior in braking efficiency - the second result. On a straight "white" road, they walk smoothly, without requiring adjustment. In terms of handling, they are similar to the Bridgestone and Pirelli: equally clear reactions, the car obediently changes its trajectory when manipulating the steering wheel or gas. Equally good stabilization after rider-induced slips.

It is better to overcome deep snow by drowning the gas pedal to the floor. True, in this mode you run the risk of getting into such a snowdrift, from where you cannot get out without a shovel or outside help. Although during the tests it was not needed - the car always went in reverse. They walk smoothly on the asphalt, but experts noted slight delays in course correction.

They brake well on wet surfaces and medium on dry surfaces. As for comfort, there are some minor remarks - the noise level on an uneven road is slightly increased, vibrations from small irregularities are transmitted. At any speed, fuel consumption is the lowest in the test.

18–1_no_copyright

STUDED TIRE RATING 205 / 55R16

19-11_no_copyright

Created in 2008, since then it has been sold. In 2010, the composition of the rubber compound was modernized.

Nevertheless, against the background of other winter tires "Kama-Euro 519" looks weak. On the ice, the adhesion properties are very low, worse only in the "Kordiant". On snow, grip is also more than modest. The only consolation is that the balance of grip properties is quite even in all directions: it slows down, accelerates and holds the road in corners weakly. It is better to drive slowly on a snow-covered road: the car prowls from side to side. In a slippery corner, the behavior is ragged: the car breaks down first into demolition, then into a skid. More or less obeys the steering wheel only on the packed snow. On ice, even at low speed, it breaks into a skid. Glides on any surface for a long time. Very large steering angles and significant delays in reactions interfere with keeping the car under control.

Moves not quite confidently in deep snow. At the moment of starting, it is better not to slip. With the wheels turned to the side, it gets under way better than straight. Reverse is selected without problems. On the asphalt it prowls heavily along the road. Very large steering angles, significant lag and low information content, as well as unpleasant steering of the rear axle interfere with the direction correction.

Braking on wet pavement is weak, on dry - the weakest. On the ice and asphalt, the tread is howling loudly. Very hard - they transmit shocks from medium irregularities and vibrations from small ones.

22-11_no_copyright

20-10_no_copyright

We saw the light in 2009, but appeared in our test for the first time.

Excessively recessed spikes make the tire practically helpless on the ice - neither accelerate, nor turn, nor stop. It holds a little better in the snow. Lateral traction is closer to average, although acceleration is weak and braking is weak. The course on the snow is fairly flat, with only slight yawing with depth changes. On ice, the grip properties are subjectively assessed as very poor. Do not turn the steering wheel sharply, otherwise the car refuses to turn. If, nevertheless, it was possible to turn, a skid awaits on the arc. On snow, the speed is limited by a sharp break into a skid. Insufficient information content of the steering wheel and small delays in reactions prevent it from being countered.

In deep snow, they move not quite confidently. There are no pronounced preferences in driving modes, they pull the car well with a slight slip. They are confidently reversing. They walk smoothly on the asphalt, but when adjusting the direction, light steering of the rear axle and insufficient steering information interfere.

Braking is average on dry and wet roads. They do not indulge in comfort: they buzz annoyingly loudly, shake the body on convex irregularities, push on medium ones, transmit vibrations to small ones. Fuel consumption is higher at 60 km / h, above average at 90 km / h. The spikes are not held very reliably: during the tests, the protrusion value has changed by three tens.

23–10_no_copyright

21-9_no_copyright

Quite fresh tires, created in 2010, have been sold in Russia since that time.

But in our test they lit up for the first time. On ice, grip in all directions is average. On the snow, they behave less confidently: braking and lateral grip are weak, acceleration is the most sluggish, on a par with the "Bridgestone". They prowl a little on a snowy road. In cornering, insufficiently high grip properties are affected - the car completely slides outward.

Snowdrifts are not for these tires: they get stuck in deep snow, as they say, out of the blue. When starting off, they fall through, strive to bury themselves. They move uncertainly in reverse. They drive smoothly on ideal asphalt, but this is not often found on our roads. Therefore, constant directional corrections are required, which are complicated by delays in reactions and unpleasant steering of the rear axle.

On a dry road, the car stops reluctantly, and braking on a wet one is the weakest. Very hard: Impact from unevenness is transmitted to the floor and seat, vibrations occur on the steering wheel. They make a loud noise and hum with thorns. Average fuel consumption at any speed. The thorns hold securely, there are no losses, but the size of the protrusion is more than modest: such thorns cannot reliably catch on ice and dense snow.

24-9_no_copyright

25–8_no_copyright

They were created in 2009, but appeared on the Russian market with a delay, in 2010.

On ice, the grip properties are average in braking, cornering and acceleration. They ride on snow less confidently than on ice. Braking is weak, acceleration is the most sluggish, like that of Yokohama, lateral grip is also the lowest. They prowl a little on a snowy road, but they don't leave the trajectory. Slow reactions to driving. In fast corners, speed is limited by long drifts. When sliding by the front axle, the car does not respond to steering turns.

In deep snow, he confidently starts and moves, but only vnatyag. As soon as the wheels turn a little, traction is lost and the car immediately stops. They walk on the asphalt exactly, keep the given course. But when it is necessary to correct the direction of movement, the driver is strained by the steering of the rear axle and the insufficiently informative steering wheel.

When measuring the stopping distance, "Yokohama" smelled again. Like hers, braking is weak on both dry and wet surfaces. They are not comfortable enough: they transmit shocks from irregularities to the body, they make a loud noise with the tread and spikes, even at high speed. Fuel consumption is higher at 60 km / h, above average at 90 km / h. The protrusion of the spines and the rate of increase in the protrusion are normal. There are no losses during the test.

28–8_no_copyright

26-7_no_copyright

A novelty on the Russian market. As they say, in the heat of the heat.

On ice, the grip is high, the balance is reasonable. Braking and lateral grip are good, acceleration is average. The snow is also quite strong. Longitudinal adhesion properties are good, transverse ones are of medium level. On a snow-covered road, they prowl slightly, but they do not leave the trajectory. Insufficient information content of the steering wheel and a slight delay in adjusting the direction of travel were noted. Slip stalls in corners are a bit harsh, the car glides longer than we would like, but the traction recovery is soft and smooth.

In deep snow, they move not quite confidently; when slipping at the start, they show a tendency to self-digging. They are confidently reversing. On the asphalt, the car is forced to float in the lane. A wide "zero", delays in reactions, steering of the rear axle and insufficient information content interfere.

The brakes are weak, both on dry asphalt and on wet ones. Comfort Notes: Minor vibrations from minor bumps and increased overall noise from studded tires. At a speed of 60 km / h, fuel consumption is below average, at 90 km / h - the most economical. The amount of protrusion of the spines and the rate of increase in the protrusion are normal. During the test, there was no loss of thorns.

29–7_no_copyright

27–6_no_copyright

The oldest tires in our test.

They have been produced since 2006, since the same time they have been sold in Russia. On the ice, they can boast of a good balance: they brake and turn well, accelerate moderately. On snow, grip in any direction is average - also good. On a snow-covered straight line, they walk smoothly, without requiring steering. In turns on ice and rolled snow, they delight with clear reactions and a very soft transition to sliding. However, on loose snow, a sharp skid occurs on the arc, requiring clear parrying actions from the driver.

They do not like deep snow, they move confidently only on freshly fallen powder. If the snow is a little denser, packed, you can only drive vnatyag, without slipping. On an asphalt straight line, the car goes smoothly, reactions to a change in course are immediate, except that the information content on the steering wheel is almost lacking.

Braking is brilliant: both on wet and dry asphalt the tires stop perfectly. The background noise is heightened, as in most "studs", and there are no complaints about the smoothness of the ride - all road irregularities are well smoothed out. Most voracious at any speed. The amount of stud protrusion and the rate of its growth during the tests are optimal. Lost a couple of spikes from the front wheels.

30–6_no_copyright

31-5_no_copyright

Produced since 2009, sold since the same time.

The tread pattern is the heritage of the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 4 tire. They differ from it in the compound composition and in the studs with a round core. They are participating in our tests for the first time. On ice, braking and lateral grip are average, acceleration is good. On snow, the behavior is more confident: longitudinal grip properties are good, and lateral grip is the most reliable. Both the front axle and the rear axle prowl along a snow-covered straight line, responding to the density of the snow. At small angles of rotation of the steering wheel, its insufficient information content was noted. You can drive quickly in corners - the reactions are clear, the behavior is understandable. Speed ​​is limited by slight skidding, which is easily compensated for by steering or adding throttle.

They are not afraid of snowdrifts: it is enough to add gas, and the car will go wherever the steering wheel is turned. Reverse is selected without problems. They walk smoothly on the asphalt, but when adjusting the course, a delay in reactions and an empty steering wheel are noticeable.

The brakes are average on dry asphalt, and good on wet ones. They make a loud noise with the tread and spikes, especially from 40 to 60 km / h. Smoothness can be called good, do not be small vibrations from small irregularities. Average fuel consumption at any speed. The amount of stud protrusion and its growth during the tests are close to the optimum. There are no lost thorns.

34–5_no_copyright

32–4_no_copyright

They were born in 2007. Sold in Russia since 2008.

From time to time they renew the design, the spikes and the composition of the mixture, leaving the "face" unchanged. Recent innovations have allowed Carving to join the leading group. On ice, longitudinal grip is average and lateral grip is highest. On snow, grip is good in all directions. On a snowy road, they hold a course perfectly. The car moves like an arrow and reacts sensitively even to small turns of a dense, highly informative steering wheel. Turns are prescribed with a twinkle. Clear, understandable control, sensitive reactions to the slightest turn of the steering wheel. In the limit, the speed is limited by a soft and smooth skid, which can be extinguished with a small addition of gas or by turning the steering wheel. The glide is fast but stabilizes gently.

Drifts are easily overcome, they do not bury themselves at the start, they drive and slip, and with skidding, they easily maneuver. They walk smoothly on the asphalt, a clear "zero" helps to correct the direction.

Braking on wet surfaces is medium, on dry surfaces well. Traditionally, they do not indulge in comfort: they make noise, as if the plane is flying by, shake it on any irregularities, as if pumped over. Most likely, the low level of comfort is a kind of payment for the pleasure of driving on a winter road. Fuel consumption is average at any speed. The size of the protrusion of the spikes and the rate of their growth during the tests are optimal. There are no losses.

35-4_no_copyright

33–3_no_copyright

They have been offered on the Russian market since 2009.

Today's leaders are the only ones using round core spikes. On ice, longitudinal grip is average, lateral grip is good. On snow, the layout is slightly different: the longitudinal grip is good, and the lateral grip is of the middle hand. On a snow-covered road, the car is carried evenly and stably. Reactions during course correction - no comments. When cornering, the behavior is clear and understandable. Speed ​​is most often limited by soft drift, but the car responds well to steering and tries to maintain the set trajectory.

Even in sliding, it does not get out of control of the driver. You can not only pierce through the snowdrifts, but also easily maneuver in them, stop and get under way again. If he stopped the car, he backed up a little and drove on. It is always possible to get out in reverse. On the pavement, directional stability is good, "zero" is clear, the steering wheel is tight - the tires are almost like summer tires.

They brake well on dry asphalt, and average on wet ones. The noise level is increased, on hard surfaces the rumble of spikes is clearly audible, especially in the range of 60–90 km / h. Smooth running without remarks - they well dampen any irregularities. Fuel is saved in all speed modes - at both 60 and 90 km / h. The protrusion of the spines and the rate of change in the size of the protrusion are normal. During the running-in and testing, not a single spike was lost.

36-3_no_copyright

37–2_no_copyright

A relatively fresh model that appeared in 2010.

Since the same year, it has been sold in Russia. It differs from other tires in the "diamond" shape of the spikes. On ice, traction is good in all directions. On snow, it's the same - both longitudinal and lateral grip are high. On a snowy road, they allow you to go quickly, they carry the car smoothly. But the information content on the steering wheel is not enough. When cornering, front axle drift prevails. A drift, if any, appears softly and smoothly and is eliminated without much difficulty.

In deep snow they go well only with intensive slipping, but this mode is not very informative. If you bury yourself, reverse gear will not help. They walk smoothly on the asphalt, the steering wheel is tight, the "zero" is clear, the reactions when adjusting the direction are immediate.

The brakes on wet asphalt are better than others, on dry they show average results, on a par with "Gislaved". They make a loud noise with spikes on hard surfaces - both on ice and on asphalt, especially loudly from 70 to 90 km / h. Quite hard: they transmit vibrations from road irregularities to the floor of the body, seat and steering wheel. Average fuel consumption at any speed. The protrusion of the studs is within the optimum value. The studs are very secure in the rubber.

40–2_no_copyright

38–1_no_copyright

Introduced at the end of 2008, sold since 2009.

Constantly undergoing renewal, which allows them to stay in the lead. On ice they showed the best longitudinal grip, lateral - average. On snow - the best acceleration, good braking and grip when cornering. On a snow-covered road, they walk smoothly, without remarks. The steering wheel is tight, the reactions are clear. When cornering, speed is limited by gentle, assisting skidding, which is most easily eliminated with a little throttle. Even in sliding, the car obeys the driver's commands, restoring the trajectory gently and smoothly.

They move confidently in deep snow, maneuver well, and get under way without the desire to bury themselves. Any mode: from professional vnatyag movement, without turning the wheels, to "blonde" "gas to the floor". Reverse very well. On the asphalt, the movement is smooth, but when corrected, the rear axle steers unpleasantly.

Braking on dry asphalt is weak, on wet - average. Comfort is not ideal: clear noise of spikes on asphalt and smooth ice, shocks from road irregularities, primarily convex ones. Economical at all speeds. The amount of protrusion of the spines is close to the reasonable limit. Nevertheless, the average protrusion during testing has changed by only 0.1 mm, which means that the spikes in the rubber are held securely.

41–1_no_copyright

39-0_no_copyright

New, preparing for sale this year.

We could not calculate the final scores, because in braking on the snow Ice Arctic beat the best serial tire, which we took as a "base" in the calculations. On ice, longitudinal grip is good, and lateral grip is average. On snow - super braking, very good acceleration and average lateral grip. On a snowy road, they prowl slightly, reacting with a delay to the direction correction. In fast corners, the behavior is ambiguous. In the initial phase, at the stage of entering the bend, there is a noticeable delay in the reactions, leading to the drift of the front axle. After the adhesion is restored, already on the arc, there is a high likelihood of a skid, which has to be compensated for both by the steering wheel and by adding gas at the same time. After sliding, the restoration of adhesion occurs quite abruptly, provoking a skid that shoots off in the other direction.

There is no concept of "deep snow" for these tires. Helping the car to get out of the snow captivity was never needed. On the asphalt they float noticeably from side to side, requiring constant adjustments. Very wide "zero", steering delays.

The brakes on wet asphalt are good, on dry - medium. They push on medium irregularities, buzz hard with a tread and spikes. The amount of protrusion of the spikes is at the limit. However, the change in the protrusion during the tests in only one "ten" indicates that the spikes are firmly fixed.

42-0_no_copyright

Details on the designation and classification of tires can be found

Vadim KORABLEV, Yuri KUROCHKIN, Evgeny LARIN,

Anton MISHIN, Andrey OBRAZUMOV,

Valery PAVLOV and Dmitry TESTOV.

Thank you for the technical support of the employees of the AvtoVAZ auto test site,

Togliatti company "Volgashintorg",

as well as tire manufacturers,

who submitted their products for testing.

Winter is on its way, and we have already tested budget winter tires of the popular dimension 205/55 R16. The well-known models and novelties of the season took part in the test. Ten sets of tires have been tested on winter roads and asphalt. The domestic "Belshina" presented a couple of pleasant surprises. But let's talk about everything in order.

At the winter training ground in Finland, we tested ten sets of tires: Nokian Nordman RS2, Gislaved Soft Frost 200, Cordiant Winter Drive, Hankook Winter I * Cept iZ2, Dunlop Winter Maxx WM01, Kumho I`Zen KW31, Sava Eskimo Ice, Belshina Artmotion Snow Bel-317, Viatti Brina V521, Nitto Therma Spike.

The most expensive tires in our test turned out to be Dunlop tires - 195 rubles, but the cheapest Russian Cordiant tires - 93 rubles. But all tires in one way or another belong to the budget line in their lineup.

The winter part of the tests was carried out at the polar range on ice and snow at a temperature of -10 ... -8 ° C. The spring part of the tests took place at a temperature of + 5 ... 7 ° С.

Ice test

Ice is not the most pleasant surface for friction tires, but if they are of the Scandinavian type, they should perform well even in such conditions.

In braking on ice, the gap between the first and last places was 4 meters. When braking from a speed of 25 km / h, this is quite a lot.

In the “Acceleration on Ice” exercise, the situation practically did not change, only Hankook and Sava switched places. However, for some, the results of this test may not be decisive when choosing a tire.

But the ability of the tire to stay in the corner, that is, the level of lateral grip, is an important indicator. We evaluate it, moving with the maximum possible speed along the ice circle.

Here Viatti tires unexpectedly came to the second place, the four outsiders did not change. But for a more comprehensive assessment of the behavior of both the tires and the car on the ice, we run a series of races along the winding ice track. In addition to lap times, we also subjectively assess vehicle handling.

The main surprise was not the first place for Cordiant (although Russian tires surprised me), but the seventh place for Belshina. Moreover, the loss to the leaders is not so great, but for ourselves we noted that the car on domestic tires does not drive too fast, but predictably, which means it is safe. Nitto, on the other hand, frankly failed in this test, losing even the penultimate place by about 4 seconds.

Snow test

While ice tests quickly reveal flaws in the tire design, snow is no longer such a demanding surface. In braking, the scatter of results was only 7%.

We cannot fail to note the excellent fourth result of Belshina. She lost a meter of stopping distance to the leader. Nitto also managed to fail in the snow, showing the longest braking distances.

In overclocking on snow, the spread of results has already increased to 15%. At the same time, the first six met the difference within 5%. “Belshina”, alas, ended up in the top three, although in fact the loss of the outsiders does not exceed one and a half seconds.

Despite the excellent braking performance, the Hankook tires were in the last place in handling on the winding snow trail, losing to the leader - the Sava tires - by about three seconds. Belshina was in seventh place, showing good grip. But the propensity to drift prevented the drive faster.

Asphalt test

In large cities, where roads are relatively clean in winter, tires spend most of the time on the asphalt. Here you can add periods of off-season, when the temperatures are already low, but there is no snow yet. In these conditions, winter tires must also provide safety. On dry and wet asphalt, we conduct braking tests and also evaluate handling on wet asphalt.

It often happens that tires that did not perform well in winter tests show themselves on the asphalt. This is exactly what happened with Belshina.

In braking on wet asphalt, the Sava tires performed best. Belshina has an unexpected second result. Dunlop and Kumho had the longest stopping distances - they "left" 4 meters further than the leaders.

On dry asphalt, Nokian climbed to first place, Belshina dropped to sixth position, losing a little over a meter to the leader, which cannot be considered a failure.

The last surprise was presented by "Belshina" in the test for handling on wet asphalt.

The fastest way to pass the wet handling track was on Sava tires. Belshina's fourth place is an excellent result. In addition to a good absolute track time, we noted the reliable and understandable behavior of the car on domestic tires.

Rolling resistance

The rolling resistance of tires is assessed on a special test bench. The parameter indicates how easily the tire rolls on the road. The lower this indicator, the more economical driving on such tires will be.

Results and evaluations

The results of all tests with grades can be found in the final table. If we analyze the intermediate scores, it turns out that in the asphalt part of the program Belshina Artmotion Snow took the fifth place, leaving only eminent brands ahead. But the final ninth place went to the Belarusian tire workers for the lack of grip on the ice.

First place winners Nokian Nordman RS2 proved to be excellent in all "ice" disciplines, confidently held on to the snow and braked best of all on dry asphalt. But they cost from 142 rubles. Recommended for those who live outside the city and most often ride on snow and ice.

Slovakia lost quite a bit to Russian-made Finnish tires Gislaved Soft * Frost 200. But they pulled out due to good performance on asphalt, although in winter tests they also did not lag behind the leader. Good all-round tires, but the price is slightly above average - 150 rubles.

Korean Hankook Winter I * Cept iZ2 best braked on the snow and never failed in other disciplines, for which they got a well-deserved third place. At a price of 140 rubles, you can choose them as a universal "shoe" if there is no trust in the Russian product.

Polish Sava Eskimo Ice handled well on snow and wet asphalt, but failed in acceleration on snow. The rest of the indicators were average, so the fourth place. Moreover, the price is not the lowest - 129 rubles.

Russian tires with an indistinct name Viatti Brina V521 according to the results of the test they took the fifth place. They didn’t fire in any of the tests, but they didn’t fail either. Therefore, at a price of 96 rubles, they can be considered a good purchase for those who do not like to spend extra money.

Ranked sixth Cordiant Winter Drive lived up to their name, outstripping all competitors in handling on ice. But at the same time they showed the worst result in braking on dry asphalt. However, at the lowest price - 93 rubles - quite acceptable tires for moderate winters.

Chinese Kumho I`Zen KW31 and Japanese Dunlop Winter Maxx WM01 scored almost the same number of points, finishing seventh and eighth, respectively. In all indicators, they were slightly below average, but without obvious failures. At the same time, Chinese tires cost 167 rubles, and Japanese tires - 195 (the most expensive in our test), so Chinese tires would be a more rational choice.

The ninth place went to domestic tires. The reason for the low place is poor results on ice, but confident behavior on asphalt, both dry and wet. At a price of 107 rubles Belshina ArtMotion Snow can be safely recommended to those who spend most of their time on clean city roads, occasionally falling into the snow. Our tires also boast a large tread depth of 10 mm.

Japanese tires Nitto Therma Spike they did not show themselves anything special, while showing the worst results in three disciplines - handling on ice, braking on snow and handling on a wet track. At a price of 138 rubles, it makes sense to look towards other manufacturers.

Where are we going this winter? For those who plan to buy winter tires, we offer the test results of winter tires - studded and non-studded. Journal experts "Behind the wheel" by tradition, we carried out test drives of tires that are sold in Russian stores before the winter season 2011-2012.

Let's start with the studded rubber. Pirelli (Winter Carving Edge model) unexpectedly took the first place, overtaking the leaders of the previous season - Nokian, Michelin and Continental (he owns the Gislaved brand).

Best Stud Tires 2011

Place	Manufacturer and model
1.	Pirelli Winter Carving Edge
2.	Michelin X-Ice North 2
3.	Nokian Hakkapeliitta 7
4.	Continental ContiIce Contact
5.	Nord frost 5
6.	GoodYear UltraGrip Extrime
7.	Cordiant Sno-Max
8.	Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 7000
9.	Kama Euro 519
10.	Contyre Arctic Ice II
11.	Amtel NordMaster ST310

Note: Tires with a standard size 205 / 55R16 were tested

As for studless tires, they are also called "Scandinavian" or "Velcro", then there were no surprises. Like last year, Nokian, Continental and Michelin were among the leaders in the ranking.

The best non-studded tires of 2011

Place	Manufacturer and model
1.	Nokian Hakkapeliitta R
2.	Continental ContiVikingContact 5
3.	Michelin x-ice 2
4.	Bridgestone Blizzak Revo GZ
5.	Cordiant Polar SL
6.	Amtel NordMaster CL

Note: the test was carried out on tires with a standard size 175 / 65R14

The car market offers a huge assortment of tires, it is very difficult to choose the best ones. Therefore, to simplify the choice of motorists, independent experts draw up ratings of winter tires, they indicate the advantages and disadvantages of tires of various brands.

In the winter season, drivers have a question: "to stud or not to stud tires?" Studded products are designed for a harsh winter, provide normal vehicle stability when driving on ice or deep snow. Non-studded tires are not only suitable for driving on icy or snow-covered roads, they can be used on dry or wet road surfaces. There is an alternative option - these are the so-called "Velcro", they have a large lamellation of the tread blocks, this design, in the absence of studs, ensures the stability of the car on snow or ice. Which of these tires is better depends on the preferences of the driver and the operating conditions of the vehicle.

When choosing tires for the winter on your own, use the ratings of winter tires, when they are compiled by independent experts, the following characteristics of tires of various brands are taken into account:

• braking distance of the car on a dry, snow-covered, slushy, ice-covered road;
• maximum vehicle acceleration;
• fuel consumption;
• noise of rubber;
• driving comfort.

Comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of rubber of different brands allows us to determine the leaders in the production of quality tires.

Leaders and outsiders of budget classes of studded tires

First place

Sava Eskimo Stud Bus

The tires are designed for extreme winter conditions, occupying a leading position among models of budget tire classes. It contains a silicon-containing polymer that provides elastic properties of products at a sufficiently low ambient temperature.

Advantages:

• low noise;
• stability of the car on ice, snow, dry and wet asphalt;
• average course stability.

Disadvantages: average indicators of handling, course stability when testing on a wet road surface.

Second place

Tire Matador MP30 Sibir Ice 2

The tires are designed in compliance with international standards and taking into account the peculiarities of the Russian climate. The composition of rubber provides elasticity, resistance of products to low-temperature operating conditions.

Advantages:

• wear resistance;
• low weight thanks to the use of aluminum spikes;
• good acceleration on winter roads;
• small braking distance on wet and dry road surfaces;
• average grip on ice and snow.

Disadvantages:

• average course stability and handling on ice-covered roads;
• noisy.

Third place

Tire Cordiant Snow Cross

These tires are designed for the harsh Russian winters. The wear resistance of products is ensured by the presence of silicon in the rubber composition. These tires proved to be excellent when driving on rolled snow, even surpassed the middle class tires in some parameters.

Advantages:

• average braking on the road covered with ice;
• good acceleration on rolled snow and icy road surfaces;
• average exchange rate stability among the test participants.

Flaws:

• not the shortest braking on dry and wet asphalt surfaces;
• the studs protrude strongly, creating additional noise while driving;
• an increase in fuel consumption when moving the car at high speeds;
• there is a chance of getting stuck when driving on loose snow.

Fourth place

Rubber Kama Euro 519

Structurally, tires consist of two layers of rubber. One makes the studs resistant to falling out, the other makes the tires elastic at very low temperatures.

Advantages:

• fast braking on snow and dry asphalt;
• average cross-country ability on winter roads;

Disadvantages:

• increased braking on icy roads and wet asphalt;
• tires react slowly to steering commands;
• low stability on snowy, icy roads.

Fifth place

Tire Viatti Brina Nordico V-522

The products have an asymmetric tread pattern that provides traction on the road surface. The outer part of the tread provides stability during cornering.

Advantages:

• good course stability of the car on a road covered with snow;
• elasticity.

Flaws:

• for all types of testing, tires have shown low results;
• increased braking on any kind of road surface;
• a small patch of rubber-to-surface contact when driving on ice.

Leaders and outsiders of the middle class of studded tires

First place

Tires Hankook W419 iPike RS

These tires have a unique rubber compound that provides increased rubber elasticity at fairly low temperatures. Silicon, which is part of the rubber, increases the wear resistance of the products.

Advantages:

• good braking performance on winter roads;
• excellent adhesion of tires to the road surface when driving on packed snow or a road covered with a shallow snow layer;
• ensure the vehicle's course stability when driving on asphalt;
• help to reduce fuel consumption;
• high wear resistance.

Flaws:

• poor cross-country ability while driving on slush or road surface covered with snow porridge;
• unpredictability of tires when performing maneuvers on dry asphalt;
• not the quietest rubber.

Second place

Tires Gislaved Nord Frost 200

The rubber was developed by a Swedish company using new technologies. The improvement in the performance of these tires when testing on a snowy road is provided by a large number of small tread blocks. The tread lamellae have a different design, providing greater grip of the rubber with the road surface.

Advantages:

• provide confident movement of the car on a snow-covered or snow-covered road;
• good braking performance on asphalt;
• tires practically do not make noise;

Disadvantages:

• tires react to steering commands with a slight delay;
• poor handling on icy ruts.

Third place

Tire tires Nordman 5

The tires are designed with a special tread that provides good grip of the tires with the road surface. The design feature of the tread is the location in its central part of the longitudinal rib, which has edges in the form of zigzags - this improves the course stability of the car.

Advantages:

• light spikes that reduce the weight of the product;
• good braking performance on snow-covered or ice-covered road surfaces;
• help to reduce fuel consumption.

Flaws:

• in comparison with competitors, controllability is not the highest;
• poor braking performance on dry asphalt surfaces;
• the weak side of the tread is often damaged;
• noisy.

Fourth place

Tire Yokohama IceGuard Stud IG55

Developed with a special tread design that provides good grip of the tire with the road surface. The studs are located on the surface of the product in such a way as to reduce the amount of noise while driving.

Advantages:

• a good indicator of course stability and controllability;
• spikes rarely fly out due to their deep planting in rubber;
• practically silent.

Disadvantages:

• the indicator of braking on an icy or snowy road is not the highest among competitors;
• poor permeability on a surface with icy tracks;
• average course stability while driving on an asphalt road surface.

Fifth place

Tire Kumho WinterCraft ice WI31

The tire tread is covered with a large number of sipes to ensure a good adhesion of the tires to the road surface. The aramid fibers in the tires give them rigidity and serve as micropips.

Advantages:

• excellent performance when driving on dry and wet asphalt surfaces;
• deep-set spikes provide a reduction in rubber noise;
• good performance on packed snow.

Flaws:

• weak braking on ice;
• slipping on snow gruel;
• low handling on a snowy road.

Conclusion

The ratings of winter tires determine the top-best manufacturers, allow you to choose the most suitable tire option for a specific car and its operating conditions. It should be borne in mind that the winner does not always match the characteristics of the operating conditions of the vehicle, and outsiders, in most cases, behave well when driving around the city.

Also consider the tire manufacturer's recommended tire sizes and the matching tires and rims. As a rule, it is possible to install discs with a larger diameter and rubber with a lower profile, for example, discs with a radius of R14 can be replaced with R15 or R16, choosing the appropriate rubber.